It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: artistpoet
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I am speaking truth ... but if you wish to call me a liar so be it ...
My brother had "seizures" after receiving the MMR shot
He was later diagnosed with Severe Autism
I was about 11 at the time ... It was a very frightening experience ... watching my baby brother convulsing ...
The doctor was called and diagnosed seizures ...
After the seizures ... My brother went from a normal healthy baby and regressed dramatically ... He was later given the diagnoses of having Severe Autism ...
I repeat ... "I am speaking truth" ... if you wish to call me a liar so be it ...
Even though the outward symptoms of autism may not be apparent immediately after birth, the underlying brain differences are accumulating. Sometimes the brain can compensate to make up for the disrupted processes. Eventually though, if the disruption was sufficiently severe, the compensatory processes are no longer enough, and symptoms emerge.
This may likewise explain many cases of autistic regression, in which a young child seems to be developing normally, only to lose abilities, or regress, into autism. Perhaps the initial disruption in brain development continued worsening. Or perhaps the compensatory processes couldn’t keep up.
and i guess this could be said to be the birth of the anti vax movement as the anti-vaccination league was formed shortly there after suprised i had never heard this case get brought up in the debates before
Ruling on Henning Jacobson Justice John Marshall Harlan delivered the decision for a 7-2 majority. He rejected Henning Jacobson’s claim that the Fourteenth Amendment gave him the right to refuse vaccination. Harlan deemed that the Massachusetts state punishment of fine or imprisonment on those who refused vaccines was acceptable but that those individuals could not be forcibly vaccinated. [2] At the end of his decision, Judge Harlan acknowledged that for certain individuals, the requirement of vaccination would be cruel and inhuman and therefore an overreach of government power. This created a medical exemption for adults under the Massachusetts health law but Harlan denied that Henning Jacobson deserved exemption. [3] Legal Precedent Harlan ruled that personal liberties could be suspended given external circumstances. During an outbreak, for example, the state can encroach on those liberties when "the safety of the general public may demand."[1] He compared the smallpox outbreak to the Civil War (in which three out of nine Justices at the term served) by saying that a community has the right to protect itself both from disease and from military invasion. [3] More broadly, Harlan ruled that the State of Massachusetts was justified in mandating vaccination, as “there are manifold restraints to which each person is necessarily subject for the common good” [3] While Harlan supported such restraints, he also warned that if the state targeted specific individuals or populations to unnecessary restrictions the court may have to step in to protect them. This specification falls just a few years after Wong Wai v. Williamson in which a federal circuit court injunction in San Francisco was overturned. This injunction required all Chinese residents of San Francisco to get a dangerous bubonic plague inoculation if they wished to leave the city, which Judge William Morrow ruled was "boldly directed against the Asiatic or Mongolian race as a class."[3] Harlan's decision supported both police power and limits on said power, and his decision would be invoked to support both in later cases. He stated his nuanced opinion on the limits of government power by saying that “general terms should be so limited in their application as not to lead to injustice, oppression or absurd consequence.” [3]
You admit you were 11. How well do you think you remember that event happening? How do you know that the kid wasn't going to be diagnosed anyways, even without the vaccine?
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I think parents with autistic kids need and want a something that they can point a finger at. They NEED to know why their child has autism. They'll selectively read studies the way they want, to support the beliefs they already have.
It's not unlike having faith in a religion. An atheist usually can't convince a highly religious person that their faith is bogus.
One trillion studies done around the globe could all say that the MMR doesn't cause autism, yet the anti-vax people would still claim it does. Vaccinations make a convenient scapegoat that parents (a lot of stay at home mothers I've noticed from my own personal experience) can point to.
A conspiracy feels good to buy into. When we buy into a conspiracy, we feel as if we are beholden of knowledge that the masses aren't privy to. We feel "smarter" than other people, a bit more superior. We swagger around with a smarmy grin, self-assured in the fact that we know the actual "truth". Anything that doesn't fit into the conspiracy becomes part of the conspiracy -- for you see, the conspiracy isn't wrong, the uneducated masses are.
originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Don't accuse me of playing coy. I lay my cards right on the table. What you won't ever get from me is games.
Every drug comes with an insert outlining use, indications, contraindications and warnings. Every single one. All you have to do is ask the person giving the vaccine or what ever drug is being administered and they have to give it to you. You can also find copies of inserts online usually at the manufacturer's own site.
Here is a list of common drugs and the information of their inserts.
www.vaccinesafety.edu...
These are PDF files you need to download.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
Pdf on MMR2 mentions a great deal about the uncertainty of the effects the vaccine has on fetal development. Do not get pregnant for a few months after the vaccine. Very clear on that warning.
Almost everyone I know has had measles and mumps. More people die from the common cold, I'm sure, probably due to a fever but you also run a hight risk of fever from the vaccines ( as per your link)... I think that if people could make up their own minds without pressure from propaganda, it is a no brainer that a vaccine for measles and mumps is not worth any risk.
Do you know of any research that suggests a link between some vaccines and autism. We talked about the odds being small but there was still a very small chance. Apparrently that small chanxe does not not exist in the mainstream. There is study after study published to prove there is NO link between the 2. Not just a small chance.
Do you know of any accepted research?
No. There has not been a causal link to autism per se but there are links of serious alergic reactions to immunization and effects on brain development.
These can be so serious that they can cause severe to mild mental retardation. And yes, the term retardation is appropriate here as it literally means to halt mental development
originally posted by: FurvusRexCaeli
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
Pdf on MMR2 mentions a great deal about the uncertainty of the effects the vaccine has on fetal development. Do not get pregnant for a few months after the vaccine. Very clear on that warning.
Important safety tip. When you take your one-year-old to get vaccinated, make sure they don't plan on getting pregnant immediately afterward.
Almost everyone I know has had measles and mumps. More people die from the common cold, I'm sure, probably due to a fever but you also run a hight risk of fever from the vaccines ( as per your link)... I think that if people could make up their own minds without pressure from propaganda, it is a no brainer that a vaccine for measles and mumps is not worth any risk.
A no-brainer, sure. But people with brains have come to the opposite conclusion. Again and again, all over the world, for decades.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: MALBOSIA
I am not sure T&C allows posting replies from other threads, however did you miss the part where he said the child was cured with water over 6 years?
Homeopathic = water or alcohol
That part right there should call into question the reliability of the posters statement.
originally posted by: artistpoet
a reply to: Krazysh0t
You admit you were 11. How well do you think you remember that event happening? How do you know that the kid wasn't going to be diagnosed anyways, even without the vaccine?
I remember the event vividly ... It was traumatic for not only myself but my whole family ... I have since spoken with my Mother many times who concurred ... "The kid" my youngest brother was a normal healthy baby ... He was around 18 months old when he received the MMR shot ...
He regressed immediately after the "seizures"... and it was quite obvious to all ... he was not the same anymore ... he had become vegatative and unresponsive ... He was taken to several doctors and eventually diagnosed as "Severely Autistic" ... I am not sure of the time scale between the MMR Jab and subsequent diagnosis of Severe Autism ...
The bolded part confirms what I linked before. Autism can take up to 2 years in child before showing. It can be highly deceptive and look like the child is perfectly normal. Like I said, you are trying to link causation with correlation and it just isn't there
Autism can take up to 2 years in child before showing.
Unless a doctor SPECIALLY diagnosed that the vaccine caused the autism then you are falsely correlating a bad event to an unrelated event. The MMR vaccine DOESN'T cause autism, there is no confirmed link. Your anecdotal evidence is just that. Anecdotal.