It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Child abuse laws are already in place to prevent parents from abusing children.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
It's a good thing there's this pesky little document called "The Constitution" preventing a "Religious Nutter" president from turning America into a theocracy.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Gryphon66
What you myopic posters don't "get" is that all this government over-reach is eventually going to bite YOU in the ass!
If we ever get a religious nutter in the Whitehouse, it'll be you screeching about government overreach, but it'll be too late then.
Show me where in the Constitution that government can dictate to a parent how to raise their children.
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: beezzer
I agree that the government shouldnt interfer with adults wanting this therapy, but children should not forced into something because of their parents beliefs.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Child abuse laws are already in place to prevent parents from abusing children.
If you're driving your kid to suicide by forcing them to attend "therapy" because you mistakenly believe that homosexuality is a mental disorder, that's abuse.
Pretty simply. For one, Homosexuality is no longer classed as a mental disorder by the U.S. Government. So any "therapy" to reverse that is quackery.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: beezzer
I agree that the government shouldnt interfer with adults wanting this therapy, but children should not forced into something because of their parents beliefs.
I guess local police cannot stop crimes?
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: beezzer
I agree that the government shouldnt interfer with adults wanting this therapy, but children should not forced into something because of their parents beliefs.
I guess local police cannot stop crimes?
A loaded question or complex question fallacy is a question which contains a controversial or unjustified assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt).
Aside from being an informal fallacy depending on usage, such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda.
The traditional example is the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: Gryphon66
"Show me in the Constitution where rape is against the law."
"Show me in the Constitution where murder is against the law."
What a specious argument.
I didn't bring it up.
originally posted by: windword
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: beezzer
I agree that the government shouldnt interfer with adults wanting this therapy, but children should not forced into something because of their parents beliefs.
I guess local police cannot stop crimes?
Local police can only stop crimes that are defined by LAWS that are enacted by the government!
originally posted by: greencmp
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: beezzer
I agree that the government shouldnt interfer with adults wanting this therapy, but children should not forced into something because of their parents beliefs.
I guess local police cannot stop crimes?
Childcare is obviously a federal issue. Indeed, it would seem that everything is the responsibility of the national government even though it is actually impossible for any government to oversee.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: Gryphon66
"Show me in the Constitution where rape is against the law."
"Show me in the Constitution where murder is against the law."
What a specious argument.
I didn't bring it up.
Dishonesty now?
Did someone else type in under your member name?
Yes, you did bring it up. And you know it's horsepucks.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Child abuse laws are already in place to prevent parents from abusing children.
Then why do we need more from the federal government?
If you're driving your kid to suicide by forcing them to attend "therapy" because you mistakenly believe that homosexuality is a mental disorder, that's abuse.
And local authorities are helpless. And every child that goes through this dies horribly.
Pretty simply. For one, Homosexuality is no longer classed as a mental disorder by the U.S. Government. So any "therapy" to reverse that is quackery.
I might attend therapy to quit smoking. Quackery as well?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: beezzer
You glorify and praise government stepping in and making sweeping determinations on how a parent can and should raise their child(ren).
Are you the kind of person, who, if you see a parent abusing their child, you will just walk on b and not interfere, because parents own their children and have the right to treat them however they see fit?
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: Gryphon66
"Show me in the Constitution where rape is against the law."
"Show me in the Constitution where murder is against the law."
What a specious argument.
I didn't bring it up.
Dishonesty now?
Did someone else type in under your member name?
Yes, you did bring it up. And you know it's horsepucks.
No. I'm just looking at this issue in a broader sense. I don't have an emotional stake in this so I can look at it subjectively.
Unlike you.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: greencmp
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: beezzer
I agree that the government shouldnt interfer with adults wanting this therapy, but children should not forced into something because of their parents beliefs.
I guess local police cannot stop crimes?
Childcare is obviously a federal issue. Indeed, it would seem that everything is the responsibility of the national government even though it is actually impossible for any government to oversee.
No one has said anything here that suggests that "everything is the responsibility of the national government."