It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: draknoir2
Silver chose not to publish in a scientific imprint, wanting to inspire open debate.
Yeah. He chose not to seek peer review.
“Little in the book can be proven - it can only be supposed or suspected. But there is more than enough indisputable evidence to make further study worthwhile.”
There is more than enough indisputable evidence that little in the book can be proven, I suppose or suspect.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: draknoir2
Silver chose not to publish in a scientific imprint, wanting to inspire open debate.
Yeah. He chose not to seek peer review.
“Little in the book can be proven - it can only be supposed or suspected. But there is more than enough indisputable evidence to make further study worthwhile.”
There is more than enough indisputable evidence that little in the book can be proven, I suppose or suspect.
I had to wonder if the ecologist might be slightly out of his field of expertise.
But what you said too.
originally posted by: intrptr
his book aims to provoke debate -
Well lets see, what are the requirements for interstellar travelers to "seed" planets that are capable of sustaining life?
If I was in that business I would need a big sack of seeds, a few eggs and embryos (in cryo-storage), some beings capable of reproducing (wombs are mandatory), to get things started.
A lab to manipulate the DNA and diversify life, producing different strains and subspecies once the tree begins producing.
Then we need green houses, gardeners, maybe a whirling dervish to keep people from snacking on the juicy embryonic fruit hanging from the tree of life…
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
Here's what really blows my mind, Hydrogen atoms in water in our bodies was formed way back from the Big Bang. Hydrogen atoms don't come from the earth and sea; they came from the early universe. So essentially, the atoms in my very fingers and toes are over 13 billion years old.
“Lizards can sunbathe for as long as they like - and many of them do. We can just about get away with it for a week or two. But day after day in the sun? Forget it.
originally posted by: tanka418
Now that that is out of the way; there is evidence extant that may show that the Human genome was altered, perhaps significantly, around 8000 (or so) years ago. If One looks into the development and evolution of the male Y-DNA this can be seen.
originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: Telos
Sounds logical. Why would Earth nature produce us humans which seem to be nothing but a giant poisonous burden on the rest of the ecology of this planet? We don't belong here. We're an infestation of an otherwise rich and harmonious ecosystem. A plague.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
Decent minds think alike...
I've been looking for those myself.
It's barely conceivable that a PhD in (presumably) ecology could be so far off beam and so thoroughly. He apparently ran a Texas marine park that was ruined by Hurricane Ike.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
Also, if I just go out into the sun without a tolerance to it, my pale skin does get burnt to a crisp, but once I get a tolerance to the sun, my skin just goes golden brown and I can walk around without a top or sunscreen for 12 hours a day in a desert type environment without an issue.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
.a reply to: Telos
Can't find any academic credentials that would indicate his hypothesis is anything but rectally sourced.