It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Man Wins Court Case for 9/11 Coverup

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 09:49 PM
link   
A man named Tony Rooke presented BBC video footage to a judge at a court in the UK, trying to prove that the media empire had to have prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks since they reported the demolition of the WTC 7 twenty minutes before it actually happened.

And the judge agreed.

Apparently, Rooke was in some sort of disagreement with the BBC over a licensing fee.



So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.


Here's the video: (The video doesn't seem to be working at any site anymore for some reason...)




Here's a more thorough article in the Daily Mail:
www.dailymail.co.uk...


topinfopost.com...
Source:

edit on 27-3-2015 by MRuss because: (no reason given)

edit on 27-3-2015 by MRuss because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 09:58 PM
link   
This code: bHQPaAkIl0I




edit on 27-3-2015 by jude11 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 09:59 PM
link   
a reply to: MRuss

He was found guilty and the judge wouldn't let him use his ''evidence'' because it was ''irrelevant'' to the case.



Rooke, who admitted owning a TV and watching it without a licence, was found guilty of using an unlicensed set, given a six-month conditional discharge and told to pay £200 costs.


www.dailymail.co.uk...

Personally I've always just felt that the BBC 9/11 footage on WTC7 wasn't an indication of the BBC being in on the conspiracy, it was just the BBC being retarded, not for the first time



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 09:59 PM
link   
a reply to: jude11

Thank you!



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 10:00 PM
link   
So does this mean that UKers can do this every time the news reports something wrong now?

I'm not biting on the 9/11 aspect, as I have a mound of reading still to do.

But I think it's a valid question, since the 24/7 media cycle now reports rumor as fact



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: MRuss
a reply to: jude11

Thank you!


NP

Peace



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 10:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
a reply to: MRuss

He was found guilty and the judge wouldn't let him use his ''evidence'' because it was ''irrelevant'' to the case.



Rooke, who admitted owning a TV and watching it without a licence, was found guilty of using an unlicensed set, given a six-month conditional discharge and told to pay £200 costs.


www.dailymail.co.uk...

Personally I've always just felt that the BBC 9/11 footage on WTC7 wasn't an indication of the BBC being in on the conspiracy, it was just the BBC being retarded, not for the first time


Plus, there's that.



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 10:14 PM
link   
The claim is a hoax, Rooke actually lost the court case, it has been covered here before, and it is where it belongs, in the hoax bin.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

It happened 18 months ago also....

It is amazing what truthers think is a win in court!
edit on 27-3-2015 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 10:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
a reply to: MRuss

He was found guilty and the judge wouldn't let him use his ''evidence'' because it was ''irrelevant'' to the case.



Rooke, who admitted owning a TV and watching it without a licence, was found guilty of using an unlicensed set, given a six-month conditional discharge and told to pay £200 costs.


www.dailymail.co.uk...

Personally I've always just felt that the BBC 9/11 footage on WTC7 wasn't an indication of the BBC being in on the conspiracy, it was just the BBC being retarded, not for the first time


Plus, there's that.



I think it's an indication that the News is spoon fed from centralized controlled unknown powers that be. She was simply regurgitating what was read off the teleprompter.

Building 7 countdown
edit on 27-3-2015 by Doctor Smith because: No luck finding the You Tube ID



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 10:57 PM
link   

edit on 27-3-2015 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 11:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

Building 7 countdown


He constantly changes his story, and claims there was a countdown on a red cross radio....

screwloosechange.blogspot.com.au...



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 11:37 PM
link   
Hoax Already Posted

Closing

Semper



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join