It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: enlightenedservant
Ah, thank you. You are maybe the second person I've seen to have reached the same conclusion I've had for a long time now who has articulated it (I'm sure others have gotten there too). The problem is simply human nature. No matter who we say we are or what we say we follow, each of us has the same flawed nature, and each of us is susceptible to the same range of temptations.
What makes the measure of a person is how we rise to that challenge. Do we master ourselves or are we mastered?
I suspect that you think that same as I on what happens when you let yourself be mastered by your nature.
God gives us the strength to see our way through and master ourselves. Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree with this. Maybe not.
originally posted by: gottaknow
a reply to: pthena
No problem at all. I consider myself an anti-theist as well and appreciate the sentiments.
I understand how as atheists, we've only recently had a voice whatsoever in human history whereas even a hundred years ago(or less) we'd be considered heathenistic and all sorts of shaming/worse that goes along with that.
Even now, our voice is small, but because we now have one, we're shamed into being some sort of bully for speaking up or considered a "religion" of our own, which is preposterous in many ways. It's pretty awful, really.
At least it appears the tide is finally turning and people are starting to think for themselves. It's very refreshing.
Also, I realize you do not consider yourself an atheist at this time. My post didn't come off as showing that.
originally posted by: IAmPhoenix7
So lets go back to the title of this thread. What really is the absolute trap of belief vs disbelief in God?
That being said, I was just wondering why you are atheist and anti-theist. Maybe your brain didn't develop it?
Are humans hard-wired
The frontal lobe, the area right behind our foreheads, helps us focus our attention in prayer and meditation.
The parietal lobe, located near the backs of our skulls, is the seat of our sensory information. Newberg says it's involved in that feeling of becoming part of something greater than oneself.
The limbic system, nestled deep in the center, regulates our emotions and is responsible for feelings of awe and joy.
originally posted by: WarminIndy
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Lightworth
Yeah well, in my experience it is exactly the opposite.
Not just with religion within itself. It seems to me the more obsessed (on the surface) a person appears to be with religion and/or conservative vs liberal belief structures, the more morally unethical they actually are in reality.
MSM religion really must attract morally unethical people like a magnet to metal. Since it teaches that you can basically spend your life being a cold hearted arse-hole and treat others however you please, just so long as you pray at the end of the day, all will be forgiven........Apparently.
Do you think that is possible? On another thread they were remembering the fall of Pnom Phen, I seem to recall Pol Phot was exactly nice either. So maybe both of those men could find grace within atheism to forgive their trespasses against humanity?
originally posted by: DeadSeraph
a reply to: Lightworth
Without firsthand personal experience (which is a valid reason to have one's opinion swayed either way), Agnosticism is the most rational position on the issue, bar none.
When you can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God, the obvious conclusion is to leave the subject open to exploration.
I have experienced the connectivity with my various belief pursuits and then came to the realization that those feelings weren't real.
There is nothing that I can do beyond harm to others that is wrong. There is nothing anyone can do beyond harm to others that is wrong.
There is nothing that I can do beyond harm to others that is wrong. There is nothing anyone can do beyond harm to others that is wrong.
I am not going to a Hell. No one is.
I am not going to an afterlife. No one is.
I do not have a soul. No one does.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
The cowards way out is what you are saying (undecided). You have already given up bothering to do the spiritual/intellectual work required; as you think "Firsthand Personal Experience" is GIVIN; God is supposed to appear before you and proclaim itself? Why would it do that; or care if you are so proclaimed to be 'undecided' OF NO FAITH (did you create yourself) and if so how did you manage it without help? You want God to prove ITS existence to you. YOU ARE actually THE PROOF God exists as it created you.
Either way, no the burden of proof remains on the person who believes something exists rather than not believing which is where atheism stands.
The redundancy theory holds that there is no property of truth at all, and appearances of the expression ‘true’ in our sentences are redundant, having no effect on what we express.
Debate and Democracy Debate is not a forum for asserting absolute truths, but rather a means of making and evaluating arguments that allows debaters to better understand their own and others’ positions.
When the assertion to prove is a negative claim, the burden takes the form of a negative proof, proof of impossibility, or mere evidence of absence. If this negative assertion is in response to a claim made by another party in a debate, asserting the falsehood of the positive claim shifts the burden of proof from the party making the first claim to the one asserting its falsehood, as the position "I do not believe that X is true" is different from the explicit denial "I believe that X is false".[
originally posted by: gottaknow
While I do get what you mean and I fully understand how that conclusion could have been made from my posting, again, I must say that you took those "statements" out of context. Those are the concepts I live by. They were written to exemplify why I feel freedom from my lack of belief. Not to make claims upon the world. Those are the conclusions I (and many other atheists) have come to that express why I feel the way I do in an answer to pthena's question of "Why am I an atheist?"
Context is so hard to deliver in writing sometimes.
Still, I was tempted to blast this post with a dozen or more articles refuting the existence of all those things for fun.
Vhb: The cowards way out is what you are saying (undecided). You have already given up bothering to do the spiritual/intellectual work required; as you think "Firsthand Personal Experience" is GIVIN; God is supposed to appear before you and proclaim itself? Why would it do that; or care if you are so proclaimed to be 'undecided' OF NO FAITH (did you create yourself) and if so how did you manage it without help? You want God to prove ITS existence to you. YOU ARE actually THE PROOF God exists as it created you.
bb23108: A few people have said something similar to this about being undecided. But it may take time to discover what the actual truth is, and during this time one IS undecided. When you are being open to whatever the reality of this appearance is, one must not have any pre-conceived notions - so one is temporarily agnostic.
bb28108: So to jump to the conclusion that an agnostic is a coward is unfair - especially if they are in the process of determining what is truth.
bb28108: If they just are being lazy, and just like the label "agnostic" because they still don't know, then that is another matter - one in which the individual is minimally being lazy and settling for the status quo. I don't know if I would say they are being a coward in that case - but being lazy and foolish, perhaps.
bb28108: There is such a force to just buy the local pattern ("matrix") that is happening because it seems real. So it makes us lazy about this great matter - and yet, it is really the most important matter. This is what must be fully considered until one can come to a real informed decision, and then on, live according to what you discovered is Reality.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
Local pattern Matrixing is designed to keep us far to busy to contemplate deeper truths (earn a living/daily distractions). What seems to be real is not real at all (this worldly existence) as is a carnival ride to accelerate the souls progression. The major point of incarnation is to figure this out while IN BODY (in just a few short days or decades) otherwise one has failed the REAL challenge [figure this out before you loose your vessel]. Thank you bb; for your response.
I said that there must be something that connects us to the spiritual, and I never defined hell. Therefore, the burden of proof is not on me, because I did not make an absolute truth statement.