It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFOs Disable Nuclear Missiles And Weapons Systems

page: 3
14
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 6 2015 @ 09:41 AM
link   
When I think of ufo's having a direct effect on missiles at US bases I think of this one. Strange lights in the sky were seen by a large number of personnel at the base. And at least one of the ufo's was seen hovering over one of the nuclear silos. During the subsequent investigation, no known reason was found that would have caused 10 missiles to go offline. Lightning and any problems with the commercial power system, was also ruled out.




posted on May, 27 2015 @ 11:23 AM
link   
Here's a ufo intelligence summary of reports produced for the Nuclear Connection Project originally from the NICAP Website.

1.Report Sep., 1944; Oak Ridge, TN. Metal tube hovers over gaseous diffusion plant
2.Report Mid-July,1945; Hanford, WA. UFO over AEC plant tracked by radar, F84's scrambled
3.Report April 5, 1948; White Sands, NM. Team watched UFO performing violent maneuvers
4.Report July 1948; Pasco, WA. Pilot reports domed disc near AEC area
5.Report Dec. 5,6,7,8,11,13,14,20 & 28, 1948; Los Alamos, NM. OSI, pilots, Los Alamos
6.Report April 24, 1949; Arrey, New Mexico. UFO tracking at White Sands Proving Ground
7.Report May 21, 1949; Moses AFB/Hanford, WA. Disc hov. restricted air space over AEC Plant
8.Report June 29, 1949; White Sands, NM. Naval rocket expert observed a silvery disc
9.Report Fall, 1949; Key Atomic Base. 5 metallic objects traverse 300 miles across scope
10.Report April 27, 1950; White Sands, NM. Cinetheodolite film taken by camera trk station
11.Report May 24, 1950; White Sands, NM. Cinetheodolite film taken by camera trk station
12.Report July 30, 1950; Hanford AEC Plant, WA. UFO over AEC plant triggers scramble of F-94
13.Report Oct. 13, 1950; Oak Ridge, TN. Sightings by AEC security patrols
14.Report Oct. 18, 1950; Oak Ridge, TN. Unidentified radar contacts
15.Report Oct. 20, 1950; Oak Ridge, TN. UFOs sighted over "Control Zone"
16.Report November 10, 1950; Oak Ridge, TN. Backgrnd radiation regist as object in control area
17.Report December 5, 1950; Oak Ridge, TN. FBI document, possible radar jamming reported
18.Report December 6, 1950; Northeastern U.S.. National alert when radar picked up unknowns
19.Report December 14, 1950; Oak Ridge, TN. RADAR targets over AEC base
20.Report December 18, 1950; Oak Ridge, TN. R/V Sightings over AEC plant
21.Report December 18, 1950; NEPA, Oak Ridge, TN. Army report to FBI
22.Report December 20, 1950; Oak Ridge, TN. AN&C Radar tracks UFO
23.Report October 9, 1951; Hulman Fld (IN); Paris (IL); Newport atomic plant Unknown
24.Report October 30, 1951; Yucca Flats, NV. Squadrons of UFOs over atomic test site
25.Report December 7, 1951; Oak Ridge, TN. 20' square obs by secty guard; F-47's scrambled
26.Report May 10, 1952; SC. UFO Incident at Savannah River (AEC) Plant
27.Report Summer of 1952; Kirtland AFB, NM. Famous AF F-86 shooting incident
28.Report June 21, 1952; Oak Ridge, TN. R/V sightings over AEC plant
29.Report July 5, 1952; Hanford Atomic Plant, WA. Four pilots rep disc hov over AEC plant
30.Report Sept, 1952; Oper. Mainbrace, North Sea area/military exercise Ruppelt's version
31.Report December 10, 1952; Washington state, Hanford AEC Plant, R/V
32.Report July 19, 1953; Oak Ridge, TN. Black objects maneuvered over area near an F-86
33.Report April 7, 1954; USS Curtiss carrying nuclear weapons buzzed by UFO
34.Report October 1, 1957; Shippingport, PA. UFO circled atomic plant
