House Benghazi panel calls Clinton to testify

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
a reply to: xuenchen

Must have sliped your mind that there was already investigations lead by the gop and they found nothing, but yea lets waste more tax payers money to hope one of the clowns the gop will run with might win lol.

That was only part of the investigations.

Look it up.

She needs to be investigated to the hilt until everything is known. It is already a foregone conclusion what an incredible liar Hillary is. It is already well known that people died because of her negligence. It is already well known that people linked to the Clinton's, who have even the possibility of knowledge that can hurt them, that they will likely be found dead from some accident or suicide.

And allowing a Liar like Hillary to become president will be just as disastrous as it has been having a liar like Obama be president.

Like the president, Hillary is a huge mass of BETRAYALS just hoping and waiting to happen against America. And morally bankrupt voters are the only ones supporting them. I will laugh some day when she is DEAD.

a reply to: Sremmos80

Obviously not enough. But, because of that, Benghazi should be cast in the same dismal unthorough investigation?? We should take our prior lessons and do our thorough diligence in THIS investigation.

originally posted by: MystikMushroom
There have been inquiries, hearings, documents produced, and in-depth investigations into Benghazi than the entire 2nd Iraq war.

Four Americans died in Benghazi, over 5,000 servicemen died in Iraq.

When you put things into perspective this whole thing seems ridiculous.

The difference is the coverup.

a reply to: Ultralight

What has been not complete about the other investigations?

If they were not complete and thorough then what makes this one promising?

I thought it was just a protest to a YouTube video. That's what the president said.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Ultralight

Glad they are wasting time and money on another one of these investigatons.

This is what the third one now?

Oh, it is real alright. Whether or not she will be held to account for her past behavior is debatable but, the one fact that cannot be denied is that she has admitted to destroying subpoenaed evidence.

a reply to: Sremmos80

Seriously? several stories in the NYT gives reason to question Clintons relationship with the truth. She has lied in many instances and, expect that Benghazi info she provided needs revisiting.

a reply to: Ultralight

So nothing about want was wrong with the previous investigations?

This will all go away when Hillary drops her campaign and disappears. Until then...

originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: ~Lucidity

Do you NOT understand that the person in charge of SECURITY at that embassy (and all others) conveniently had a server she owned and operated in her home; one in which she accessed her work thru that same server AND emailed her subordinates, colleagues, even Obama with her personal email on her personal server. Then, after receiving requests for any emails or docs relating to Benghazi, she sent 50,000 pages (not emails but pages) supposedly to the Benghazi committee and then WIPED her server of documents WE own and paid for?

This rings true even if Clinton had been a Republican. . Clinton lied. Susan Rice lied. Obama lied. People died.

If you don't see this as a HUGE issue, you need a pulse and a clue.

Don't tell me what I don't understand. Just how many investigations do we need into this one incident in a world full of these types of incidents?



And don't take the words I said and introduce your psychobabble on top of it as if you're replying to something I said.

This is hunt is political game playing and so out of proportion as to be laughable and wasting far too much of our money while ignoring real crimes in their house.

Odd how the report will be released right before the election to, eh? They know their dumbass base well.

a reply to: ~Lucidity

The key person involved in THIS investigation is running for PRESIDENT. She knowingly and intentionally wiped her server, which contained info critical to her former position as SECRETARY OF STATE. She lied over and over again.
I will tell you again because you clearly are employed by her in some way because most intelligent people agree it is imperative we fully investigate Clinton. She has to refile her nonprofits taxes for last 5 years because...why? She lied.

a reply to: ~Lucidity

In all of those attacks on US embassies, the majority of those deaths are of civilians, local police, and the attackers themselves. None of those attacks even made it onto embassy grounds.


Benghazi is a whole other ballgame in which the sheer negligence of H. Clinton and B. Obama cost them their lives.

a reply to: ~Lucidity

Very intelligent to use Lindsey Graham, he's the poster boy for being a puppet RINO. Course it does nothing to sway the focus away from the lunatic Hillary Clinton though. She is an absolute power hungry and corrupt mad women. ~$heopleNation

Oh did leave out that Sam Seder is a hypocritical excuse making leftist spin artist? What a dirty filthy little maggot. He acts as if his Democrat heroes are not playing the exact same game. Read between their lies.

These are the little worms that are equally guilty of misleading the herds of morons. The hypocrisy on both sides of this political circus side show is so pathetic. ~$heopleNation

The wackos sure did show up fast to defend her majesty