It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: guitarplayer
I would much rather point out how some the candidates through their political and personal history have demonstrated that it does not mean anything to them. Some I would say have through their actions that they are above law and the laws do not apply the them.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Which has been done ad nauseum by many many Scientist and Studies......all one needs to do is a damn google search...
Yet those studies are swept under the rug, thrown out as heresy against the popular belief system, and its authors are disparaged into obscurity losing their livelihoods...
Tell me, if the science is settled, then why are so many who dont tow the line punished so hard for their viewpoints? Since when does "Science" TRUE science say, that if you have data that shows something different you destroy the person that presented it?
Really hard to combat popular theory when those who present it are made a target...and dont say it doesnt happen
because honestly if your rebuttal is that anyting ive said is un true, then you have NOT done your research on this subject...
Cruise is Right, the science is not settled, and there should be continued investigation on the science , to make sure its sound before ANYONE tries to pass ANYTHING to cost people more money.....
Now, I have money to make have a great day
originally posted by: beezzer
The Constitution also makes no mention of internet porn, so I don't really see your point.
Whatever be the Constitution, great care must be taken to provide a mode of amendment when experience or change of circumstances shall have manifested that any part of it is unadapted to the good of the nation.