35.Report November 4, 1957; Kirtland AFB, NM. Egg-shaped UFO hovers over base
36.Report November 6, 1957; Radium Springs, NM. Rnd object rose verticalfrom mountain top
37.Report February, 1961; Western Europe, France. DDisc near nuclear power station
38.Report Summer of 1961; Near Moscow. Report of Russian tact missiles being fired on UFO
39.Report August 7, 1962; Oracle, Arizona. UFO over Titan missile silo, Jets sent up
40.Report October, 1962; NORAD Reg 2, nr Palermo AFB, NY. Scramb hot bird Cuban Missile Crisis
41.Report 1962; Unidentified A.F. Test Range, UFO blocked tracking of U.S. rocket
42.Report February 7, 1963; Charlottesville, VA. Planes scrambled, UFOs over missile site.
43.Report April 30, 1964; Stallion Test Site, NM. B-57 radios white object landed, phto recon
44.Report May 15, 1964; Stallion Site, NM. Two scrambles, radar/vis, UFOs sent proper IFF.
45.Report May 22, 1964; White Sands, NM. Auto radar tracks UFO on tape, sends phony IFF.
46.Report September 15, 1964; Big Sur, CA. Destroys Atlas warhead, filmed by mil trk crew
47.Report June 5, 1965; Lynn/Nahant, MA. UFOs over GE facility.
48.Report October, 1965; Lake Norman, NC. Three UFOs over McGuire Nuclear Power Station
49.Report October 7, 1965; Edwards AFB, CA. Encounter between UFO and a hot bird
50.Report April, 1966; Malmstrom AFB, MT. UFOs, alarms, 10 missiles inoperative.
51.Report June 16, 1966; Elista, Kalmuk, Russia. Scientist report UFO maneuv nr missile test.
52.Report August 24,1966; North Dakota. UFO jammed a Minuteman site
53.Report February 10, 1967; Sandusky, OH. Saucer hovers over AEC facility with blue beam.
54.Report March 2, 1967; White Sands, NM. 20 silver objects, radar blips at 7 mile alt.
55.Report March 5, 1967; Minot AFB, North Dakota. Craft trk on radar hovered over missile site
56.Report March 16, 1967; Malmstrom AFB, MT. UFO and "no-go Fault" cond at missile facility
57.Report March 24, 1967; Los Alamos, NM. Disc hovers for 10 minutes.
58.Report March 30, 1967; Malmstrom AFB, MT. Radar/visual, UFO 10 missiles shut down.
59.Report October 26, 1967; Portland, England. Cylinder w/ 4 arms over nuc plant, A-R.
60.Report Late Summer, 1968; Lake Norman, NC. Domed UFO near AEC plant
61.Report September 17, 1968; Nellis AFB, NV. Two military ATCs report violent maneuvers.
62.Report July or August, 1972; Lake Norman, NC. Saucer near nuclear facility
63.Report March 1975; Lake Murray, Lexington, SC. CE with octagon near nuclear site
64.Report October 27, 1975; Loring AFB, Maine. UFO circles weapons storage area
65.Report October 30, 1975; Wurtsmith AFB Michigan. UFO chased by KC-135 tanker
66.Report Late October 1975; Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado. Night NORAD went on top alert
67.Report November 7, 1975; Malmstrom AFB, Montana. Targeting system tampered with
68.Report November 8, 1975; Malmstrom AFB, Montana. F-106's scrambled after UFOs
69.Report November 22, 1975; Savannah, Georgia. Pilots observe UFO near nuclear plant
70.Report August 9, 1980; Albuquerque, NM, UFO landing near Kirtland, AFB
71.Report October 18, 1982; Lake Norman, NC. Silver oval UFO with "four legs"
72.Report October 13, 1983; Gaffney, SC. UFO near Cherokee Nuclear Station
73.Report June 24, 1984; Peekskill, NY. UFO over nuc plant causes alert and elect failure
74.Report April 26, 1986; USSR. Chernobyl explosion at 1:23 AM, preceded by UFO activity
75.Report March 4, 1988; Eastlake, OH. Triangular objects hd toward Perry nuclear power plant
76.Report April 22, 1998; Washington State. UFOs sighted at sub base and nuc storage facilityshington State. UFOs sighted at sub base and nuc storage facility

