It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Willtell
You criticize the Arabs who want to go nuclear while the US is the only country that actually used a bomb on live human beings….so whose is the real crazy one?
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: crazyewok
I don't trust the US government.
I know you don't trust the UK government.
Why in the hell would I or you even consider trusting any other government?
I know your views (as they have related to religion on ATS) on theocracies. Yet you are willing to trust a religious] theocratic government?
I guess there's a dichotomy going on here that I'm having a hard time getting my head around.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: Swills
Of course, this is Bush's fault. NK wasn't first, China was before NK...1964 back to Johnson watch....
Man the spin is spitting out FAST....
It is when bush invaded the wrong effing country!
Instead of marching into North Korea when the first test happend
You marched into Iraq!
Did Bush just read a map wrong and send the army to the wrong place?
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: crazyewok
War is never nice nor something to be taken lightly.
But I don't generally wait until the knife is in my gut before I do something towards a person trying to stab me.
I appreciate your candor.
Basically, we don't know anything. We can only surmise based on the evidence we have.
Let's all hope (and pray) that it's not the worst possible scenario.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: IAMTAT
I'm still waiting for evidence Iran even has nukes
And no the word of Netchenyaho and neocons who brought us Iraq don't count.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: enlightenedservant
a reply to: crazyewok
So Iran, in your opinion, doesn't have a nuclear program, will never have a nuclear program, but even if they did, they would never get away with it because they have to test all their weapons first and that even a faulty nuclear weapon would not cause any damage, and that they would never give terrorist groups nuclear weapons because that would be stupid and terrorist groups and politicians aren't stupid.
Do I have this right?
originally posted by: proteus33
wow around 10 saudi operatives destroyed world trade center and severely damaged the pentagon and caused the loss of 4 airliners imagine what the fanatical true rulers of kingdom of saud would do with say five nukes. and how fast would our us gov come out and say that saudi arabia was not involved in the nuke tragedy.
originally posted by: McGinty
Maybe Obama et al hopes they'll all nuke each other and the US will be the only country technically advanced and resourced to then harvest that subterranean oil that'll be engulfed in radioactive fallout.
Hope not, as it's not the best of plans.
I'd research the history of the region, they've not only invented many things used in warfare but have contributed greatly to Western society/science/mathematics/agriculture/architecture/astronomy etc etc etc.
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
a reply to: SLAYER69
I'd research the history of the region, they've not only invented many things used in warfare but have contributed greatly to Western society/science/mathematics/agriculture/architecture/astronomy etc etc etc.
The above is probably a true statement, despite that I wouldn't change my view the Middle east should never get their hands on nuclear weapons because they will use them, the history shows they are tribes still at war and will use what ever weapon they can get their hands on.