It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
He admitted it....no need for a court in my eyes.
While you're at it why don't you use your US Constitution, guaranteeing a fair trial, to wipe your bum with? It seems that is about as much respect as you have for it.
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
He admitted it....no need for a court in my eyes.
While you're at it why don't you use your US Constitution, guaranteeing a fair trial, to wipe your bum with? It seems that is about as much respect as you have for it.
originally posted by: Excallibacca
a reply to: abe froman
No question in my mind, but in the eyes of the law, there still needs to be a trial.
originally posted by: Excallibacca
I, for one, don't think a desertion charge is enough. I say he gets tried for treason. Good men died and bad men were set free on account of Bergdahl.
originally posted by: Ironhawke
a reply to: macman
Still deserves an actual trial before we all start screeching for blood, you know. Until he has been declared guilty by a court or tribunal, I'm still giving him the benefit of the doubt.