Most of the reports can be read about here by clicking on the highlighted "Report" link.



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 11:31 AM
link   
But why should I believe that it's aliens from outer space?



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 11:36 AM
link   
Particularly interesting to me are those reports where things like this happen:


One feature of these reports suggesting a direct link deals with light rays or energy beams being focused on nuclear materials.(3) Multiple independent accounts state that beams of light were directed downward from the UFOs onto the nuclear storage bunkers and underground missile silos, perhaps penetrating them beneath the surface. (4) (5)
From Same Link Above

While many may bicker over the validity and authenticity of specific cases, the sheer volume of these occurrences as a whole demands attention. Safe to say that these cases of strongly suggested off world UFOs affiliated with nuclear weapons can not be ignored or denied any longer.



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 11:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: OhOkYeah
But why should I believe that it's aliens from outer space?


You have a better explanation?



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 04:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueMessiah

originally posted by: OhOkYeah
But why should I believe that it's aliens from outer space?


You have a better explanation?


Shadow government



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: OhOkYeah

originally posted by: TrueMessiah

originally posted by: OhOkYeah
But why should I believe that it's aliens from outer space?


You have a better explanation?


Shadow government


Now explain why the shadow gov. is so concerned with hovering at and around nuclear facilities, and how they manage to disable fighter jet controls when these jets are scrambled to confront them. Also provide an explanation as to how the shadow gov. had these capabilities dating as far back as the late 1940s.



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 06:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueMessiah

originally posted by: OhOkYeah

originally posted by: TrueMessiah

originally posted by: OhOkYeah
But why should I believe that it's aliens from outer space?


You have a better explanation?


Shadow government


Now explain why the shadow gov. is so concerned with hovering at and around nuclear facilities, and how they manage to disable fighter jet controls when these jets are scrambled to confront them. Also provide an explanation as to how the shadow gov. had these capabilities dating as far back as the late 1940s.


Well that's my point. But it's less of a stretch to say that some shadow government is pranking the nuclear facilities than it is to assume it's space aliens. I haven't seen any reasonable explanation that would lead me to believe it was aliens over other, simpler explanations.

The likelihood of good guy ETs popping in just to mess with our nuclear capabilities is slim to none. Where were they when Japan was getting nuked?



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: OhOkYeah

Japan getting nuked, wasn't going to destroy the Biosphere, it would have been a salutary lesson, which it was. Now the nuclear arsenal could do for a few planets with heaps left over. Whoever is messing with the Silos, is sending a message . That reads something like" its not your Biosphere to destroy". Therefore its someone with a vested interest in the Biosphere continuing as it has always done. For the purpose that it was always intended too ,the fact that we are to dumb to comprehend, that purpose is neither here nor there. The purpose is "life" because that's what a balanced Biosphere creates . So someone is protecting "life" in spite of ourselves.



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: OhOkYeah

originally posted by: TrueMessiah

originally posted by: OhOkYeah

originally posted by: TrueMessiah

originally posted by: OhOkYeah
But why should I believe that it's aliens from outer space?


You have a better explanation?


Shadow government


Now explain why the shadow gov. is so concerned with hovering at and around nuclear facilities, and how they manage to disable fighter jet controls when these jets are scrambled to confront them. Also provide an explanation as to how the shadow gov. had these capabilities dating as far back as the late 1940s.


Well that's my point. But it's less of a stretch to say that some shadow government is pranking the nuclear facilities than it is to assume it's space aliens. I haven't seen any reasonable explanation that would lead me to believe it was aliens over other, simpler explanations.

The likelihood of good guy ETs popping in just to mess with our nuclear capabilities is slim to none. Where were they when Japan was getting nuked?


It seems as if you're in the camp that just can't fathom something like this being possible but if you were to thoroughly research this phenomenon you would see that it isn't that much of a stretch at all. The gov. pranking nuclear facilities year after year for decades sounds extremely inconceivable in it's own right, especially with no motives given to back that claim up. These craft were performing maneuvers that defy physics and were disabling weapons systems and missiles. I just don't see how those reports (look at that list I posted) can be overlooked like that. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction.

It is generally thought that those nukes sent out a signal and precipitated ET visitation. UFO flaps started to appear shortly after that.



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueMessiah

originally posted by: OhOkYeah

originally posted by: TrueMessiah

originally posted by: OhOkYeah

originally posted by: TrueMessiah

originally posted by: OhOkYeah
But why should I believe that it's aliens from outer space?


You have a better explanation?


Shadow government


Now explain why the shadow gov. is so concerned with hovering at and around nuclear facilities, and how they manage to disable fighter jet controls when these jets are scrambled to confront them. Also provide an explanation as to how the shadow gov. had these capabilities dating as far back as the late 1940s.


Well that's my point. But it's less of a stretch to say that some shadow government is pranking the nuclear facilities than it is to assume it's space aliens. I haven't seen any reasonable explanation that would lead me to believe it was aliens over other, simpler explanations.

The likelihood of good guy ETs popping in just to mess with our nuclear capabilities is slim to none. Where were they when Japan was getting nuked?


It seems as if you're in the camp that just can't fathom something like this being possible but if you were to thoroughly research this phenomenon you would see that it isn't that much of a stretch at all. The gov. pranking nuclear facilities year after year for decades sounds extremely inconceivable in it's own right, especially with no motives given to back that claim up. These craft were performing maneuvers that defy physics and were disabling weapons systems and missiles. I just don't see how those reports (look at that list I posted) can be overlooked like that. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction.

It is generally thought that those nukes sent out a signal and precipitated ET visitation. UFO flaps started to appear shortly after that.



