It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Significantly, the UFO activity occasionally transcends mere surveillance and involves direct and unambiguous interference with our strategic weapons systems. Numerous cases include reports of mysterious malfunctions of large numbers of nuclear missiles just as one or more UFOs hovered nearby.” (Declassified Soviet Ministry of Defense documents confirm that such incidents also occurred in the former USSR.)
- Robert Hastings
“An airman with the Oscar Flight Launch Control Center (LCC) saw a star-like object zigzagging high above him. Soon, a larger and closer light also appeared and acted in a similar way. The airman called his non-commissioned officer, and the two men watched the lights streak through the sky, maneuvering in impossible ways. The NCO phoned his commander, Lieutenant Robert Salas, who was not impressed. He ordered the NCO to keep watching the display and report back if the objects got any closer. Minutes later that is precisely what happened. Shouting into the phone, the NCO told Salas that a red, glowing UFO was hovering outside the front gate.
Salas woke his commander, Lieutenant Fred Meiwald. As he briefed Meiwald, an alarm went off in the small capsule, and both men saw a “No-Go” light turn on for one of the missiles. Within seconds, about ten of the missiles went down in succession. Twenty miles away, at the Echo Launch Control Center, the same scenario took place.
Strike teams were sent to the two launch facilities, where maintenance crews were at work and had been watching UFOs hover over each of their sites. The missiles were down for most of the day. Neither the Air Force invesigation, nor Boeing’s tests found any cause for the shutdown.”
At 0130 hrs on the 19th the F-4 took off and proceeded to a point about 40 NM (nautical miles-Ed.) North of Tehran. Due to its
brilliance the object was easily visible from 70 miles away. As the F-4 approached a range of 25 NM he lost all instrumentation and communications (UHF and intercom). He broke off the intercept and headed back to Shahrokhi. When the F-4 turned away from the object and apparently was no longer a threat to it the aircraft regained all instrumentation and communications.
Defense Intelligence Agency Document
At 0140 hrs a second F-4 was launched. This second object headed straight toward the F-4 at a very fast rate of speed. The pilot attempted to fire an AIM-9 missile at the object but at that Instant his weapons control panel went off and he lost all communications (UHF and Interphone). At this point the pilot initiated a turn and negative G dive to get away. As he turned the object fell in trail at what appeared to be about 3-4 NM as he continued ln his turn away from the primary object the second object went to the inside of his turn then returned to the primary object for a perfect rejoin.
originally posted by: roadgravel
ATS thread on the incident reported by Robert Jacobs
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: TrueMessiah
It could also be "Ball lightening" Getting close to an electrical source and doing a EMP. on it. Which would tend to cause a rapid shutdown. The same effect could short circuit the brain, and as we all know, the gaps would get filled in with all types of dream sequences. Again its all a bit ambiguous, and might even be designed to look that way.
originally posted by: TrueMessiah
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: TrueMessiah
It could also be "Ball lightening" Getting close to an electrical source and doing a EMP. on it. Which would tend to cause a rapid shutdown. The same effect could short circuit the brain, and as we all know, the gaps would get filled in with all types of dream sequences. Again its all a bit ambiguous, and might even be designed to look that way.
Ball lightening? Not the most probable cause. There are no reports of these incidents occurring during thunderstorms where ball lightening is prevalent. To add, here is Hastings at the conference attesting to interviewing up to 120 military personnel and their descriptions of the UFOs sighted during the disabling (hovering, silent, navigation defying the laws of physics) don't match ball lightening at all.
originally posted by: universalbri
Do you understand that the light in your television comes from an interactive process which processes information from energy to light in a stabilized black hole?
"Now what I saw that day was something shooting down a dummy nuclear warhead"
"What message would I interpret from that?", " Don't mess with nuclear warheads"
-Professor Robert Jacobs
originally posted by: anonentity
originally posted by: TrueMessiah
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: TrueMessiah
It could also be "Ball lightening" Getting close to an electrical source and doing a EMP. on it. Which would tend to cause a rapid shutdown. The same effect could short circuit the brain, and as we all know, the gaps would get filled in with all types of dream sequences. Again its all a bit ambiguous, and might even be designed to look that way.
Ball lightening? Not the most probable cause. There are no reports of these incidents occurring during thunderstorms where ball lightening is prevalent. To add, here is Hastings at the conference attesting to interviewing up to 120 military personnel and their descriptions of the UFOs sighted during the disabling (hovering, silent, navigation defying the laws of physics) don't match ball lightening at all.
Yes but what about the psychological effects on the observers, if the electrical effect, interfered with the observers perception, it wouldn't be to long before they came to a consensus on reality. I can see that an orb zigzagging at a distance can be fairly innocuous, but when electrical disruption of an observers brain becomes relevant. Then all observations are compromised. The first thing would be agreed was that it was a UFO. which indeed it was. Their may or may not, be missing time as, it would be if consciousness was disrupted.
In a nutshell, the Atlas launch to the Kwajalein atoll included deployment of two decoy reentry vehicles (RVs) intended to confuse enemy defensive radars.
Our photography showed that the decoys did not deploy properly after the main propulsion phase ended and were surrounded by pieces of Styrofoam packing from their launch tubes. Thus, the “real” warhead, released before the decoys and without the packing, stuck out like a sore thumb.
The Strategic Air Command (SAC) headquarter analysts subsequently recognized this as a shortcoming of a major weapons system and classified the film as top secret. Film footage seen up to the time of this new classification was the origin of Jacobs’s fantasy, as his security level was not high enough to handle the film or talk about it after re-classification. Nor was mine, at that time, but my clearance level was increased very soon thereafter.
www.csicop.org...
originally posted by: Bybyots
a reply to: TrueMessiah
"Now what I saw that day was something shooting down a dummy nuclear warhead"
"What message would I interpret from that?", " Don't mess with nuclear warheads"
-Professor Robert Jacobs
Unless thay are dummy nuclear warheads?
Based on everything I have learned since I stsrated hanging around ATS. I would say that Prof. Bob Jacobs is another victime of ECM + CIA = UFO.
The way that he presents it, his answer "It looks to me like we got a UFO" was entirely solicited from him by people that had no reason to solicit that statement from him as he was "the only one that saw it".
No one else saw it because Bob Jacobs was singled out to "see it".
...there are UFOs (non CIA related, I saw the link ) shutting these missles down.
originally posted by: TrueMessiah
Here is my favorite case told by professor Robert Jacobs of a nuclear warhead being intercepted and disabled in sub space by a UFO.