It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: daftpink
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Lets not forget this sort of thing has gone on before...
www.theguardian.com...
But there's no corruption here, no.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Guess what? I have issues with this throughout government. What I find repulsive about this is that many here do not, at their ignorance, and at their bashing one person and not taking issue with the systemic disease.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Sigh.
I could and have cited twice as many showing that there is doubt. Or that she didn't.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Point being, they don't know. And we sure as hell don't know if they can't agree. No one has been charged. Arrested. Indicted. And so we wait.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
But we do not rush to judgement. We do not make grand declarations.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Is this a foreign concept to you?
originally posted by: jimmyx
POST REMOVED BY STAFF
originally posted by: DYepes
Can a Judge order the Director of the NSA to release the saved records of those emails?? If it has been established they built that database to save all and every digital interaction across the internet, should not those emails still be saved in that database?? Insiders are already using it to blackmail each other, why not use it to apply rule of law?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: jimmyx
now, now eager little right-wingers....your trusted republicans in congress will keep this going until the election, no matter how petty its gets...just remember your fight mantra...BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI !!!!!!!.....sit back and relax with that playing in your heads
You do understand this incident occurred during Obama's first term in office right?
You do know Obama and his administration did all they could to keep information about Benghazi from the public since it occurred 2 months prior to the 2012 presidential elections.
For this administration the left hand doesn't know what the far left hand is doing.
originally posted by: jimmyx
a reply to: SheopleNation
sheeple nation??....if she carried out illegal actions, she would be in front of a judge in an courtroom in no time flat.....unlike right-wing political spin, you have to have proof of what you say.....I looked at the "records act", of the 50's that has all these republicans slobbering over themselves wanting the head of Hillary, and lo and behold....it has exceptions to the rule, that every republican cabinet member also used during their tenure.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Sigh.
I could and have cited twice as many showing that there is doubt. Or that she didn't.
Either way it would have undermined your argument that no one is talking about this. Clearly it is being discussed, including legal ramifications.
I
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Point being, they don't know. And we sure as hell don't know if they can't agree. No one has been charged. Arrested. Indicted. And so we wait.
You are not familiar with how investigations work, especially when its dealing with Congress, are you?
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
But we do not rush to judgement. We do not make grand declarations.
Actually yes you have.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Is this a foreign concept to you?
Would the right honorable woman from the great state of denial yield the floor and do some research before attacking people?
originally posted by: SheopleNation
Yeah you keep focusing on root causes while deflecting away from the topic of discussion, which happens to be the infamous corrupt politician Hillary Clinton.
I mean you act like most of us do not see the bigger picture, but the fact that there is corruption abroad does not excuse her illegal actions. So the focus will remain on Hillary Clinton, while the symptoms of decay overall will be noted thank you. ~$heopleNation
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
No one. NO ONE is agreeing or even saying that laws were actually broken. No media. No attorneys. No one.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: ~Lucidity
You said it on page 14 of this thread. Let me quote you -
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
No one. NO ONE is agreeing or even saying that laws were actually broken. No media. No attorneys. No one.
as for the rest of your post I wont come down to your level and help you derail this thread.
No one. NO ONE is agreeing or even saying that laws were actually broken. No media. No attorneys. No one.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Xcathdra
All I get from you is legal propaganda with no arrest or warrants. We should re visit this thread later in the week perhaps Gowdy will have presented evidence to the DOJ by then.