It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"NSA Shooting" - Doctored Image?

page: 2
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:00 PM
link   
a reply to: ScientificRailgun

and here's a closeup:


Each is on it's own panel as evidenced by the seam between the two right hand plaques.

NSA= Nonhomogeneous Shade of Azure

edit on 30-3-2015 by burdman30ott6 because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:01 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Nice closeup shot! Also well said. I think this can be case closed on this matter, after that.



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: VigiliaProcuratio
a reply to: ScientificRailgun

Poor journalism from BBC I gotta say, their picture does look messed up. That, what you posted there, is crystal-clear. Case closed, and thanks for the input because I started asking serious questions...
Just glad I could help. In a world where photo-doctoring is a common thing, it's a good thing to question anything that might be suspicious. Thanks for your vigilance!



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:05 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

I am suspicious of how quickly you got that close up photo.....



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Autorico
a reply to: burdman30ott6

I am suspicious of how quickly you got that close up photo.....
Oh no! burdman's cover is blown! I knew you were secretly NSA.



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: ScientificRailgun

Yeah, but I should've looked into the plaques before jumping to conclusions.

Still, I blame BBC... for everything. Including the fact that my wine glass is empty.



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Autorico
a reply to: burdman30ott6

I am suspicious of how quickly you got that close up photo.....


Google image search "NSA headquarters" It's about 30 images down after a bunch of other images taken around the vicinity, including the sign.

I was just amazed that Google was able to get the image up that quickly after I teleported from Alaska to Maryland, snapped the photo, and then dealt with slow 3G speeds to upload it to Fox's servers. Damn, Google is fast, REAL fast!



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScientificRailgun

originally posted by: Autorico
a reply to: burdman30ott6

I am suspicious of how quickly you got that close up photo.....
Oh no! burdman's cover is blown! I knew you were secretly NSA.


...we are the only part of the federal government that actually listens to what citizens have to say, after all...



edit on 30-3-2015 by burdman30ott6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

I dunno about NSA, but CleverBot listens to me... that much I know.
 
edit on 30th March 2015 by VigiliaProcuratio because:  



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 05:49 PM
link   
here we go again the BBC is faking or whatever.

1. The original image is a zoomed telephoto thus distorting the depth of field and relative object sizes. Anyone with an SLR and zoom lens knows this.
2. Do you really think the BBC spent anytime faking a picture like this....for what purpose? ...... Nonsense.
3. The focus and colour (correct BBC spelling !) are correct as others have pointed out.
4. Is the readers belief system the driver of conclusions and not facts ......
edit on 30/3/2015 by yorkshirelad because: P.S. We have a UK election hence question 2 (trivial foreign stuff even if from US DUH! )



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: yorkshirelad

I attest the following to be true...

  • The image is distorted, to suggest substandard equipment and/or skills.
  • My eyes deceived me and I failed to research the relevant information.
  • I had already been corrected in respect of my obvious perceptual error.
  • The BBC would manipulate journalistic material for want of political gain.



  • posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 06:45 PM
    link   
    a reply to: burdman30ott6

    "Need to know" Burd, need to know!!!



    posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 07:16 PM
    link   
    a reply to: Blaine91555

    I think it means that "They listen, for sure. Through your telly. And mobile phone. Even your pizza listens."



    posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 03:49 AM
    link   
    Don´t know the deal with the picture, it seems OK.

    But what about the event itself??
    Don´t you find it strange - why were they dressed up as women?
    Wrong turn? Don´t think so!
    Aren´t there signs telling you where you are going before you get to the security check?
    What were their purpose?



    posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 07:19 AM
    link   

    originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
    Here is the sign from a few different angles.





    This photo wasn't doctored. The C.S.S. plaque is genuinely a lighter shade of blue.


    Thanks for posting the sharper image.
    Odd the lightning bolt in the seal on the left for Cyber Command isn't crossed?
    Maybe they aren't as elegant as the Central Security Service?

    During the 80's the CIA caught a lot of flack over the Miami Cocaine trafficking so I'm glad they are doing a better job of keeping it out of Meade these days.



    new topics

    top topics



     
    1
    << 1   >>

    log in

    join