It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

HEAD of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Says the Whole Thing Was a SHAM

page: 1
18

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 04:53 PM
link   
I follow the new post pretty closely and since this was posted yesterday, I haven't seen anything that resembled this posted yet.

This is quite a bit of a read, and it is from Reuters, but still thought it deserved a look over from the members here. I highly doubt it will surprise many here if true, but that is what we are here for, to figure out just how much of it may be true.

A couple key points of the article to give you a idea:


The FBI head agent in charge of the anthrax investigation – Richard Lambert – has just filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit calling the entire FBI investigation bull



On July 6, 2006, Plaintiff provided a whistleblower report of mismanagement to the FBI’s Deputy Director pursuant to Title 5, United States Code, Section 2303. Reports of mismanagement conveyed in writing and orally included: (a) WFO’s persistent understaffing of the AMERITHRAX investigation; (b) the threat of WFO’s Agent in charge to retaliate if Plaintiff disclosed the understaffing to FBI Headquarters; (c) WFO’s insistence on staffing the AMERITHRAX investigation principally with new Agents recently graduated from the FBI Academy resulting in an average investigative tenure of 18 months with 12 of 20 Agents assigned to the case having no prior investigative experience at all; (d) WFO’s eviction of the AMERITHRAX Task Force from the WFO building in downtown Washington and its relegation to Tysons Corner, Virginia to free up space for Attorney General Ashcroft’s new pornography squads; (e) FBI Director’s Mueller’s mandate to Plaintiff to “compartmentalize” the AMERITHRAX investigation by stove piping the flow of case information and walling off task force members from those aspects of the case not specifically assigned to them – a move intended to stem the tide of anonymous media leaks by government officials regarding details of the investigation.


A few of his complaints:

◾Handwriting analysis failed to link the anthrax letters to known writing samples from Ivins


◾No textile fibers were found in Ivins’ office, residence or vehicles matching fibers found on the scotch tape used to seal the envelopes


◾Samples of his hair failed to match hair follicles found inside the Princeton, N.J., mailbox used to mail the letters


As I don't wish to break any of the terms of this site, there are more, but you will have to see for yourself. LINK TO ARTICLE

Like I also mentioned this is quite a read with many different points and links to be considered. Way to much to actually go into here. I do hope that the members that do read it let it be known how much they are pretty sure is correct, and how much may be reaching. Do you think this guy has a case, or will he end up like many before him that have tried to blow the proverbial whistle? Does anyone really even care anymore?

AGAIN, LINK TO ARTICLE




posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 04:58 PM
link   
a reply to: onehuman

Well I guessed right on the first day...the whole thing was weird from day one.


Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like).
Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

www.washingtonsblog.com...



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 05:57 PM
link   
This week we learned of the White House covering up the House of Saud's involvement in the 911 attack. Saudi family members were allowed to exit the country while all aircraft were grounded. Now the revelations of the anthrax investigation. What's next?

The assumption of the involvement of American scientists may also be false as well. If the FBI was misleading the country then they must know the true source of the anthrax attack and are still concealing the information. The next question is why? Was this a false flag operation that went wrong?



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 06:09 PM
link   
THE FBI IS A SHAM





NOTE: only one of these is really my hero , and that would be Albert of course


edit on 18-4-2015 by Kapusta because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Kapusta

I see one on the FBI list that I would have killed if I caught her in Vietnam. She still needs to be in jail!



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 07:29 PM
link   
a reply to: onehuman

Start at 22:40.. It's right when Anthrax comes up. Ends at about 29:00 It's just 6.5 minutes to have your world change.

Some concise information about the Anthrax attacks. I've looked into this for a long while and I missed some of the plot even.. But this short bit of talk shows a good overview of what you should know if you havn't even looked into it.

This is bad.

-Anthrax comes from within the USA.
-Blamed on Iraq.
-Sent to people in congress against the patriot act.
-handwritten notes saying death to usa and isreal.
-Then Bruce Ivans blamed. Handwriting does not match.. He "commited suicide" with Tylenol.. And he's a toxicologist. Tylenol kills your liver. That's a PAINFUL way to go.
-certain government and press on CIPRO before the attack..

a few points...





