It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
Why the hell aren't there swarms of LGBT bakeries opening up en masse?
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: mahatche
So because they didn't succeed and shutting some of them down, then that's acceptable?
That's your barometer on if it's okay or not?
I really have to start wondering what the hell people like yours thinking processes must be like
originally posted by: Seamrog
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
Why the hell aren't there swarms of LGBT bakeries opening up en masse?
Because the bigoted homosexualists are not interested in cakes or weddings or flowers.
But you knew that.
originally posted by: mahatche
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: mahatche
So because they didn't succeed and shutting some of them down, then that's acceptable?
That's your barometer on if it's okay or not?
I really have to start wondering what the hell people like yours thinking processes must be like
Yes, it is acceptable to stop supporting a business that says it doesn't want your business.
My thought process is called the free market. Letting self determination win is a vital part. If you don't support the people's right to not support something, you don't believe in the free market. A loss of support is the correcting mechanism.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
*snip*
And let's be honest, the gay community only reacts this way when the Christian community does something really stupid, like the Indiana law.
*snip*
~Tenth
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
Why does it seem that far-right Republicans want to be labeled "domestic terrorists"? They just keep getting crazier and more radical each and every day.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
Why does it seem that far-right Republicans want to be labeled "domestic terrorists"? They just keep getting crazier and more radical each and every day.
Huh? How does this equate to "far right republicans" wanting to be labeled domestic terrorist?
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
*snip*
And let's be honest, the gay community only reacts this way when the Christian community does something really stupid, like the Indiana law.
*snip*
~Tenth
Actually, the Indiana law was created in response to the actions of homosexual activists targeting Christian businesses and individuals, and anyone who dared to say they don't approve. These activists are among the most intolerant people around. They don't want equality; they want to force
WATCH: A Field Guide for Identifying Sneaky, Homophobic Laws Nice civil rights you've got there. Sure would be a shame if something happened to them. BY MATT BAUMEMARCH 06 2015
While LGBT Americans are busy celebrating the spread of marriage equality, homophobic lawmakers have yet another trick up their sleeve. A new trend hitting legislatures across the country: sneaky laws that erode civil rights for LGBT citzens without ever actually mentioning LGBT people, or even same-sex marriage. It's a clever strategic move, since it would be unconstitutional to call out gays and lesbians specifically in a law that revokes civil rights. So anti-equality politicians have figured out how to cleverly word new laws that still manage to target sexual orientation for discrimination. Some of these proposed new laws — like the one recently enacted in Arkansas — would make it against the law for towns to add new groups to nondiscrimination policies. Others follow Mississippi's lead, and would allow businesses and government employees to pick and choose which members of the public they'd serve. And some — like a bill passed last month in the North Carolina Senate — would even require public employees to discriminate against same-sex couples. What's so sneaky about these laws is that they look perfectly reasonable, since they never actually mention who the target is — instead, they claim to protect "religious liberty" or "sincerely held religious beliefs."
www.advocate.com...
Free market?
So actively trying to destroy shop owners w lawsuits and slander and threats to their businesses and person are free market practices?
Please sell that somewhere else
If they were interested in the free market handling it
1. They would just chalk it up to ignorance and go to another shop
2. They wouldn't be actively trying to destroy them
3. They would let the competition handle it because their businesses would get the traffic that the store who wouldn't make a cake for gays was turning away
Sell that somewhere else what they are doing isn't free market anything. It's intolerance on their part and targeting individuals to push their agenda
When they stop making cakes for divorced people getting remarried, then this "religious stand" tripe will make sense.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Sremmos80
When they stop making cakes for divorced people getting remarried, then this "religious stand" tripe will make sense.
Aaah possibly one of the best statements in this thread.
As others have stated many times, why serve other kinds of weddings that obviously the Bible and/or beliefs disagree with and not gay weddings? The answer is so obvious. They single out the gay people because of the ickness factor and not belief.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Sremmos80
When they stop making cakes for divorced people getting remarried, then this "religious stand" tripe will make sense.
Aaah possibly one of the best statements in this thread.
As others have stated many times, why serve other kinds of weddings that obviously the Bible and/or beliefs disagree with and not gay weddings? The answer is so obvious. They single out the gay people because of the ickness factor and not belief.
originally posted by: WhereAreTheGoodguys
Hypocrites and Bullies is all I see.
4% of the population.They get away with too much.