It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: flammadraco
a reply to: StalkerSolent
The Pagans managed perfectly well with having a moral compass before the religious nuts spread the word of Christ!
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Well dropping the adjective makes it vaguer. I guess TECHNICALLY you can describe the idea of natural dignity with the description of regular dignity, but I kind of see that as using a set to describe a subset (ex: using the description of canines to describe wolves).
originally posted by: peskyhumans
You can cry, shout, and gnash your teeth as much as you want. The fact is, in Christianity Jesus is the Christ, who is the son of God. What he tells us to do is the word of God. If he says that marriage is between a man and a woman, and is an act of God, then that is exactly what makes marriage a Christian sacrament. Only Christianity has the sacrament of marriage, which is an act of the God of Abraham.
You can compare marriage to pagan weddings as much as you want, but that will not reduce the significance of Christian marriage.
It seems you won't accept anything I say, so there is no point in continuing this any further.
originally posted by: StalkerSolent
originally posted by: flammadraco
a reply to: StalkerSolent
The Pagans managed perfectly well with having a moral compass before the religious nuts spread the word of Christ!
Indeed. The pagans also believed in a transcendent moral order.
You can cry, shout, and gnash your teeth as much as you want. The fact is, in Christianity Jesus is the Christ, who is the son of God. What he tells us to do is the word of God. If he says that marriage is between a man and a woman, and is an act of God, then that is exactly what makes marriage a Christian sacrament. Only Christianity has the sacrament of marriage, which is an act of the God of Abraham.
originally posted by: peskyhumans
You can cry, shout, and gnash your teeth as much as you want. The fact is, in Christianity Jesus is the Christ, who is the son of God. What he tells us to do is the word of God. If he says that marriage is between a man and a woman, and is an act of God, then that is exactly what makes marriage a Christian sacrament. Only Christianity has the sacrament of marriage, which is an act of the God of Abraham.
You can compare marriage to pagan weddings as much as you want, but that will not reduce the significance of Christian marriage.
It seems you won't accept anything I say, so there is no point in continuing this any further.
originally posted by: flammadraco
originally posted by: undo
a reply to: flammadraco
you mean they won't be allowed to vote their consciences?
Not if their consciences is dictated by two thousand year old scripture, then no. In the same way I would not want someone in power who used "Moby Dick" as a source for their conscience.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: StalkerSolent
I'm not having it "both ways"! Either there is an objective moral stand that applies to everyone all the time, or there isn't.
There is no objective moral standard, and all the examples of moral standards that you've provided are subjective, not wrong. They're subjective because they don't apply to everyone all the time.
Do you understand the difference?
The 10 Commandments require the worship of a God. Do you think that worship is a question of morality?
The 10 Commandments say not to kill, but then the following commandments command its adherents to kill.
The God of the Bible was not the god of everyone. There were other nations who worshipped other gods. The "God was Israel" was their exclusive God. Jesus, supposedly, came through the God of Israel for the people of Israel. He didn't "come" for gentiles or "Samaritan dogs". He came for "his sheep" not for those whose "father is Satan", or those whom are among the "goats" and "tares". Christianity is NOT inclusive, or objective.
The Bible clearly condones slavery, and Christian used the Bible to justify slavery until they no longer could. Christianity is riddled with corruption and so full of contradictions that if you twist your head just right, Jesus gives you permission to do just about anything, in his name! But, one thing that Christianity doesn't give us is a consistent set of "objective moral standards" that are alway true for everyone all the time!
You can't say that the Bible provides an "objective moral standard", when the morals proposed are considered immoral by today's standards. At best, the Bible provides a subjective set of morals that work sometimes for some people.
Pagans believed in gods. That's about it.
They certainly didn't believe that their gods were perfect or sinless.
You can cry, shout, and gnash your teeth as much as you want. The fact is, in Christianity Jesus is the Christ, who is the son of God. What he tells us to do is the word of God. If he says that marriage is between a man and a woman, and is an act of God, then that is exactly what makes marriage a Christian sacrament. Only Christianity has the sacrament of marriage, which is an act of the God of Abraham.
You can compare marriage to pagan weddings as much as you want, but that will not reduce the significance of Christian marriage.
It seems you won't accept anything I say, so there is no point in continuing this any further.
Christians have been on the forefront of anti slavery movements
originally posted by: flammadraco
a reply to: StalkerSolent
Christians have been on the forefront of anti slavery movements
Except for murder, slavery has got to be one of the most immoral things a person can do. Yet slavery is rampant throughout the Bible in both the Old and New Testaments. The Bible clearly approves of slavery in many passages, and it goes so far as to tell how to obtain slaves, how hard you can beat them, and when you can have sex with the female slaves.
So why are so many Christians ignoring this part of the bible but so hung up on other parts?
Exactly! And then you're suggesting that other moral standards are immoral. To claim that other moral standards are immoral implies that there is an objective moral standard you are measuring them against.
It says not to murder...
And yet, oddly enough, Christians have been at the forefront of the anti-slavery movement and in favor of "objective moral standards" throughout most of history. Amazing, huh?
Matthew 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent out, instructing them, “Go nowhere among the Gentiles and enter no town of the Samaritans, 6 but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Mark 4:11
And He was saying to them, "To you has been given the mystery of the kingdom of God, but those who are outside get everything in parables, 12so that WHILE SEEING, THEY MAY SEE AND NOT PERCEIVE, AND WHILE HEARING, THEY MAY HEAR AND NOT UNDERSTAND, OTHERWISE THEY MIGHT RETURN AND BE FORGIVEN."
Matthew 15:22-28New International Version (NIV)
22 A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is demon-possessed and suffering terribly.”
23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.”
24 He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.”
25 The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said.
26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”
27 “Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”
28 Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.
John 8:44
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desires.
Matthew 7:21
"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
ME
You can't say that the Bible provides an "objective moral standard", when the morals proposed are considered immoral by today's standards. At best, the Bible provides a subjective set of morals that work sometimes for some people.
YOU
On what basis can you claim that is true?