It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Yet Another Golden Gate Reference/Flight320

page: 1
11

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 11:40 AM
link   
As you may already know, Hollywood has been flooded within a 5 year span of scenes depicting both blatantly and subliminaly, the impending destruction of the Golden Gate Bridge. A few threads can be found on ATS. You can search yourself just using google images.

So it didnt suprise me when i woke up and checked CNN this morning, only to find out 1. Germanwings Flight 320 was intentionally crashed but 2. They posted a grainy picture of the suicide pilot at the Golden Gate Bridge:


Some of you may think this is nothing. But every twist and turn is planned by the people who run this world. Images are planted at crucial moments, whether in movies, tv shows to FOX and CNN. No one can be trusted. Question everything. This is no coincidence for the people who have been logging everytime the GG bridge is shown. It very well could be the next World Trade Center.


Jumbo stunt near golden gate bridge reminds onlookers of 9/11


An air show stunt in which a jumbo jet flew close to the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco sparked anger among some spectators who said it was reminiscent of 9/11.






posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 12:01 PM
link   
a reply to: southtower

Not totally sure, but think a 747 would probably "bounce" off the GGB. Jet fuel still doesn't burn hot enough to disintegrate steel structures.




Diameter of one main cable including the exterior wrapping is 36 3/8 in (0.92 m)


source



posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 12:02 PM
link   
Apparently his facebook picture was updated with this photo the day his name was released.

Can not find his Facebook page to verifiy this, if someone can access this and verify it.



posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: InverseLookingGlass

Agreed, or it would slice the plane up. Just like a commercial jet crashing into the World Trade Center should have produced film of the planes causing significant outerstructure damage, but with most of the plane failing to peirce the building and falling back down onto the streets. Yet all we see is a plane slice through like butter. Common sense would be that the video is fake.


To back this up, ex CIA pilot and son of Learjet said the same thing:




"No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he claimed in the affidavit.‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun 'telescoping' when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.

‘The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.

‘The engines when impacting the steel columns would havemaintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building. ‘No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity.

The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.

The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed at over 500 mph.  It would have crumpled.

No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.

‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.'




Ex Cia pilot gives sworn testimony that no planes hit the WTC

Basically, they can do whatever they want to the Golden Gate Bridge and either plant bombs or fake video to get their hoax across. Either way, if there was a future target that the Powers that Be are planting into our subconscious....it's this bridge.

edit on 26-3-2015 by southtower because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 03:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: amraks
Apparently his facebook picture was updated with this photo the day his name was released.

Can not find his Facebook page to verifiy this, if someone can access this and verify it.


Heres a screenshot from FB..complete BS page imo. Just opened up.




posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 03:39 PM
link   
a reply to: southtower

A large object hitting another object is going to do a lot of damage. About the only thing that will stop an aircraft at high speed is an extremely thick mass of cement.

If a small Cessna can do this then a 757 or 767 at high speed will do a lot worse.



posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: southtower
Interesting link you got there. I had never considered the no planes theory.



posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 04:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Tucket

John Lear has an amazing aviation record. But based on interactions on ATS, and reading his posts here, I wouldn't trust him to tell me the sky is blue.



posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 09:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Mandroid7

Yeah thats all I could find too. So I am guessing a friend meant this page which he probably seen on a mobile device and not realised it wasn't a proper facebook profile.



posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 09:39 PM
link   
a reply to: southtower

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare has a level which depicts the GG bridge being destroyed by drones.

Thought i'd throw that in there.



posted on Mar, 26 2015 @ 09:54 PM
link   
all things being equal...av fuel and office furniture STILL dont reach a temp. capable
of bringing a high rise skyscraper down in its footprint..will never happen.



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 06:18 PM
link   
So what is the possible conspiracy? That there's gonna be an attack on the bridge? This other thread related the San Andreas movie coming up and the Pilot's name Andreas, could it be a controlled earthquake to rip California Apart? HAARP?

Full ATS mode here, lol
The one strange thing though, is how that pic was the most pushed by the media, I'm sure there would have been more appropriate photos, hmmm
edit on 27/3/15 by athousandlives because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 06:45 PM
link   
a reply to: southtower

Wow..

What a load of deranged nonsense.

The Golden Gate bridge is a f-ing LANDMARK, it's a TOURIST spot.
Why is anyone surprised that it features so prominently? Something about Paris will show the Eiffel Tower, in London Big Ben or Tower Bridge, in Italy the Coliseum...

And why does anyone think that "they" (whoever the f "they" are supposed to be) would even need to give you any "subtle hints" about anything? And why those specific people?

This is all so bizarre I hardly know what else to say about it, other than the people who believe this nonsense should perhaps seek some kind of therapy.



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: athousandlives

Considering the load of crap we're being fed about this investigation, it doesn't surprise me.



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 06:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: autopat51
all things being equal...av fuel and office furniture STILL dont reach a temp. capable
of bringing a high rise skyscraper down in its footprint..will never happen.


Well you're clearly wrong, because that's exactly what did happen.

It didn't need to melt steel, it only needed to weaken one floor, held up by tabs on the outer structure. Once one floor failed all the weight from above was no longer supported and the floor beneath was no longer able to withstand the wight.

You see, this is what the many amateur "physicists" conveniently ignore when preaching about their conspiracy. The building collapsed due to the weakening of the structure not being able to hold up the wight of the floors above. If these planes had hit the top floor these buildings probably would not have collapsed.

Each floor was capable of holding a certain weight, and each floor maintained that strength through it's connections to the outer and core structure. Once one floor failed the collective thousands upon thousands of tons above were then resting on one floor, and so on, and so on, resulting in the pancake effect.

This is all ENTIRELY explained by basic physics, and anyone telling you otherwise is either an ignorant fool or a liar.



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 07:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Mandroid7

Clearly not his personal page.

Hence why it has "community" on it



posted on Mar, 27 2015 @ 07:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: southtower
the impending destruction of the Golden Gate Bridge.


If a plane did hit it the conspiracy theorists would be claiming that "someone" must have switched off the anti aircraft missiles and guns that must guard it, or it was painted with nanoo thermite, or during maintenance they must have secretly wired it up for demolition....

The bridge has been destroyed in movies at least back to 1955.... www.imdb.com...



new topics

top topics



 
11

log in

join