It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: anonentity
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: anonentity
I think the rules and responsibilities enumerated by The Bill Of Rights relates to the government, not the people. So certainly one would expect that someone in a place to fall under the auspices of Constitutional control to have read and understand the rules and responsibilities of what they are to be doing in their duties of sworn office.
But as it relates to the gist of where you are going (or, where I believe you are going), the only thing the 2nd Amendment stipulates is that any able bodies male over the age of 18 has a right to keep and bear arms. I would surmise that the Equal Rights Amendment extends this to able bodied women over 18, as well as non able bodied of either gender.
Yes able bodied, would be of sound mind as well I guess, because to be able bodied you would have to have a sound mind. This would exempt a few.
originally posted by: greencmp
originally posted by: anonentity
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: anonentity
I think the rules and responsibilities enumerated by The Bill Of Rights relates to the government, not the people. So certainly one would expect that someone in a place to fall under the auspices of Constitutional control to have read and understand the rules and responsibilities of what they are to be doing in their duties of sworn office.
But as it relates to the gist of where you are going (or, where I believe you are going), the only thing the 2nd Amendment stipulates is that any able bodies male over the age of 18 has a right to keep and bear arms. I would surmise that the Equal Rights Amendment extends this to able bodied women over 18, as well as non able bodied of either gender.
Yes able bodied, would be of sound mind as well I guess, because to be able bodied you would have to have a sound mind. This would exempt a few.
The second amendment is a preexisting negative right which is not to be "infringed".
It has no qualifications.
It is a settled matter as far as the federal government is concerned. The states themselves have their own laws which may overlap or veer away from the intention. There are even some downright anti second amendment laws in some states. They need to be individually challenged in each case, that's how it works here.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Vasa Croe
As a non American , i think the right to carry arms takes the war on terror and criminals back to where it belongs, that is to every sane and able citizen . But even the most hardened sceptic has to agree that their are a lot of idiots out there.
As it is the "Constitution" that gives the citizen the right to carry, I think every one must read and understand it first before they have the right to carry. If not it would just be many stray bullets flying around.
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I know tons of kids like that. To be quite honest growing up it really didn't matter what family you had or culture you lived 95% of us knew better than to muck about with guns unless we had a valid reason to. I got my first .22 rifle at about 8 years old. My grandfather held onto it and took me shooting any time I asked. At about 12-13 years old I was allowed to hold onto it and had demonstrated in that old WWII airborne soldiers eyes to be competent and responsible and my family agreed. That began my gun ownership in life for real. I am now 29 in May and I have never ever even come close to an accident. Ignorance is dangerous and this culture we reside in today is horrid for critical thinking and taking responsibility. I have taken to the same mindset as I do riding a long board in one of the most dangerous places in the US to do so. I am doubly careful and mindful of others for this fact. But there is an entire other community from which it seems we share that is the opposite and I can relax and know I'm safe from idiots...I hate to say it like that but it's the truth and I'd like to spread that truth in order to rectify it through awareness of it.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I agree with you all, the moment some coward thinks, he can kill people, he also thinks they are unarmed, but if he knows a fair proportion are armed, and they know how to use the weapon. Surely that's a big deterrent. Like the Sydney siege would have been over before it had started if that were the case. Even if a Criminal has a weapon, and knows the rest are armed, as opposed to him having a weapon and the rest are unarmed . It has got to make a big difference. Same with the latest massacre in Kenya, if the teachers or other responsible adults were armed the death toll wouldn't have been as great, plus the fact a round into their explosive vests would have finished them.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: anonentity
as i mentioned....it has been further clarified that one cannot be discriminated against for things like disability, skin color, religion, etc. as well, the intention of "able bodied" arises from the term "militia" in the 2nd amendment. "Able bodied" is interpretive and a phrase given to us via Supreme Court ruling on the matter.
I am of the belief that your mental state is no ones business. And in that vein, also believe if we made it less of our business, we would have far fewer spree shooters. Especially as it pertains to the last 20 years, the overwhelming majority are people who were under treatment with SSI/SSRI medications. I would argue that the causative factor was not their mental state insomuch as their mental state under the influence of SSI/SSRI. Instead of rehabilitative treatment, it was a catalyst for violence that would be unthinkable had intervention never happened to begin with.
