It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Guide to the FLAT EARTH

page: 32
29
<< 29  30  31    33 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 07:44 AM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

no - as usual - you are dishonestly cherry picking - relative velocity does NOT contradict coriolis - they are seperate forces that can act simultaneously on an object

relative velocity is the CORRECT answer [ for the ORIGIONAL claim ] - and as for coriolis effect - lets HONESTLY continue to quote your source :


This force causes moving objects on the surface of the Earth to be deflected to the right (with respect to the direction of travel) in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere.


explain that using the flat earth delusion

further :


Because the Earth completes only one rotation per day, the Coriolis force is quite small, and its effects generally become noticeable only for motions occurring over large distances and long periods of time,


so - again to what altitide did the alledged mr skellam fire his alledged canon ball ?

all you have really shown so far is dishonesty and evasion




posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 07:46 AM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

PS - again what deflection should the coriolis effect generate on a canonball ?



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 07:51 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

You can't have it both ways. Your science is flawed, it is contradictory.



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

so thats a cannot // willnot anwser - sop much for discussion

my science is not flawed - its your delusions that are the problem

your own souces even contradict you

so - why wont you answer the question ?



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 08:01 AM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

so - again - explain :

This force causes moving objects on the surface of the Earth to be deflected to the right (with respect to the direction of travel) in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere


using flat earth delusions



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

If relative velocity keeps things in sync with Earth's rotation, there can be no Coriolis effect. The end.



edit on 17-1-2017 by MatterOfPerspective because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 08:17 AM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

stop making crap up - relative velocity and coriolis are 2 seperate forces that act independantly on objects - there is no contradiction

read your source - the magnitude of coriolis is a function of latitude

so how does that work on a flat earth - and further :

explain :

This force causes moving objects on the surface of the Earth to be deflected to the right (with respect to the direction of travel) in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere


using flat earth delusions

stooop running away sir robin - you will only die tired



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 08:30 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

I cannot answer a question about a paradoxal situation. You have to pick. You have two options.

1) Relative velocity keeps airborne objects in sync with the Earth's rotation, and as a result, the Coriolis effect can not exist.

2) There is no force keeping airborne objects in sync with the Earth's rotation, as suggested by the Coriolis effect.
edit on 17-1-2017 by MatterOfPerspective because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

your willfull ignorance is hysterical - again :

relative velocity and the coriolis effect are seperate forces that can act on a body - its that simple

i realise that your cognative dissonance makes you do it

but please answer the question :

in the flat earth " model " , why does the coriolis effect have a different vector north and south of the equator

EDIT : edited to avoid weasel evasion
edit on 18-1-2017 by ignorant_ape because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2017 @ 04:37 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Again, you can't have both.



posted on Jan, 18 2017 @ 06:05 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape


This force causes moving objects on the surface of the Earth to be deflected to the right (with respect to the direction of travel) in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere


This doesn't even make sense. Is Earth spinning in the opposite direction in the Southern Hemisphere?

It shouldn't matter on which hemisphere an object is located, what should matter is the direction an object travels. Earth is moving East, so for instance objects moving North on either hemisphere should deflect to the left, objects moving South on either hemisphere should deflect to the right.

In both cases the deflection should be West.



posted on Jan, 18 2017 @ 06:36 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape




Because the Earth completes only one rotation per day, the Coriolis force is quite small, and its effects generally become noticeable only for motions occurring over large distances and long periods of time,


This is just pure deception.

Oh I see, the Earth makes only one full rotation a day.........so it can't be moving very fast? Imagine that it would make two rotations a day........or three.

Let me rephrase that.




