It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dntwastetime
Several posters who have been members for more than 4 years are agreeing with me that there is something serious to look at here .
The first 5 or 6 replys to this thread came from people who took absolutely zero time to do some research into the posting in the thread linked and just wanted to make fart jokes and troll remarks. I am not that good at building mega cool threads like some of the top guys here. I have limited time to spend designing the right threads.I do have time to light the tunnel , sound the canary, to point the way for more creative investigators to research if they choose.
There is something to this in the fact that the man named Richard Scobee is a very unusual skull structure and the "old" version of him is a man who has a very similar skull structure and very very unusual at that.
People do not want to believe they can be tricked and this tragedy was deliberately put in front of all the children for effect. Have a look at the new school busses that have satanic pentagrams for brake lights. They want to terrorize and mark the children with evil. it is a very diabolical and dark control system.
I would ask that this be moved back to ATS and maybe some help in transferring images and a real research into this. Something is going on here beyond stupid troll remarks.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: dntwastetime
Thing about the shuttle is its manned. There were no unmanned launches of that particular craft. Everyone saw it go up and explode…
They didn't survive.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
Why is this not in the the Gray Area? Or skunk works?
Were any of the photos proven to be fake? Are the names to the faces false.
Is there anything about this presentation that proven to be false other the submissions of "No" "Just no" and "nonsense"?
Seems weird that ATS would not at least wait for someone to debunk this before officially calling it a lie.
originally posted by: Signals
a reply to: opethPA
Yes, fun, isn't it?
I don't understand why this thread was moved to "ludicrous online lies" - Is that the new name for the Hoax forum?
Either way, it deserves some attention and legitimate thought, as far as the motive, I haven't a clue.
originally posted by: Urantia1111
Looks like good evidence to me. A couple of those comparisons are spot on. And of course this ends up in LOL. Disgusting policy here.