The criminal grapevine knows far more about police cuts than the average political commentator. They are mapping out the locations and numbers of
actual constables able to respond. The general population are the intended victims of the planned crimes.
Perhaps our dear Home Secretary can take off her kitten heels and don a pair of magnums, and go out on the beat, night duty, in one of London’s busy
boroughs without her entourage…perhaps then, once she has been spat at, abused, punched, kicked and made to feel like the lowest of the low, perhaps
then she will have some idea of what its like to be a much maligned Police Officer who is not only battling to keep crime down, but is battling an
incompetent and lazy CPS, a judicial system that is a complete joke, Senior Officers who have absolutely no idea what they are doing, targets which
change on a daily basis and don’t allow them to do their job properly, and see the goalposts moved weekly regarding crime figures, just to make this
Government look good when they say ‘crime is down’…when its not. When the next lot of riots occur, and Police numbers are at a point where
streets and whole tracts of cities are left to burn because there isn’t enough Officers to cope, and those Officers become victims of mobs, will
this Government realize they have made a mistake? No…….. they’ll blame the Police.
retiredandangry.wordpress.com... The questionnaire you'll find at this
link has the relevant points. If you aren't familiar with these points please research them. For example direct entry to senior ranks means spooks
take control. Stasi.
It is a simple fact, should we allow riots and large scale looting to occur, constables will be killed, and whole neighbourhoods burnt out.
The plan is to inflame public hatred against the police in general. Introduce a raft of spooks parachuted straight into senior police ranks.
Physically wear down the constables through crazy shift patterns etc. Then provocateur uncontrollable riots that spell the end of Britain.
Privatisation of key elements puts control in private hands.
An ATS member recently asked if there was evidence of police privatisation. Here are some links.
We have been manipulated into mistrusting all constables through a decades long campaign of mis-training and major anti-constabulary black ops such as
Hillsborough. Notice the insistence on blaming 'the police' for the actions of key individuals. (Jacko, this means you.) You are being misdirected by
the media.
For example. How did Plebgate turn out in your memory?
Please realise we have been fed a steady diet of anti-police stories in order that we could engineer our own destruction. Our complacency in the face
of the dismantling of our protective constabularies is in stark contrast to the voracious interest of the criminal underworld.
There is a solution.
Elect local constables independent of national government interference.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
Which criminals exactly?
My personal knowledge is of the town I live in. The local criminal community are far more clued up about police cuts, changes and privatisation than
the average political commentator. They are planning their intended future crime sprees accordingly.
One of my mates used to get kilos of hash cheap direct from the police incinerator. There are plenty of fingers in the pie. They don't want us all to
have a personal plantation 'cos that would stop the flow of easy money. My personal feeling about the reason cannabis is illegal is that we all feel
we've transgressed some rule and are therefore less likely to shout about stuff like Special Branch shutting down VIP child abuse investigations.
That brings up the whole question of Lawful and legal. Legal applies to statutes and is only applicable with consent. Lawful applies to all and is
mandatory. Commonly those whose entire identity depends 'believing' Lawful and legal are synonymous will do anything to force their point.
No. We're not all criminals. Usually. There are moments for all of us when we overreact.
Criminals of all social strata are closely watching the changes being made to policing. The private financiers have long been told by their analysts
that communication systems would improve until knowledge of the giant financial fraud is commonplace. At which point they need private police.
What do you think of the idea to elect local constables independent of national government control?