It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Canada and the USA -and Mexico- for that matter are bound at the hip with NAFTA - and I suspect our corporate rulers would like to "simplify" all our elections. And thus, their rule.
I suspect that's the whole point of the exercise - to prove birthplace doesn't matter, and to entrench the meme. Thus will the way be paved for a true union of nations, to be followed by what? the United States of Pepsi? ....a few more steps are required of course, but that's the endgame.
Makes me wonder how long it will be before we have the United States of Pepsi or whatever - and it won't matter where the president was born.
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) was a region-level dialogue with the stated purpose of providing greater cooperation on security and economic issues.[1] The Partnership was founded in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005, by Prime Minister of Canada Paul Martin, President of Mexico Vicente Fox, and U.S. President George W. Bush.[1] It was the second of such regional-level agreements involving the United States following the 1997 Partnership for Prosperity and Security in the Caribbean (PPS).
Since August 2009 it is no longer an active initiative of any of the original dialogue partners.
....On February 4, 2011, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama announced a new security and prosperity initiative with plans to "pursue a perimeter approach to security in ways that support economic competitiveness, job creation, and prosperity".[22]
On March 13, 2011, the Canadian government announced it was beginning a five-week consultation process "with all levels of government and with communities, non-governmental organizations and the private sector, as well as with our citizens on the implementation of the shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness".[23]
THE HARPER GOVERNMENT AND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION RELEASE THE CANADA-UNITED STATES REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL JOINT FORWARD PLAN
CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES COMMIT TO DEEPENING THE LEVEL OF REGULATORY COOPERATION
Ottawa, Ontario
29 August 2014
Introduction
Today, the Canada-United States Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Forward Plan was released. The plan sets the stage for fundamental changes in the way regulatory departments and agencies in both countries work together, making it easier for businesses to operate in both countries.
The Joint Forward Plan, which builds on the RCC Joint Action Plan launched in December 2011 by Prime Minister Harper and President Obama, will deepen Canada-U.S. regulatory cooperation through new bi-national processes and partnerships. This approach will institutionalize joint planning and collaboration between Canadian and U.S. regulatory agencies.
29 August 2014
Introduction
Today, the Canada-United States Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Forward Plan was released. The plan sets the stage for fundamental changes in the way regulatory departments and agencies in both countries work together, making it easier for businesses to operate in both countries.
The Joint Forward Plan, which builds on the RCC Joint Action Plan launched in December 2011 by Prime Minister Harper and President Obama, will deepen Canada-U.S. regulatory cooperation through new bi-national processes and partnerships. This approach will institutionalize joint planning and collaboration between Canadian and U.S. regulatory agencies.
The Joint Forward Plan also includes specific commitments to align 24 areas of regulatory business. Work will continue in areas such as marine safety and security, pharmaceuticals, food safety, plant and animal health, and crop protection products. The RCC Forward Plan also expands work into new areas such as energy efficiency, toy safety, medical devices, chemicals management, and the use of natural gas in transportation.
Apparently Ted Cruz wants to hide both his Canadian birth AND his Cuban heritage. After all, would "Rafael Cruz" (his REAL name) even be a consideration for President by the far righties?
...IF this was to stop a corporate agenda unification, we'd see which corporations were involved, the CEO's names, so on.
originally posted by: sirlancelot
Its funny people call him all these name but if you look at what hus agenda is my question is why?
What dont you like about our govt following the constitution?
Pre-supposes that his view of the constitution is accurate. For example he believes in religion being part of government and outright ignores the establishment clause
What dont you like about getting rid of IRS?
Elimnating revenues altogether? So how does he plan on funding defense or other necessities? ...More to the point, he knows this and says these things dishonestly with the aim of appealing to "useful" ideologues he sees as incapable of thought ...which should offend anyone he is speaking to
What dont you like about getting rid of Obamacare and getting a better solution?
He has no solution...hell he doesn't even have a solution for himself...thus he said he would go on Obamacare
What dont you like about a President that actually does what he says he will do and that doesnt lie!
