It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
age is pretty irrelevant in this thread, asking for age in this matter is the same as saying you are stupid.
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
math is something we invented and has nothing to do with nature.
On the other hand geometry is nature and it doesn't need math.
All geometry derives from polarization or radiation.
originally posted by: darkorange
Ok,
last couple of pages did not reveal anything tangible.
From another forum I perplexed into definition of photon and light.
What is photon and what is light? Are these same phenomenon? Can we say that 'photon is a state of light upon release or capture meaning we 'captured' a 'sample' of light flux?
last question to complete noob, how photon propagates when free? Does it continue as particle or starts to inflate as a wave?
if it is a particle all the way whilst traveling, what keeps it confined discreet whilst en route? It has no mass!
DO.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
If GR isn't true:
- GPS would be out by miles every day. Because time dilation has to be taken into account when programming the software.
- we would ever have been able to send the Rosetta, cassini and Voyager (and countless ) probes to their locations
These are just 2 of the countless, proven , testable reasons why GR is correct and works.
originally posted by: WeAre0ne
There exists alternate theories that can explain the physical phenomena known as "time dilation" in a much more simple and accurate manner than GR. Said theories would still allow us to also program our GPS, and calculate flight paths for spacecrafts.
Oh my really?
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Uuuf...No burden of proof is on you. Nonetheless go thru the thread in my signature if you wish
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Once again. No it isnt. YOU are the once making the claim that something is wrong. it is not up to me to convince you. Its up to you to convince us that your incredible claim (and it is an incredible claim) is in fact corrcet.
Keep going, i can do this all night and im not the one making myself look foolish.
originally posted by: WeAre0ne
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
If GR isn't true:
- GPS would be out by miles every day. Because time dilation has to be taken into account when programming the software.
- we would ever have been able to send the Rosetta, cassini and Voyager (and countless ) probes to their locations
These are just 2 of the countless, proven , testable reasons why GR is correct and works.
There exists alternate theories that can explain the physical phenomena known as "time dilation" in a much more simple and accurate manner than GR. Said theories would still allow us to also program our GPS, and calculate flight paths for spacecrafts.
Just because a theory allows us to do a few things, doesn't mean it is true, nor does it mean it is the only theory that will ever provide the same or better results.
I could name a few theories that helped predict a few things, but ended up being wrong in the end.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Oh my really?
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Uuuf...No burden of proof is on you. Nonetheless go thru the thread in my signature if you wish
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Once again. No it isnt. YOU are the once making the claim that something is wrong. it is not up to me to convince you. Its up to you to convince us that your incredible claim (and it is an incredible claim) is in fact corrcet.
Keep going, i can do this all night and im not the one making myself look foolish.
Talk to gps makers and satellite launchers and find out if the give a monkey's f# for Einstein's GR. Lol
Heck you are not doing your home work I gave you, so be my guest and wallow in your ignorance.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Oh my really?
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Uuuf...No burden of proof is on you. Nonetheless go thru the thread in my signature if you wish
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Once again. No it isnt. YOU are the once making the claim that something is wrong. it is not up to me to convince you. Its up to you to convince us that your incredible claim (and it is an incredible claim) is in fact corrcet.
Keep going, i can do this all night and im not the one making myself look foolish.
Talk to gps makers and satellite launchers and find out if the give a monkey's f# for Einstein's GR. Lol
I dont need to talk to them. I know that they do. Now tell me, how do you know they dont?
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Heck you are not doing your home work I gave you, so be my guest and wallow in your ignorance.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Oh my really?
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Uuuf...No burden of proof is on you. Nonetheless go thru the thread in my signature if you wish
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Once again. No it isnt. YOU are the once making the claim that something is wrong. it is not up to me to convince you. Its up to you to convince us that your incredible claim (and it is an incredible claim) is in fact corrcet.
Keep going, i can do this all night and im not the one making myself look foolish.
Talk to gps makers and satellite launchers and find out if the give a monkey's f# for Einstein's GR. Lol
I dont need to talk to them. I know that they do. Now tell me, how do you know they dont?
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
No there are not. none that are taken seriously at least.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
What do you not understand?Go ahd and elaborate which equations from GR are used for GPS and space flight.