It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If Bill Gates owns Fort Knox, then he is rich.
Bill Gates is rich.
Therefore, Bill Gates owns Fort Knox.
originally posted by: CryHavoc
I saw this on another board and though it appropriate to ask here.
If a Christian baker selling a gay couple a wedding cake means the Christian baker participated in a gay marriage, then does a Christian gun seller selling a gun to someone who then commits murder with that gun mean that the Christian gun seller participated in a murder?
(I hope I have this in the right forum)
originally posted by: infolurker
Throw the word "Knowingly" in there and you have your answer.
originally posted by: kruphix
Isn't every cake a Christian bakery sells contributing to someone's gluttony?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
In the world of logical thinking, the question you pose presents an Affirming The Consequent logical fallacy.
originally posted by: CryHavoc
If a Christian baker selling a gay couple a wedding cake means the Christian baker participated in a gay marriage, then does a Christian gun seller selling a gun to someone who then commits murder with that gun mean that the Christian gun seller participated in a murder?
If (a Christian baker selling a gay couple a wedding cake) implies (the Christian baker participated in gay marriage)
Then (a Christian gun seller selling a gun to someone who then commits murder with that gun) implies (the Christian gun seller participated in murder)
if (person selling item) implies (participation in activity item is used in)
then (person selling item) implies (participation in activity item is used in)
If p → q
Then p → q