Who wants to argue creation?

a reply to: Barcs

Well now I must say that's a very likable response Barcs. I have nothing further.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Barcs

Well now I must say that's a very likable response Barcs. I have nothing further.

...wait. does that mean its over?

a reply to: TzarChasm

It means whatever you want it to mean Chaz.

originally posted by: randyvs
Solar eclipse 3/20/2015
Watch the moon placed so perfectly in the heavens along with the
earth and sun and everything else to make this awesome sight, a
sign of Gods handiwork possible. Science being so scientific and
closed minded would rather use words like coincidence to explain
the gaps that science will never be able to explain. Science often
sounds like George Bush.

Science will tell you
It is only by Coincidence that Sun is fourhhundred times larger than
the moon and forhundred times farther from the Earth. This is why
they appear to be almost exactly the same size in the sky. Exact
enough for me to say they're exact, but science it seems loves to
spend time splitting hairs. But indeed Earth is the only planet in the
solar system and as far as we know the whole universe where this
occurs so perfectly. Pure COINCIDENCE that we are in the right place
that we can observe what was meant to be observed. Scripture tells
of Gods precision watchmaker handiwork and that it is certainly not
a coincidence.

Then God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night, and let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and years; 15and let them be for lights in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth"; and it was so.

I think i'll soon make a list of scientific coincidences, be
there such a thing, that when compiled together will dwarf
the idea that God is just to fantastic to be believed. And I won't
even need to go into the fact whereby so many eclipses and blood
moons are occuring in these times on sacred Jewish festivals.
Just more coincidence.

Let the closed minded scoffing begin.

You can't argue creationism. There isn't evidence or scientific theories.

You can believe what you want to believe- you can have faith. But that's the only way to believe in creationism. There is nothing to indicate intelligent design started everything.

Nothing wrong with that- but why try to argue something when you can't use a source? The bible, or any religious texts, cannot be utilized in a statistical/scientific debate.

Science and religion could go hand in hand- but at this point they don't.

And that's ok.