It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, putting aside the violent reaction, should this production have been stopped?
Or should freedom of speech be allowed no matter who and how it offends?
Aside from the violent reaction, no this play should not be stopped. It is a work of FICTION....Artistic expression, and should not be hindered despite the reaction. Potential offence isnt the same as actual offence, so prior restraint should not be used to squelch artisdtic fiction.
TextSo, putting aside the violent reaction, should this production have been stopped? Or should freedom of speech be allowed no matter who and how it offends?
Originally posted by blobby
UK let them in, so they should live by OUR LAWS as its not their country is it? if we went to thier country im sure we would BE FORCED to FOLLOW their LAWS to the letter, but no here in UK we let em get away with rubbish an dictating their laws an stuff.
The manager of a second Birmingham theatre company says he is prepared to stage a play cancelled after a violent demonstration by the Sikh community.
Neal Foster, of the Birmingham Stage Company, said the decision to cancel the play had been made by "cowards".
He said he was now looking at staging the performance at the Old Rep Theatre.
Mr Foster said he hoped the Rep could be persuaded to reconsider its decision to drop Behzti, which was written by a Sikh woman.
Originally posted by Nerdling
I don't believe they should have cancelled the play. But I do acknowledge that the scene is in bad taste. I'm just unsure whether the author was TRYING to provoke this kind of response.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
This is the truth about freedom of speech in society, in reality, there are a lot of limitations on your thoughts, words and actions.
Hence, given this, the Sikhs are fully within their rights to protest. As are the Roman catholics who protest the depiction of Jesus as gay. The artists should be more responsible.
I disagree - you call it idealistic, but it's idealistic to assume that nothing nasty will ever get said or done.
I think the limitations are in the ears and eyes of those who are offended by speech. Especially art.
Hence, given this, the Sikhs are fully within their rights to protest. As are the Roman catholics who protest the depiction of Jesus as gay. The artists should be more responsible.
They are within their rights to protest. However artists should be the models for free speech and thought.
The protesters should be more productive.
See also - the old "two knobs on the radio" George Carlin bit... "One changes the channel, and one turns it off!"
Or in this case, don't go to the theatre.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Or in this case, don't go to the theatre.
No, I do not agree that apathy is the solution. What these protests are protesting against is their religious figures being abused and wrongly portrayed. They are within their rights too. In the same way you would be, if an artist portrayed you in a wrong and maligning way.
"The plan I came up with was to invite theatres across the country to read the play and discuss it afterwards, to have a debate so there was more understanding about the whole issue," he said.
"I was proceeding with these plans until last night, when I received a request from the author."
Mr Foster added that he had also received several threatening phone calls.
Originally posted by blobby
UK let them in, so they should live by OUR LAWS as its not their country is it?
tartessian
Im totally with the Sikh's on this one.
indigo-child
Hence, given this, the Sikhs are fully within their rights to protest.
kriz_4
This move was by the request of the play writer Gurpreet Kaur Bhatt after she recieved threats, she fears for her safety
Sikh's are remarkably calm and non violent, i assume if they were this angry its because they had a good reason. Im totally with the Sikh's on this one. Artists should be free to express themselvs but there comes a time when you have to draw a line. from what i heard the artists involved are ex-Sikh influenced by english cultural ideas aparently bent on giving lectures to the Sikh. Again, don't mess with the Sikhs and the Sikhs won't mess with you.
Its that simple, really.
Firstly, Sikhs are not a warrior class, nor have do they or scripture consider themselves as such --this is dogma.
Originally posted by ZeroDeep
Firstly, Sikhs are not a warrior class, nor have do they or scripture consider themselves as such --this is dogma.