I suppose it's difficult to find any credible sources for information supporting the theory that it is ET behind the incidents. There's a lot of woo-woo out there. I haven't had the pleasure of viewing a video or seeing any empirical data that backs up the theory. At least not yet. I would prefer the ET theory, to be honest. It's much more fascinating to me, and has more implications for the future of mankind if it were true. However, I have to put my own feelings aside and judge it for myself which leads me to lean towards the simpler possibilities.

Will be looking over the reports you listed over the next day or two to see if I can find a more terrestrial explanation.



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 09:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: OhOkYeah

Japan getting nuked, wasn't going to destroy the Biosphere, it would have been a salutary lesson, which it was. Now the nuclear arsenal could do for a few planets with heaps left over. Whoever is messing with the Silos, is sending a message . That reads something like" its not your Biosphere to destroy". Therefore its someone with a vested interest in the Biosphere continuing as it has always done. For the purpose that it was always intended too ,the fact that we are to dumb to comprehend, that purpose is neither here nor there. The purpose is "life" because that's what a balanced Biosphere creates . So someone is protecting "life" in spite of ourselves.


Isn't it more likely, although less interesting, that it's a terrestrial observer rather than an extraterrestrial observer? There could very well be a shadow organization which is behind it. Shouldn't we rule out the simpler explanations before going after the infinitely more complicated explanations? Why not time travelling humans with ancient technology?



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 10:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Bybyots

There are few UFO cases I am aware of (Trumbull OH, Levelland TX, one or two others I cant remember) where the car/truck engine is shut off and then comes back on as the UFO leaves. Have you formed an opinion about these cases?

Some people think it is an ecm, but that doesnt really account for the engines restarting without ignition.


edit on 27-5-2015 by 111DPKING111 because: with to without



posted on May, 27 2015 @ 10:31 PM
link   
a reply to: OhOkYeah

Agreed the scenario most likely is that its their home as well. The vested interest being not some benign presence wanting to save us from ourselves . But wanting to save themselves, from the collateral damage, in the event.



posted on May, 28 2015 @ 07:49 PM
link   
We alerted ET by stupidly and openly broadcasting radio waves out into space which by now have formed a wave-front bubble 116 light years radius with Earth at its center. Kepler has found HUNDREDS of planets within this area. There are planets out there receiving radio & TV signals we openly transmitted. I have a sinking feeling this will turn out to be our demise.



posted on May, 28 2015 @ 08:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnonymousRider
We alerted ET by stupidly and openly broadcasting radio waves out into space which by now have formed a wave-front bubble 116 light years radius with Earth at its center. Kepler has found HUNDREDS of planets within this area. There are planets out there receiving radio & TV signals we openly transmitted. I have a sinking feeling this will turn out to be our demise.

That would imply that any intelligent beings residing on planets within that "bubble" also use radio wave technology. If that's the case, why haven't we received any of their signals?



posted on Jul, 28 2017 @ 03:16 PM
link   
Anti-genetic weapon research in the west looks more and more like a Nazi experiment to demonstrate a race to be superior rather then actually being a weapon. In other words, it sounds more like propaganda ... just like Goebbels.

The west, just needs to remember ... it's technology, being significantly inferior to other world power, due to their decades long austerity, will be systematically outclassed. Any weapon the west presents will meet it's match.
edit on 28-7-2017 by Flanker86 because: c



posted on Jul, 28 2017 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Flanker86

Sounds just like Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Georgy Malenkov, Nikita Khrushchev, Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov, Konstantin Chernenko, Mikhail Gorbachev, Gennady Yanayev, Boris Yeltsin and the current loon in charge Vladimir Putin.

The USSR failed... You should let Putin know since he seems to think it still exists.



posted on Jul, 29 2017 @ 03:01 AM
link   
These nuclear connected cases are among the best documented cases in terms of highly credible witnesses.
The only explanation that seem to fit is the extraterrestial visitation hypothesis.

Ball lightning? Read up on the subject please. People are reporting lights and metallic objects.
Our own goverments doing this to themselves? Why would they?
Shadow Government? We have a shadow government who has had flying saucer technology since the 40ies?



posted on Jul, 29 2017 @ 03:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: AnonymousRider
We alerted ET by stupidly and openly broadcasting radio waves out into space which by now have formed a wave-front bubble 116 light years radius with Earth at its center. Kepler has found HUNDREDS of planets within this area. There are planets out there receiving radio & TV signals we openly transmitted. I have a sinking feeling this will turn out to be our demise.

That would imply that any intelligent beings residing on planets within that "bubble" also use radio wave technology. If that's the case, why haven't we received any of their signals?


They could easily just be listening to incoming signals, while shielding their own usage of signals technology so they remain privatized.
This is how powerful earth people like JP Morgan and other historical figures made their way to the top, They made knowing about what everyone else was doing, while hiding what they were doing.



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join