It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
What was Nixon's role, in your opinion, during the Gemini missions and before? You seem to imply he had his hand all over the Apollo hoax, so where was he in the previous missions? Thanks!
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: wmd_2008
I clicked on the Aulis link and there's plenty of other examples of lateral movement of the Apollo photos.
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: wmd_2008
I clicked on the Aulis link and there's plenty of other examples of lateral movement of the Apollo photos.
the writers conclusion is that it was done in a studio of upto 300m.. and a projection screen 100-120m away..
some of the images were also taken while taking video footage..
taking video footage will mean they had to have filmed in a vacuum (if we ignore gravity completely for the time being) which means..
the largest vacuum chamber in the world is 30m in diameter.. the largest vacuum chamber is 4x smaller than what the writer predicts..
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: choos
Wrong, mtns that are supposedly miles away are merely 150m away.
Your conclusions about the vacuum chamber are ridiculous.
So, if your calculations about the moon gravity are correct, why does it look so funny when you plug in what the earth's numbers should be? Shouldn't it look like earth instead of astros on meth?
The rest is you guys, once again, attacking a man's credentials instead of his work.
I don't believe a vacuum chamber was needed.
Just slow motion which is somehow so Magic its fooling more people than it should, sadly. You don't move in slow motion on the moon,
in fact, your arms and legs would have never moved faster until you adjust to the gravititational differences.
Yes, you would fall at a different rate after leaping, that's it. I honestly can't believe this many self proclaimed experts are duped by the simplest of camera tricks.
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: wmd_2008
You can see that the mountains are a backdrop and the line of foreground separation is present in every photo, on flat ground!
s.hswstatic.com...
That picture is almost hilarious now. You guys still believe math proves we went but I could make a scientifically correct film with a 50 ape, and that proves nothing other than a production can be scientifically correct. If you can't understand that, then this is really telling.
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: choos
Wrong, mtns that are supposedly miles away are merely 150m away. Your conclusions about the vacuum chamber are ridiculous.
So, if your calculations about the moon gravity are correct, why does it look so funny when you plug in what the earth's numbers should be?
Shouldn't it look like earth instead of astros on meth? The rest is you guys, once again, attacking a man's credentials instead of his work.
I don't believe a vacuum chamber was needed.
Just slow motion which is somehow so Magic its fooling more people than it should, sadly.
You don't move in slow motion on the moon, in fact, your arms and legs would have never moved faster until you adjust to the gravititational differences.
Yes, you would fall at a different rate after leaping, that's it.
I honestly can't believe this many self proclaimed experts are duped by the simplest of camera tricks.
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: wmd_2008
You can see that the mountains are a backdrop and the line of foreground separation is present in every photo, on flat ground!
s.hswstatic.com...
That picture is almost hilarious now. You guys still believe math proves we went but I could make a scientifically correct film with a 50 ape, and that proves nothing other than a production can be scientifically correct. If you can't understand that, then this is really telling.
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: AgentSmith
Mr. smith, that picture is hilarious. We both know it but we have different opinions about Apollo. It always comes down to someone is an expert and someone else isn't, with the Apollo side. My sister is a scientist. She also teaches Pharmacy at a prestigious university in the south. She isn't magical and she's prone to the same fallacy/misunderstanding as the guy who is in belief about the queen/Dutch moon rock.
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: choos
Dude, you obfuscate every argument I make and I don't know if you intentionally do it or not. I can't even respond to that. I get where this is going and I think it's time to let someone else have the stage for a bit. Maybe they'll have better luck against this posse.
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: AgentSmith
Mr. smith, that picture is hilarious. We both know it but we have different opinions about Apollo. It always comes down to someone is an expert and someone else isn't, with the Apollo side. My sister is a scientist. She also teaches Pharmacy at a prestigious university in the south. She isn't magical and she's prone to the same fallacy/misunderstanding as the guy who is in belief about the queen/Dutch moon rock. I believe many just side with NASA because it makes them feel part of an elite group of minds and they don't want to be on the other side. It's sad, that nobody has even been a fraction of the way to the moon and we are here arguing about a mythical piece of dust and how fast it falls. I mean really!?? You can't be intellectually honest and not question Apollo. You haven't nor myself verified anything. All we've done is analyze data, photos, film. All of which are controlled mediums. I can feel this argument turning towards a hostile tone, not you, I just feel it and if I'm responsible, I'm sorry. I'll try better not to be
originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: choos
why does it look so funny when you plug in what the earth's numbers should be? Shouldn't it look like earth instead of astros on meth?