It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lets take a look at what all the Clintons may have been involved in

page: 1
47
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+22 more 
posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 01:08 PM
link   
I found this list with deaths by people that have moved in different circles around the Clintons. We all are hearing about how she wiped the server clean after being told to turn over emails,but looking at this,did your really expect her too? These deaths all seem a bit too convenient.

www.greatdreams.com...

I am sure there are other lists of this you can find on the internet,but I came across this one and decided to put it out there for ATS and see if you can come up with more info,or debunk some of this. I am working on something else at this time and can't give this the attention I feel it needs to have.



+19 more 
posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 01:20 PM
link   
Let us also not forget that Bill Clinton is directly tied
through court documents to
a sex slave pedophile island.
It is proven he was present at a mansion, on an island, where underage sex slaves were kept.
He also invited the procurer/handler/fixer of the child sex slaves to his daughter's wedding.


www.independent.co.uk... .html
nypost.com...
www.dailymail.co.uk... an-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html
www.thesmokinggun.com...
www.thepoliticalinsider.com...
patdollard.com...
www.washingtontimes.com...
abcnews.go.com...
www.dailymail.co.uk...
www.ukcolumn.org...
There are lots and lots more from sources many of you would scream about, but here are just a handful of what is out there from reputable sources.

And we are supposed to think the wife who stood by through all of this and knows now if she didn't then, and all the other infidelities that have been made public.
We are to think she should be praised and held up as a role model for women.
And should be the next President of the US

Get a grip people.


edit on 1Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:31:21 -0500pm33003pmk301 by grandmakdw because: lots of additions



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 01:37 PM
link   
And, to be 100% fair here, let's look at just one section of the soon-to-be infamous Bush Death List. Deny ignorance, my friends.
edit on 3032015 by Ironhawke because: (no reason given)

edit on 3032015 by Ironhawke because: punctuation



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 01:44 PM
link   
Judicial Watch Bill Clinton Archives
They needed a whole section to house Bill Clinton crimes documented thru FOIA requests.


+9 more 
posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 01:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ironhawke
And, to be 100% fair here, let's look at just one section of the soon-to-be infamous Bush Death List. Deny ignorance, my friends.


To be perfectly fair and balanced

We don't need a heredity Presidency

We don't need a dynastic Presidency

Neither a Bush nor a Clinton should run
or be elected
it will be the beginning of dynasties
in the US
and that is not how the US President should be chosen -
simply because they belong to a dynasty
and the dynasty thinks it is (whoever's)
turn to be President


And should we not forget, the Bush's and Clinton's are very very very close friends.

No to both!!!!



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Dimithae

Geez, I thought I knew a lot regarding both of the Clinton's alleged scandels, but this is almost eery to read. I tell you one thing I would definitely NOT be a Clinton body guard. One more geez, I mean it's unnatural too have that many people you're close to die in such a relatively short time frame, am I wrong?



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 01:57 PM
link   
If there was a "wake up" award, you should be the winner! We need no more of either of these "royals" they should all fade away.....like now.....



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 01:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Ironhawke To be honest....start your own damn thread...



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: grandmakdw

I agree with being fair as well. Problem I have is that one side point their finger at the other side in this sort of thing, however what I can't get is how is it people on either side of the political fight don't see both sides as being potentially culpable in extreme criminal behavior? Theres always this, well what about soandso doing such and such too! When the right response in my mind is wtf is going on? This crap cannot continue to fly.

Its like if Obama, or Clinton do something potentially worth looking into regarding its legality, everyone says Bush or Reagan did this and that. Same goes the other way, Bush or someone else does something screwy and his cronies say...but but look at what Clinton did with those young girls or whatever, BUT NOBODY says whats really wrong is that all those bastards are at minimum "skirting" the constitution and maybe, just maybe the tree of liberty is in need of some fresh water.

Gawd what am I saying...gotta be careful - I am very happy and love my family if I end up dead...damnit I didnt commit suicide!
edit on 30-3-2015 by BlueJacket because: spelling



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ironhawke
And, to be 100% fair here, let's look at just one section of the soon-to-be infamous Bush Death List. Deny ignorance, my friends.


While a totally fair response in defense of your team, the link is simply to the wiki page for 911. I was expecting some specific allegations.

Assuming for the moment that Bush has killed as many people as the Clinton's, I fail to see how that exonerates them.



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Ironhawke

How about they are both truly effed up and deserving of further inquiry, definitely NOT the presidency.



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: greencmp

Because now it seems that instead of proving they are not evil they just have to prove they aren't as evil as the next guy. This is sadly how "Great" our democracy is working.



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 02:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ironhawke
And, to be 100% fair here, let's look at just one section of the soon-to-be infamous Bush Death List. Deny ignorance, my friends.


Very weak.

Good work !!

How do we know Clinton(s) weren't involved in 9/11?




posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 02:27 PM
link   
Reading thru the info boggles the brain. It,s like an open secret that no one dares mention lest they die and no one cares cause they are too busy protecting their backside. You speak you die.



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 02:55 PM
link   
Hillary remindes me of Meryl Streep from The Manchurian Candidate.


Not just in looks but in attitude, the link in the OP hints to that. I honestly get some serious bad vibes from that woman, and the fact we could be talking about our next commander and chief worries me dearly. Jeb Bush isn't some saving grace either. But I will admit Jeb Bush and David Cameron would make cute pair. Hand in hand destroying whats left of western wealth and the economy.

Living under a rock is starting to sound nice right about now....



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: [post=19180066]JAY1980[/post
I couldnt agree more, thing is Hillary was kind of ...I dont know the lesser of 2 evils for me back in 08, but then she started wearing those Chinese military pant suits when she was Sec o State...it was like she drank the fizzy green vial in the mas scientist shop, is all Im saying.



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 03:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Ironhawke
And, to be 100% fair here, let's look at just one section of the soon-to-be infamous Bush Death List. Deny ignorance, my friends.


Very weak.

Good work !!

How do we know Clinton(s) weren't involved in 9/11?



How do we know they aren't time travelers who sank the Titanic and crashed the Hindenburg, while we're wildly giving free rein to our imaginations?

Perhaps Dr. Who is really chasing the Clintons through time?




posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 03:44 PM
link   
That's a list that machine gun Kelly would have been proud of.



posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 03:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66



Well Clinton admitted he failed to get Bin Laden when he had the chance.

Maybe that blunder had a purpose all of its own.




posted on Mar, 30 2015 @ 04:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: greencmp

Because now it seems that instead of proving they are not evil they just have to prove they aren't as evil as the next guy. This is sadly how "Great" our democracy is working.


The United States is not a democracy, it's a republic. There is a great deal of difference.

Cheers - Dave




top topics



 
47
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join