It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Millions of people DO NOT vanish every year.

page: 4
15
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 13 2015 @ 11:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: UnBreakable

i am not " getting huffy " - i have left that to you


i WAS just attempting to educate you - clearly a for forlonehope - but hey

its you who has compounded your inability to read or do basic mathematics - by spitting your dummy out

just admit you were wrong and move one



forlone? And you're going to educate me? You must have been absent from third grade the day they said forlone isn't a word. Your inability to use a word from the English language trumps my reading and basic mathematic deficiencies. Carry on, Jackwagon.

dictionary.reference.com...


So now that your argument has been proven wrong, you're going to resort to attacking the opposition's grammar?

Sore loser, much?

You could just act like an adult, accept that you're wrong, and move on with the knowledge that the world is not quite as dark a place as you thought when you believed in the millions and millions and millions of Illuminati child sex slaves/sacrifices/alien food.




posted on Apr, 13 2015 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Answer

ATS member " unbreakable " - or should it be uneducatable ?

wont like it - but scroll down to pg 79 for some REAL figures on open cases [ 1 year old ]

source

warning - requires reading comprehension and artithmetic


the TL;DR synopsis :

the " millions " is a number pulled out of doom porn merchants arses


Uh, they are REAL figures because you say so? You're using a European Union Commission report as a source? And they're supposed to be a more legitimate source than the one I provided? According to who, you?



posted on Apr, 13 2015 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: UnBreakable

i am not " getting huffy " - i have left that to you


i WAS just attempting to educate you - clearly a for forlonehope - but hey

its you who has compounded your inability to read or do basic mathematics - by spitting your dummy out

just admit you were wrong and move one



forlone? And you're going to educate me? You must have been absent from third grade the day they said forlone isn't a word. Your inability to use a word from the English language trumps my reading and basic mathematic deficiencies. Carry on, Jackwagon.

dictionary.reference.com...


So now that your argument has been proven wrong, you're going to resort to attacking the opposition's grammar?

Sore loser, much?

You could just act like an adult, accept that you're wrong, and move on with the knowledge that the world is not quite as dark a place as you thought when you believed in the millions and millions and millions of Illuminati child sex slaves/sacrifices/alien food.


Wait, now you're crying like a little girl because I attacked your grammar, after you previously attacked my reading comprehension and mathematics in numerous threads? You can't be serious, can you? Before you worry about educating me, educate yourself first.
edit on 13-4-2015 by UnBreakable because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2015 @ 11:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: UnBreakable

i am not " getting huffy " - i have left that to you


i WAS just attempting to educate you - clearly a for forlonehope - but hey

its you who has compounded your inability to read or do basic mathematics - by spitting your dummy out

just admit you were wrong and move one



forlone? And you're going to educate me? You must have been absent from third grade the day they said forlone isn't a word. Your inability to use a word from the English language trumps my reading and basic mathematic deficiencies. Carry on, Jackwagon.

dictionary.reference.com...


So now that your argument has been proven wrong, you're going to resort to attacking the opposition's grammar?

Sore loser, much?

You could just act like an adult, accept that you're wrong, and move on with the knowledge that the world is not quite as dark a place as you thought when you believed in the millions and millions and millions of Illuminati child sex slaves/sacrifices/alien food.


Wait, now you're crying like a little girl because I attacked your grammar, after you previously attacked my reading comprehension and mathematics in numerous threads? You can't be serious, can you? Before you worry about educating me, educate yourself first.


There goes that reading comprehension problem, again.

I'm not the one whose grammar you attacked. I'm merely calling you out for your childish behavior.

Whatever little spat you and "ignorant_ape" had going on before entering this thread is neither here nor there. You posted nonsense, your nonsense was questioned, you posted more nonsense to back up your nonsense, and that nonsense was proven to be total nonsense. Now you're butthurt and attacking another poster's grammar because you are losing the argument.

Fact: You have shown a reading comprehension problem in this thread.
Fact: You did not bother to do the math from the FBI report and wrongly stated the numbers of missing people.
Fact: Your source material is guilty of the same faulty logic you tried to use in the first place.
Fact: Your argument is dead and you attacked "ignorant_ape" for a spelling mistake.

You're letting your pride get in the way of rational behavior.



posted on Apr, 13 2015 @ 11:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Answer

ATS member " unbreakable " - or should it be uneducatable ?

wont like it - but scroll down to pg 79 for some REAL figures on open cases [ 1 year old ]

source

warning - requires reading comprehension and artithmetic


the TL;DR synopsis :

the " millions " is a number pulled out of doom porn merchants arses


Uh, they are REAL figures because you say so? You're using a European Union Commission report as a source? And they're supposed to be a more legitimate source than the one I provided? According to who, you?


Maybe according to the fact that the figures are not from a website devoted to blaming everything on the Illuminati?

Maybe according to the fact that the figures are not based on the exact same misinterpretation of the data that I've pointed out in this thread?

You posted an opinion piece from a moron on an Illuminati-bashing website that offered ZERO evidence for his claims.

Sorry, you lost this one.



posted on Apr, 13 2015 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: Answer

In 2014, 635,155 people were reported missing in the US. By the end of the year, 634,367 reports were cancelled due to the person being found or the report was determined to be invalid.


So according to your stats there's 635k people out of 300 mil missing in the US. If you extrapolate that % to 7 bil people worldwide, then yes, you would get a few million.


In 2014, 635,155 people were reported missing in the US. By the end of the year, 634,367 reports were cancelled due to the person being found or the report was determined to be invalid.

Do you even math, bro?


Don't arithmetic me, bro!




top topics
 
15
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join