posted on Apr, 16 2015 @ 04:03 PM
originally posted by: mike dangerously
I'm waiting for the accusations of Senator Graham of being a "conspiracy monger" to come from the usual suspects.After all how dare he accuse our
valiant Saudi allies of such a thing didn't they buy,uh I mean didn't the FBI clear them as did the 9/11 commission?
Which is why this report can go either way really. I wouldn't assume his aim here is proving Saudi involvement. Or that it was covered up. Or even the
reasons for both. As most within higher governments, as well as here, already know this to be true to some extent. Outside of this court case for
surviving families, any wide-spread dissemination of this as part of a genuine "truther" movement, falls woefully short in that purpose, almost
Somebody other than terrorists with box-cutters allowed 9/11 to happen, somebody with tremendous influence, not at all limited to Saudi Arabia, as we
saw with NORAD/Thermite/Magic passports/Building 7/ETC. "Terrorists" who do this kind of things are all webbed up puppets and property of different
government superpowers. It's important to remember the US gov. recognizes a threat to our National Security & public stability much larger than
announcing our existing enemies as perpetrators, & that would be announcing it was found to be done by existing allies of ours. I'm sure there were
all sorts of secret dealings, and what-not, as well as, secret punishments & so forth I don't doubt. But I still have a huge problem with that. I'd
like to know if Mossad did it, even if half of the US disagrees. The word "terrorist" is a god damned Ace up every governments sleeve, to be played to
us. How do you like that?
Lastly, it could just be painted this way by the MSM. Yet I still doubt this Ex-Senator is in any accurate sense of the word; a "truther". Although he
might be helping certain surviving 9/11 victim family members to be getting compensation. The article seems to mark it as the center of the whole
story, although little talked about yet here. It seems Saudi involvement must be proven for those families claims to be ruled on in favor of their
compensation? Did I read that right? This I would love somebody to expand on. They were relying on FBI testimonies/etc for proving Saudi involvement
in the first place? Under a certain rule, they are allowed government compensation in the event of a terrorist attack? How does this Ex-Senator aim to
involve Saudi aiding 9/11 to pertain to this compensation law?
tl:dr - Articles good in forcing TBTB to admit more real truth, but it undermines the weight of evidence against real
perpetrators, or those superpowers that "allowed" 9/11 to happen. Most likely the real perpetrators gained the most from it. They would have a patsy
of course, as well as back-up patsies. Personally, my money is ofc on Mossad. Lastly, the main point of article seemed to escape most posters, and
that is the requirement of Saudi involvement to be proven with sensitive pending-evidence, to finally get compensation for 9/11 surviving families.
Anyone want to expand on the laws behind this?
edit on 16-4-2015 by Arrestme because: tl:dr option
16-4-2015 by Arrestme because: (no reason given)
edit on 16-4-2015 by Arrestme because: (no reason given)