It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russia lifts ban on delivering missile-defence system to Iran

page: 4
11
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: intrepid




The difference is that Iran actually has a viable military.



But can they handle the Israeli Army, and can the Israeli Army deal with Iran while also have to defend against Hezbollah

Israeli Officials: Iran Massively Ramping Up Arming of Hezbollah in Preparation for Major Assault on Israel


www.algemeiner.com... l/

I guess if it goes down we will see how tough Israel can be.




posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:16 PM
link   
I have said my part and I'm going to leave at that before it goes any further.



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
I guess if it goes down we will see how tough Israel can be.


Without Big Brother leading the way? If it wasn't that people would lose their lives(both sides) I would pay to see that.



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ancient Champion
I have said my part and I'm going to leave at that before it goes any further.


Aww bailing on us now?
Could not not back up your false claim that I love Putin?

Could you not back up your false claim I think the USA evil?

Are your little illusions about your Hollywood taught history being shattered?

awwwww diddums......

Drowning in your own BS is never a pleasant thing.
edit on 14-4-2015 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)

edit on 14-4-2015 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

Israeli has no problem holding it own, it's no push over.
edit on 14-4-2015 by Ancient Champion because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ancient Champion
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

Israeli has no problem holding it own, it's no push over.


OK. Let them go it without US intervention then. Btw, this isn't 1967.



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok

I might say something that might get me banned, much to your delight.
edit on 14-4-2015 by Ancient Champion because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Ancient Champion
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

Israeli has no problem holding it own, it's no push over.


OK. Let them go it without US intervention then. Btw, this isn't 1967.


It's not up to me if you haven't noticed.



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ancient Champion

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Ancient Champion
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

Israeli has no problem holding it own, it's no push over.


OK. Let them go it without US intervention then. Btw, this isn't 1967.


It's not up to me if you haven't noticed.


So basically without US intervention Israel isn't quite the tough guy then. That has been obvious forever.



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Ancient Champion

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Ancient Champion
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

Israeli has no problem holding it own, it's no push over.


OK. Let them go it without US intervention then. Btw, this isn't 1967.


It's not up to me if you haven't noticed.


So basically without US intervention Israel isn't quite the tough guy then. That has been obvious forever.


Did I say that? I pointed out that I'm not the president.



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: 200Plus




Russia plants a "missile defense systems" in Iran and it's all good because obviously it's only a defensive weapon.

The US plants a "missile defense system" in Europe and it's an act of aggression against Russia.


Well that's because according to some the US is the cause of all bad things done throughout history, and some will blame us for something in the future.


That may be some people's logic. But there are other people who think America should mind its own business. I want my tax money to go towards improving American schools & infrastructure, not to covert attempts to destabilize Iran. I want my tax money to improve the quality of life for all Americans, starting with our poorest citizens. How is this never ending cycle of war & war provocations going to do that?



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: mSparks43

When was an SR71 intercepted EVER ?
I want to know that one...



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: mSparks43

And exactly how big do you think the RCS of a stealth is?



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 05:04 PM
link   
So ,like D .Storm we fly NOE kill the LOW ADA, stealth systems ,orbital locates all the radar signatures to target.
Cruise missile them to get them to scatter( They WILL be manned by Persians so they won't be as good as Russian crews, tactic wise)Then send in surgigal bomb runs EMP and electronic killing systems and penetarators for bunkers.
If WE haven't got what we need we'll FAB it up like we always do.

WE could do what ever our leaders order us to do.
WHY we should is up to them.
edit on 14-4-2015 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 05:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ancient Champion

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Ancient Champion
Oh no we better hid now, don't worry people America can handle Iran.


Uh huh. The proof being how well they did against the powerhouses of Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. The difference is that Iran actually has a viable military.


The proof is the fact that we beat Germany twice and Japan. If Iran wants a fight they know where they can find us.


You beat Germany the first time and Japan. The Soviets did the work and beat the Germans the second time.
edit on 14-4-2015 by ufoorbhunter because: Can't spell first time



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 05:07 PM
link   
Mods remove I pressed the button twice

edit on 14-4-2015 by ufoorbhunter because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2015 @ 06:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: mSparks43

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: mSparks43

Not if you dont have any AA cannons left surrounding youre exspensive missile system. Youre just being contrary now.

the typical route is high altitude attack of aa cannon to gain air superiority
followed by ground troops and helicopters.

no high altitude neutralisation of heavy assault weaponry and aa cannon.
means
no helicopters ground troops or low altitude attack

Iran hasn't started a war in over 400 years.
it's pretty clear who the aggressors are. (go Hillary!!)

and I wasn't dodging the 25km info.
first it's not true. range of each station is 125km for anything bigger than a small bird.

and second it's a grid. so 25km would just mean you need more antennas in the grid.

s300 is a system.
separate launchers. command post and radar units.

each command post is capable of protecting a land area twice that of Iran.


YEs sticking to a typical attack pattern very smart huh? Apaches have attacked AA connons before from low level usually outside the AA cannons range. Hellfires have a slight range advantage.

JAASM missiles also can be used too. link follows
JAASM

And YOU are NOT GRASPING WHAT I AM SAYING ABOUT THE F-22 DETECTION RANGE. in a NON JAMMING environment yeah it detects it out to 150-60 km. WITH JAMMING THOUGH its 25. Do you see what I am saying now?



posted on Apr, 15 2015 @ 01:19 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

so the f22 wasn't cancelled?

a reply to: cavtrooper7
start with
m.in.rbth.com...

then move on to the primary high altitude aa was the s300 system. not the migs confirming the kill.

and that "officially " no flights ever took place where they could have been shot down.
I did look on some Russian sites for the footage. but I tend to get distracted by more interesting things.
edit on 15-4-2015 by mSparks43 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2015 @ 01:58 AM
link   
a reply to: mSparks43

It was canceled at 183. It's been operational for years. It's flown against S-300s multiple times in testing against live systems.



posted on Apr, 15 2015 @ 03:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

indeed
didn't fair well
www.russiadefence.net...



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join