It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Justoneman
You as a person that is ignoring data claiming there is a trend of ignoring past data is ironically priceless.
You are not debating science at this point you are simply arguing your opinion which is not backed up by the science.
You already admitted that you cherry pick from science that suits you while ignoring other science.
I know that trying to debate someone who does that is about as fruitful as playing chess with pigeons. You are a step above some of your compatriots in my book though because by you being honest about being intellectually dishonest has saved me the time and effort of coming to that conclusion on my own so I thank you for not wasting my time.
I see no point in your position that shows me you actually studied the information I am providing or even considering it
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Grimpachi
Seems we've moved on to meme salad. I don't know how you even dissected that last post... lmao.
originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: mbkennel
I think volcanic activity might better explain this graph of energy affect listed as 10 to the 22nd Joules, than CO2 forcing would.
Throw in the geological data for cyclical warming and cooling and I have some reason to have serious doubt.
At this point we all should ultimately question if we can trust that the NASA agenda is not skewed by politics.
We still need to burn fossil fuels for our society to survive and to continue to evolve
originally posted by: VoidHawk
Its not warming!!!!!
But but but.....WHAT ABOUT THE CARBON TAXES!!!
originally posted by: chuck258
originally posted by: thesearchfortruth
a reply to: Cinrad
You seem a little off on this....
The article says...
The near two-decade long "pause" in rising average global surface temperatures was a "distraction" that did not change long term model predictions of a much hotter world this century
I think the fact that their model did not predict this pause speaks volumes about their 'research'. .
originally posted by: Cinrad
a reply to: Grimpachi
Are you saying that I dont comprehend my own post? And if you are then are you saying I am an idiot?