It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Guide to the FLAT EARTH

page: 21
29
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 11:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: choos
a reply to: NNN87

how does the sun have a localised light when we see it sink beneath the horizon?? it should be disappearing in the distant sky getting more and more dim, eventually just disappearing in the sky correct?

and according to a flat earth maps, airlines should fly over north america when flying from australia to argentina.. but it doesnt at all.. they choose to waste huge amounts of money to fly the long way around..


Gotta keep up the charade it seems, no matter the cost to the airlines......




posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 12:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: sputniksteve

originally posted by: choos
a reply to: NNN87

how does the sun have a localised light when we see it sink beneath the horizon?? it should be disappearing in the distant sky getting more and more dim, eventually just disappearing in the sky correct?

and according to a flat earth maps, airlines should fly over north america when flying from australia to argentina.. but it doesnt at all.. they choose to waste huge amounts of money to fly the long way around..


Gotta keep up the charade it seems, no matter the cost to the airlines......


That's a lot of land to cover, no plane would see i, or keep up with it, the light still travels the same speed.

Also there are GPS blind spots over huge amounts of area which planes are not aloud to fly over for safety purposes, there are a a lot of maps, some show air traffic on multiple ones, all make sense no matter the shape, the distances are to great and the speed is not sufficient to cover it or exceed the speed of the sun, the moon moves slower though but still, lets just assume its only a few thousand miles away, that is also to great of a distance for our perspective.



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 12:37 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

please cite these alledged " GPS blind spots "



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: NNN87

please cite these alledged " GPS blind spots "


Google airline traffic maps, and you will see for your self, hahaha do your research, make up your own mind, i have mentioned a simple experiment people can try and your asking me about things anyone can go and see for themselves.



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

no - i want you to cite them - where EXACTLY is the " gps blind spot " ?????????



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 01:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: NNN87

no - i want you to cite them - where EXACTLY is the " gps blind spot " ?????????


Are you a child? Internet has been around for a long time now, anyone with a thumb can use it, come to think of it my cat can operate it and find what its looking for, liver liver meow mix please deliver. Search up air line traffic maps, DONE, you will have your answer in a new york minute.



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 01:23 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

so - thats no no then - i want YOUR version of where these alledged " GPS blind spots "are

is that so hard to comprehend

i has now got a suspicion of what you mean - and if it is accurate - fooking hilarious

so - the alledged " GPS blind spot" is at ..........................



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87




in a new york minute



Yeeaargh! Oh my God! Oh God! You shot me, aaaahh! You're dead Payne!


couldn't resist



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 01:30 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

youtu.be...

So, where exactly are they again? Because in that video, which used real time flight tracking, it sure looked like planes were everywhere except the polar regions.



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: NNN87

youtu.be...

So, where exactly are they again? Because in that video, which used real time flight tracking, it sure looked like planes were everywhere except the polar regions.


Bellow the equator mostly, anything north on an equidistant map is actually a distance short enough for land towers to reach one another, further south you go the wider it gets, using the equidistant projection mind you, that's as far as i can observe or able to, but why are you all ignoring the simple experiment i mentioned? You all asked for one and now it's side tracking time?



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 02:34 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

and using your flat earth map - there is no commercial airliner that can fly non stop from johannasburg [ RSA ] to perth [ AUS ] with cargo and passengers - but hey - thers a daily scheduled service - it takes 9h 20 min

and oops again - no commercial airliner can fly the alledged flat earth distance in the flight time

flat earth fails again



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

but we still have not got a straight answer on where these alledged " GPS blind spots " are

evasive little critter aint you



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: NNN87

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: NNN87

youtu.be...

So, where exactly are they again? Because in that video, which used real time flight tracking, it sure looked like planes were everywhere except the polar regions.


Bellow the equator mostly, anything north on an equidistant map is actually a distance short enough for land towers to reach one another, further south you go the wider it gets, using the equidistant projection mind you, that's as far as i can observe or able to, but why are you all ignoring the simple experiment i mentioned? You all asked for one and now it's side tracking time?


Is the atmosphere flat too? I asked this a while back, and everyone sidetracks my serious questions.



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 02:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: NNN87

and using your flat earth map - there is no commercial airliner that can fly non stop from johannasburg [ RSA ] to perth [ AUS ] with cargo and passengers - but hey - thers a daily scheduled service - it takes 9h 20 min

and oops again - no commercial airliner can fly the alledged flat earth distance in the flight time

flat earth fails again


There are to many elements to consider, delayed, turbulence, if the plane is keeping constant speed, weather and what have yeah so that's honestly a tough one, but i think the sites name is like flightradar or something, and i have yet to see a plane cross oceans below the equator, and some seem to do so but they disappear from the radar its odd, doesn't seem safe at all.

And and that's true, why wouldn't a plane be able to fly that distance, the equidistant projection, not flat earth map, it's not called that, doesn't change the proportions of continents, or ocean distances above the equator, and that's where 99% of air traffic is,
so it doesn't really matter at all anyways, what about seeing the supposed curvature? Are younot going to try the simple experiment?



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: imjack

You know, that would be pretty cool, also endless, i don't know why people think there would be an edge.

On a fantasy sci-fi conspiracy perspective what if the stars above are lights on a distant and surface, i don't know i have no resources to go that high my self.



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

sigh - i have done the curvature experiment - and my results were congruent with the spheroid model

i used an idea location - its called the straits of dover - you may have heard of them
[ they are famous ]

but i digress

bottom line is - standing on the dover harbour battery [ 4m above sea level ] - hives a very different view of calais than the carpark at st margrets battery - despite the fact that st margrets is further from calais [ by about 1 km ]

so - you were saying ???

as for flight radar - the clue is in the name
there is a reason that the app looses track of aircraft a long way from land



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: NNN87

sigh - i have done the curvature experiment - and my results were congruent with the spheroid model

i used an idea location - its called the straits of dover - you may have heard of them
[ they are famous ]

but i digress

bottom line is - standing on the dover harbour battery [ 4m above sea level ] - hives a very different view of calais than the carpark at st margrets battery - despite the fact that st margrets is further from calais [ by about 1 km ]

so - you were saying ???

as for flight radar - the clue is in the name
there is a reason that the app looses track of aircraft a long way from land


But they claim its GPS based, as in satellites, why are there blind spots, and why in heavens sake would they let a plane full of people disappear over large area of open water?



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 03:15 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

art last - you have come out with your " argument "

now listen carefully - there are no " GPS blind spots " in the southern hemisphere

jere is AIS tracker - it stands for automatic identification system

its mandatory on all comercial vessels over 50m

sourse

hey look - vessels trackable al the way across the southern oceans

all by the power of GPS

now where are these " blind spots " you babble about ???????????????
edit on 20-12-2016 by ignorant_ape because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 03:19 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

Did you bother to watch the video? There were flights all over below the equator. The only real gap areas were in Africa, where air travel isn't as common as other areas.



posted on Dec, 20 2016 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: NNN87

It's not radar. They track aircraft by their transponder. The only easy to do that for a flight tracking site is to have ground based receivers that take data from the aircraft and translate it to their tracking page. As it's an ocean, putting a ground based receiver is difficult at best. There is a site that has floated a receiver out into the ocean as an experiment, but until they have receivers where they can pick up signals their data over the ocean is an estimated location.



new topics

top topics



 
29
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join