I implore you.


When people say the government is Evil.. They think it's all one thing.. It's way worse than that.. Non elected elements are in positions of too much power, and there is in fighting.. We let the secrets get too big. We let liars by trade (CIA) and such agencies.. We let them stay secret and have training to corrupt and lie.. Of course they are meant to act in OTHER countries, as if that is a good thing....

OOPS...
edit on 18-4-2015 by KnightLight because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 09:01 PM
link   



edit on 18-4-2015 by Blowback because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 09:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Blowback

Seems these two videos certainly seem to be saying the same thing the head investigator is trying to blow the whistle on.
I always did wonder why that whole thing with the original impact it had, just seem to blow into history without much of a whimper after the fact. Not to mention it was quite awhile before they say they caught the guy. By then it was like oh yeah almost forgot about that. Pretty similar to things like the gulf oil spill. Everyone was all up in arms, but now you hardly hear a thing about it.

I could almost go for a false flag fail on this one. The timing of it so close to 911 and what it helped bring about as far as the war or invasion I guess I should say. Then almost like a oppsie happened and it conviently faded off the radar...or it accomplished what it needed to do perhaps.

Thanks for posting those. Now I need to watch the other one that a member posted now that I'm charged up again.

It would be interesting if it was something like this that they seem pretty confident most have forgotten about is the thing that actually blows the lid of a lot of things we have tried to uncover for so long, 911 being one of them.



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 10:07 PM
link   
a reply to: onehuman

Correct me if I am wrong but didn't the FBI concentrate their investigation on a Us scientist?



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 10:11 PM
link   
I always thought the anthrax attacks was ordered by the white house against the politicians and media sources that were against the Patriot Act.

These videos and lack of real investigations by our government proves this theory imo.



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 10:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra
Yes they did. The first one ended up settling a nice 5 million lawsuit eventually, the second one decided to overdose on Tylenol without ever being able to prove his innocence. The post up above by Blowback with the 2 videos, you might want to watch the first one if you can. It's points that all out. I think it was only like 9 minutes long.



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: KnightLight
This is straight one of the best videos I have seen in ages, you might wanna post its own thread. I haven't watched the first 20 minutes and I haven't finished it yet but wow, anthrax, Hilary, Saudi, and so much more. Did you know Rand Paul tried to have Abby Martin arrested and to have her press pass taken away for asking him why he endorsed Mitt Romney??

Just wow


edit on 18-4-2015 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-4-2015 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2015 @ 05:25 AM
link   
a reply to: onehuman

Okay I'll just come out and say it

US government is a REGIME not a government

People mafia is in control



posted on Apr, 19 2015 @ 06:11 AM
link   
a reply to: onehuman

As usual, this blogger is bending the truth to make this far more sensational than it actually is. If you look for other sources you will find more information about what this is actually about, and the whole thing hinges on his personal belief that the suspects guilt would not have been proven beyond reasonable doubt in court, despite the fact that even he acknowledges that the investigation was extremely compartmentalized and that he would therefore not have been privy to all of the evidence against this suspect.

He also claims that this would not have been proven in court by suggesting there were other leads that were not followed. But, as he himself admits, he was not privy to all of the information, so for all he knows there was plenty of evidence of those leads being incorrect.

This blog has been used as a source before, and every time I have seen it used it's a piece full of exaggerations, outright bs, out-of-context information and quotes, or just completely made-up nonsense.

This is not a viable source for credible information.



posted on Apr, 19 2015 @ 10:29 PM
link   
a reply to: LDragonFire

That video is the result of information spreading power getting out of hands...
Yes it does deserve a thread all on it's own.

I'm trying to not get too heavy all at once.

That Rand Paul Story is quite telling.

I'm trying to be subtle.

Sort of...

Odd shades of gray...


edit on 19-4-2015 by KnightLight because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 09:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: onehuman

Correct me if I am wrong but didn't the FBI concentrate their investigation on a Us scientist?



I thought the guy's name was Hatfill. What happened to him?

