posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 03:35 PM
In light of the 100-0 Senate vote on the Iranian agreement-
The message is sent to the Administration that any Iranian agreement is in deep trouble.
All three of these guys seem to be squirming to different degrees and reasons. Besides squirming, they also have in common being nuclear
powers...That's the point of this thread. Not a who did what to whom, rather the potential instablity we face-haven't even mentioned NK-
and who is in the worse position, politically and internationally?
I believe the heat just got turned down a tad on Netanyahu with the Saudi announcement wanting nuclear power/weapons. Also, Putin's intimidation
factor just dropped a few notches with the announcement that their order for the PAK-FA fighter had dropped to 12 planes. That low a number has zero
military application as far as leverage goes and is a far cry from the chest pounding that the PAK-FA would be superior to the F-22.
All three have had set-backs.
I don't think I'd want any of their jobs.
How 'unstable' is this situation and who's the worse off??
edit on 30-3-2015 by nwtrucker because: (no reason given)