It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
okay
in my experience sincerely devout religious people (be they Christian, Muslim, whatever) are certainly not less moral in their behavior than non-believers.
Especially from certain denominations and/or congregations.
Of course, there are a lot of phonies as well, just like with the politicians.
But there are also a lot of people who don't go to church that you can't trust, either.
Also, I think a lot of people who disparage religions are missing a major point.
There are a lot of people who do good deeds strictly because of their beliefs.
originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
Your connection is that people in the south go to church at a higher rate then the rest of the country and that the social problems are linked to church attendance.
So in order to feed your own personal rhetoric you make a connection that people who go to church are more prone to violence? In order to prove this claim you have to have records of people who go to church and a true connection to the crimes that you claim. Since church attendance is not public records everything you claim is pure speculation since, any person can claim 100% Sunday morning church attendance. In order to prove this connection we have to look at all of the possible trends happening in this area gangs, poverty, schools, economics, jobs, or in your case church attendance.
In order to make these points you have to prove that you're not holding any personal bias towards people of faith.
Are these criminals waking up at 8am from all that drug induced coma paying attention during church? I mean all this violence contradicts many of the main themes of that particular faith. Maybe the preachers are gang members during the weekdays?
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
Given that some devoutly religious people are certainly not less moral, which denominations are you talking about?
But that said, if there was some extreme emergency that required you to ask a total stranger to watch your infant child, who are you going to pick: an old order Mennonite or someone wearing a Jack Daniels T-shirt?
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
Mennonite senior - well - *heavy sigh*.......
Snap judgment?
No. Sorry. But then we get back to initial impressions beyond "outer garments". What are they driving? Do they have all their teeth? Do they smell bad? What are they eating? Are they competent to rise above themselves to care for a baby?
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
In the end, if I had to choose between those two "adults" and a preteen child with a basic public education who lived in a non-ghetto neighborhood......, I'd choose the preteen.
originally posted by: TownCryer
Republicans and thier Small Government beliefs, eh?