Which candidate for President in the history of the United States has claimed otherwise?
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: babybunnies
Apparently Ted Cruz wants to hide both his Canadian birth AND his Cuban heritage. After all, would "Rafael Cruz" (his REAL name) even be a consideration for President by the far righties?
I don't see why his name makes a difference. It's his policies that matter.
originally posted by: Indigo5
I'll play...Responses in bold
originally posted by: sirlancelot
Its funny people call him all these name but if you look at what hus agenda is my question is why?
What dont you like about our govt following the constitution?
Pre-supposes that his view of the constitution is accurate. For example he believes in religion being part of government and outright ignores the establishment clause
What dont you like about getting rid of IRS?
Elimnating revenues altogether? So how does he plan on funding defense or other necessities? ...More to the point, he knows this and says these things dishonestly with the aim of appealing to "useful" ideologues he sees as incapable of thought ...which should offend anyone he is speaking to
What dont you like about getting rid of Obamacare and getting a better solution?
He has no solution...hell he doesn't even have a solution for himself...thus he said he would go on Obamacare
What dont you like about a President that actually does what he says he will do and that doesnt lie!
Which candidate for President in the history of the United States has claimed otherwise?
originally posted by: sirlancelot
originally posted by: Indigo5
I'll play...Responses in bold
originally posted by: sirlancelot
Its funny people call him all these name but if you look at what hus agenda is my question is why?
What dont you like about our govt following the constitution?
Pre-supposes that his view of the constitution is accurate. For example he believes in religion being part of government and outright ignores the establishment clause
What dont you like about getting rid of IRS?
Elimnating revenues altogether? So how does he plan on funding defense or other necessities? ...More to the point, he knows this and says these things dishonestly with the aim of appealing to "useful" ideologues he sees as incapable of thought ...which should offend anyone he is speaking to
What dont you like about getting rid of Obamacare and getting a better solution?
He has no solution...hell he doesn't even have a solution for himself...thus he said he would go on Obamacare
What dont you like about a President that actually does what he says he will do and that doesnt lie!
Which candidate for President in the history of the United States has claimed otherwise?
Not sure how to respond like you did but here it goes.
Point 1 Cruz never said his christian values where mandated by the constitution.
Rated 100% by the AU, indicating opposition to separation of church & state.
Cruz scores 100% Americans United for the Separation of Church and State
Scoring system for 2014: Ranges from 0% (supports separation of church & state) to 100% (opposed to separation of church & state).
originally posted by: [post=19181711]sirlancelot
Point 2 Cruz isnt suggesting getting rid of revenue but simplifying the revenue based on a flat tax.
originally posted by: [post=19181711]sirlancelot
Point 3 As a member of the senate obamacare is the only healthcare option and its the law.
originally posted by: [post=19181711]sirlancelot
Point 4 Your right all politicians lie its just a matter of the degree. All I know is Cruz was elected based on certain positions and he has attempted to honor his positions.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: babybunnies
Apparently Ted Cruz wants to hide both his Canadian birth AND his Cuban heritage. After all, would "Rafael Cruz" (his REAL name) even be a consideration for President by the far righties?
I don't see why his name makes a difference. It's his policies that matter.
originally posted by: sirlancelot
What dont you like about our govt following the constitution?
WHat dont you like about getting rid of IRS?
What dont you like about getting rid of Obamacare and getting a better solution?
What dont you like about a President that actually does what he says he will do and that doesnt lie!
originally posted by: sirlancelot
Point 1 Cruz never said his christian values where mandated by the constitution.
Point 2 Cruz isnt suggesting getting rid of revenue but simplifying the revenue based on a flat tax.
Point 3 As a member of the senate obamacare is the only healthcare option and its the law. Unlike many dems he isnt taking the waiver to subsidy his coverage. WHen and/or if he or others are able to amend or replace obamacare then lets see what happens.
Point 4 Your right all politicians lie its just a matter of the degree. All I know is Cruz was elected based on certain positions and he has attempted to honor his positions.