That is the problem with laws and legal precedent: unforeseen consequence. It is better to create a system that seeks to limit the 550 or so in a position of governmental power, than to go through the "cat herding" exercise of trying to control 300mil people. Thats just good ol' plain common sense.
originally posted by: bullcat
You know what really annoys me, that people fought and died to get you these rights, yet people just seem to be ignorant to them.
I am not American but I certainly see the purpose and benefit of a republic and the constitution (based on Magna Carta) . I also cringe when people call it a Democracy, it is NOT a democracy, it is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
My god man, people are so ignorant nowadays. To have these kind of questions asked by a foreigner pointing out the bloody obvious should be shameful really.
I'm going to say it..
SHAME ON THE PEOPLE WHO TRAMPLE OVER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE REPUBLIC.
Not my direct fight but when you stand up to the tyranny, it will save us all from the wars. Please, take back control of your country and your rights, it will make the world a safer place.
originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: bullcat
A lot of us know the government is dead wrong on a lot of the "laws" they pass. The problem is, unless you are a good lawyer by profession, know a good lawyer you can afford, or know one that will go pro bono for you, there is nothing we peons can do about it. Police are mostly morons that just follow orders, you will be lucky to make it to court alive if you decide to go the civil disobedience route and carry without the almighty government's blessing in places like NYC that are the worst constitution offenders.
originally posted by: bullcat
originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: bullcat
A lot of us know the government is dead wrong on a lot of the "laws" they pass. The problem is, unless you are a good lawyer by profession, know a good lawyer you can afford, or know one that will go pro bono for you, there is nothing we peons can do about it. Police are mostly morons that just follow orders, you will be lucky to make it to court alive if you decide to go the civil disobedience route and carry without the almighty government's blessing in places like NYC that are the worst constitution offenders.
Again, people fought and died for those rights, if you are not prepared to defend those rights, you may aswell give them up.
What also annoys me to the bone is when people come and dictate how we attack American rights and way of life and values, no really? The people that are really attacking your rights and way of life is YOURSELVES.
BACKBONE... you have the numbers.
You out number them.
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
The world (especially Europe) pays for your INACTION.
We are the ones suffering from your INACTION.
That is why we care about your constitution and system, even when YOU DO NOT.
Because we are the ones that pay for it.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: bullcat
originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: bullcat
A lot of us know the government is dead wrong on a lot of the "laws" they pass. The problem is, unless you are a good lawyer by profession, know a good lawyer you can afford, or know one that will go pro bono for you, there is nothing we peons can do about it. Police are mostly morons that just follow orders, you will be lucky to make it to court alive if you decide to go the civil disobedience route and carry without the almighty government's blessing in places like NYC that are the worst constitution offenders.
Again, people fought and died for those rights, if you are not prepared to defend those rights, you may aswell give them up.
What also annoys me to the bone is when people come and dictate how we attack American rights and way of life and values, no really? The people that are really attacking your rights and way of life is YOURSELVES.
BACKBONE... you have the numbers.
You out number them.
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
The world (especially Europe) pays for your INACTION.
We are the ones suffering from your INACTION.
That is why we care about your constitution and system, even when YOU DO NOT.
Because we are the ones that pay for it.
Nice...very strong argument. I like your enthusiasm.
originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: bullcat
Well first off, I live in canada for now. Second, I always choose to live in the country, and stay out of the city, live in places where there is no police force. I would rather live in the middle of nowhere and not have to deal with roid raging lunatics on power trips. Most people I know who actually think like I do, also live in the country.
I am not going to fight for city folks, to a whole lot of them, I am the backwards one. City people seem to be easier to herd, and unfortunately they outnumber us at least 50 to one in most states.
I think the biggest issue, is that the public education system is garbage, and only gets worse every year. They get the kids used to being micromanaged and completely controlled and "protected" by authority figures. By the time they are grown, they are completely subservient to authority, or they are likely in the penal system and screwed for life if not.