Because the Earth is rotating at up to a 1000 mph, the Coriolis force is quite small, and its effects generally become noticeable only for motions occurring over large distances and long periods of time,




posted on Jan, 18 2017 @ 11:14 AM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

which bit of : relative velocity and coriolis are 2 seperate forces that act independantly on objects - there is no contradiction

are you too dishonest to accept ?

further - we are using YOUR source for coriolis - as YOU brought it up

next - still waiting for evidence that the alledged skellam experiment ever occured - is noted that you will believe anything you find on the internet that stokes your confirmation bias

next - read the fooking source - and actually understand it - coriolis is a function of the shape of the globe - thats why its magnitude is determined by latitude

by this stage its hard to tell if you are babbling out of desperation dishonesty or just dumbness

but hey - watching you back away from a source you brought up is entertaining

and coriolois is observed - thats the funny bit - you keep wittering about " observation " - but hey - as soon as one contradicts you - you ignore it

so again - explain coriolis effect - usiing the flat earth delusion - the spheriod model hsas it covered - as its a function of the shape of the globe
edit on 18-1-2017 by ignorant_ape because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2017 @ 11:38 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

What I said in the 4 previous posts.

You are not touching it.

The end.
edit on 18-1-2017 by MatterOfPerspective because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2017 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

bye bye brave sir robin



posted on Jan, 18 2017 @ 12:04 PM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Still in denial about the fact that your science is a trainwreck of a contradictory mess.



posted on Jan, 18 2017 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

oh dear - i thought you ran away ??? - lying again ??????????

the only dishonest train wreck is your psuedo science trolling - i shall again quote from your own source :


This force causes moving objects on the surface of the Earth to be deflected to the right (with respect to the direction of travel) in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere.


and supply a picture - as you clearly didnt understand it - or just lied



blue line = equatopr - north = top of image

black lines = direction of object travel

red lines = coriolis deflection in niorthern hemisphere [ to right of direction traveled ]

purple lines lines = coriolis deflection in southern hemisphere [ to left of direction traveled ]

exactly as your source states - and congruent with all observations

now - lets see what bollox you wrote :


In both cases the deflection should be West.


that makes zero sense - and i pity the sanity of people who have to read that

but it does show your dishonesty or scientific illiteracy - i has given up attempting to distingush the two

but hey - skallam experiment citations - or ANY of the questions you have brave sir robbined ?



posted on Jan, 18 2017 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: MatterOfPerspective

the only thing you did in the previous 4 posts was wail scream no and contradictt a source you brought up



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 05:41 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape




exactly as your source states - and congruent with all observations


I obviously get what it is saying without the drawings. I asked you why there is a difference in deflection depending on the hemisphere?

Is one hemisphere rotating in the opposite direction?

Like I said it makes no sense.





that makes zero sense


Earth is spinning East in both hemispheres so airborne objects travelling North on either hemisphere should deflect to the opposite direction.(West)

edit on 19-1-2017 by MatterOfPerspective because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 05:57 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape




so again - explain coriolis effect - usiing the flat earth delusion - the spheriod model hsas it covered - as its a function of the shape of the globe


The Coriolis effect itself has nothing to do with the shape of the Earth. It is not a function of the shape of the globe. You are making this up.



The Coriolis effect is caused by the rotation of the Earth and the inertia of the mass experiencing the effect.




In physics, the Coriolis force is an inertial force (also called a fictitious force)[1] that acts on objects that are in motion relative to a rotating reference frame.


Sure, there is a rotation vector that also should be taken into account on a rotating sphere but this is not the Coriolis Effect. The effect would also take place with a flat moving surface as frame of reference.





which bit of : relative velocity and coriolis are 2 seperate forces that act independantly on objects - there is no contradiction


The Coriolis effect says that the Earth rotates away from airborne objects, which means they are not in sync with the rotation.

You say that airborne objects are kept in sync with the rotation of the Earth because of their relative velocity.

The two viewpoints are in complete contradiction, and this is very clear to see.





further - we are using YOUR source for coriolis - as YOU brought it up


It is actually your source, since this represents the official scientific viewpoint that you support.


edit on 19-1-2017 by MatterOfPerspective because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
29
<< 29  30  31    33 >>

log in

join