It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Guide to the FLAT EARTH

page: 6
29
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 05:26 PM
link   
We could always hire a pilot to fly us south. Don't you think people have done that though? We see from those vids that commercial air flights don't go straight south to go to Australia which would be the quickest way, making what should be a 12 hour flight become over 24 hours. I'm assuming a person who owns their own plane would go south though.

So its had to have been done. If those people encountered problems it would have been leaked out and talked about. Unless of course, TPTB got ahold of those people and shut them up....


a reply to: Another_Nut


edit on 31-3-2015 by PageLC14 because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: PageLC14

Is there any possibility what so ever, that the routes taken by airlines are merely those which keep them in maximum amount of contact with ground radar stations, for as much of the journey as possible?



posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 05:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: PageLC14

Is there any possibility what so ever, that the routes taken by airlines are merely those which keep them in maximum amount of contact with ground radar stations, for as much of the journey as possible?

Reasonable suggestion. I would imagine that it also relates to flying a route that is generally accessible to rescue efforts should the need arise. It's a lot easier to sent ships across the ocean than to send rescuers across the most hostile environment on surface of the planet.



posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 05:41 PM
link   
Yes, yes. A definite possibility.


a reply to: TrueBrit



posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 05:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Another_Nut

How does geometry sound?

How to Determine the Earth's Circumference

This was figured out around the 3rd century BC.



posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Lol u still don't get it

You could do that same calculation on the top of the super dome

or any arch

That in no way makes the super dome round

This was a dressed a page or two ago.

Which shows you have no interest in this

Thought exercise

so why even take part?
edit on pm320153105America/ChicagoTue, 31 Mar 2015 17:50:55 -0500_3000000 by Another_Nut because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 05:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Another_Nut

Well, you can hardly blame Krazysh0t for missing a post or two.

And let's face it, no one can explain why it is, that some stars are visible from the Southern Hemisphere, which are not visible from the northern, and vice versa, unless of course, the Earth happens to be spherical of course.



posted on Mar, 31 2015 @ 05:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Another_Nut
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Lol u still don't get it

You could do that same calculation on the top of the super dome

or any arch

That in no way makes the super dome round

This was a dressed a page or two ago.

Which shows you have no interest in this

Thought exercise

so why even take part?

Yes, but that would set the circumference at the measurement of the edge of the theoretical domed disc. Around the antarctic barrier. But evidence does not support that the maximum circumference lies anywhere north or south of the equator. So there's an inherent disconnect in the argument.



posted on Apr, 1 2015 @ 09:03 AM
link   
- Flat Earth Lock Haven University



posted on Apr, 1 2015 @ 09:08 AM
link   
Here is another good source for research on this topic. Wild Heteric - Concave Earth Theory



posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 10:11 AM
link   
Again OP I truly want to thank you for this wonderful journey. And it might even be better that you are a bot, that also might explain why your kin have come here to hammer you so mercifully. Hang in there


As I have read this thread no one has mentioned flat earth from the perspective of, the saturn moon matrix, or the concave earth glass sky, Google/youtube those terms.

As a Welder I found this* guys perspective/theory about earth being a grid iron very interesting. However I really had to dig through his page to extract the idea. * QuasiLuminous on youtube.

Again I don't know whats going on here, but I do know an open mind/heart is key.








posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 06:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: PageLC14
Like people have said here, we only have what others tell us. Which is heresy, isn't it?



No, that is Hearsay. Heresy is quite different.



posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 06:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Another_Nut

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Another_Nut

Where are the edges of the earth then? All of these experiments to prove the roundness of the planet can be reproduced anywhere on the planet. A half sphere would have to have an edge somewhere, yet no edges exist.


have u even read this thread?

the edges would be anartica

and it doesnt have to be half a sphere.

something like this



That doesn't make any sense. How could Antarctica be the only edge?



posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 07:20 PM
link   
a reply to: sputniksteve

It does from a concept point

Just like any map would show you

Take a map of the earth. Now does Antarctica st reach half way across the bottom?

No it is unferled so the edges appear to be at the bottom.

In reality u have to wrap the edges to make them touch to show the shape

Same works for a "flat earth"



posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 07:27 PM
link   
Oops pardon my autocorrect. I didn't even notice.


a reply to: sputniksteve



posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: TrueBrit

Well let me go out on a ledge here

Ever seen those crackerjack cards with the moving image?

You know the ones that have two images that change when you tilt them slightly?

Same concept could apply.

Now from the "northern hemisphere" your would see one picture of the sky

While from the "southern hemisphere" your would see the other

Keep in mind this is just a top of the head idea but it would work
edit on pm420153007America/ChicagoThu, 02 Apr 2015 19:43:38 -0500_4000000 by Another_Nut because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Another_Nut

My point was that you can't only have 1 edge, you have to have an edge to North, South, East, and West otherwise the "flat earth" is infinite. Where are the other 3 edges?



posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Another_Nut

That would suggest that not only is the earth flat, but that humanity is split up between two sides of it...

Or...

www.thenakedscientists.com...



posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 08:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Another_Nut
a reply to: TrueBrit

Well let me go out on a ledge here

Ever seen those crackerjack cards with the moving image?

You know the ones that have two images that change when you tilt them slightly?

Same concept could apply.

Now from the "northern hemisphere" your would see one picture of the sky

While from the "southern hemisphere" your would see the other

Keep in mind this is just a top of the head idea but it would work


That seems to be a pretty loose translation of the word "work".



posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 08:25 PM
link   
a reply to: sputniksteve

um yes u can . like the rim of a glass . a circle. thats like saying the from a top down perspective the superdome needs multiple edges

no its a circle. one edge is all u need. with antartica wrapped around the inside

a reply to: TrueBrit

no that was just simplified for the sake of showing the concept

they make those cards with multiple edges you know

it dosnt have to be two

a reply to: sputniksteve

but as a concept it does work

you could also make those edges with ,for examples sake, 5 ridge sections so every five ridges shows a picture. this would give u 5 pictures in both north and south depending on which side you were viewing it from

many ways to go about this
edit on pm420153008America/ChicagoThu, 02 Apr 2015 20:29:01 -0500_4u by Another_Nut because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
29
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join