Was it Hatfield, Hadfieled, Hatfill??? Something like that.



posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 11:08 AM
link   
a reply to: WarminIndy

That guy had his name ruined to the world.

Anthrax subject receives payout




The U.S. settles with Dr. Steven J. Hatfill, whom it targeted after deadly mailings but never arrested.

Dr. Steven J. Hatfill, 54, who was called a "person of interest" in the case by then-Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft in 2002, said that label and repeated leaks of investigative details to the media damaged his reputation.

For months in the anxious atmosphere after Sept. 11, Hatfill was subjected to 24-hour surveillance and was widely identified as the leading suspect in the nation's first bioterrorism attack. However, he was never arrested or charged and a federal judge presiding over his lawsuit said recently that there "is not a scintilla of evidence" linking him to the mailings.

...$5.82 million from the government to settle his claim that the Justice Department and the FBI invaded his privacy and ruined his career...


I mean you guys get what is going on here right??? Then they had the second guy also with no evidence... And now they are just not going to find a guy.. They don't care.. This was from the inside.. Now only was it sold as another piece of evidence and scare tactics to get us into Iraq... But the people it was mailed to served as a threat, to vote yes on the patriot act. Some of the Anthrax letters were fake.

We are dealing with gangsters. The real killers still walk among us.

As I said the video I posted has a lot of info in it.
edit on 20-4-2015 by KnightLight because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 11:19 AM
link   
a reply to: WarminIndy

Here is a Link from 2010. Dr. Hatfill interviewed..

Linky


Listen to what happens.. The media was in on it before they could have been.. Meaning the FBI was working with them to make YOU guys at home think they have a lead... Investigate a guy as long as possible.. Then find a new guy and investigate him.. Get his name out in the news and then kill him... Now you guys lose the plot and think it's case closed..

The real suspects our still out there.



Bruce Ivins

On Tuesday, July 29, 2008, he died of an overdose of Tylenol with codeine in an apparent suicide after learning that criminal charges were likely to be filed against him by the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an alleged criminal connection to the 2001 anthrax attacks.[3][4][5] No formal charges were ever actually filed against him for the crime, and no direct evidence of his involvement has been uncovered.[6]

At a news conference at the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) on August 6, 2008, FBI and DOJ officials formally announced that the Government had concluded that Ivins was likely to have been solely responsible for "the deaths of five persons, and the injury of dozens of others

Linky

really... Really???


edit on 20-4-2015 by KnightLight because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 12:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: KnightLight
a reply to: WarminIndy

Here is a Link from 2010. Dr. Hatfill interviewed..

Linky


Listen to what happens.. The media was in on it before they could have been.. Meaning the FBI was working with them to make YOU guys at home think they have a lead... Investigate a guy as long as possible.. Then find a new guy and investigate him.. Get his name out in the news and then kill him... Now you guys lose the plot and think it's case closed..

The real suspects our still out there.



Bruce Ivins

On Tuesday, July 29, 2008, he died of an overdose of Tylenol with codeine in an apparent suicide after learning that criminal charges were likely to be filed against him by the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an alleged criminal connection to the 2001 anthrax attacks.[3][4][5] No formal charges were ever actually filed against him for the crime, and no direct evidence of his involvement has been uncovered.[6]

At a news conference at the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) on August 6, 2008, FBI and DOJ officials formally announced that the Government had concluded that Ivins was likely to have been solely responsible for "the deaths of five persons, and the injury of dozens of others

Linky

really... Really???



Why would anyone kill themselves with Tylenol? I mean you would throw it up if you took too much.

And why create Anthrax in a lab when it could be gotten from sheep? Maybe I am ignorant but it seemed strange to me that a disease well known to sheepherders would be created in a lab and then sent by mail. Why make it in the lab if it could be gotten naturally?

I just never understood that one and maybe I am ignorant.



posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: WarminIndy




Why make it in the lab if it could be gotten naturally?

I think you could not just go and gather it in a sheep herd, you need a lab to take a sample from the source and grow enough to be useable and concentrated otherwise it would not do enough damage.



new topics

top topics



 
18

log in

join