It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Who wants to argue creation?

page: 11
19
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 16 2015 @ 10:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: SuperFrog

To say the Bible and God is a fairytale, is rock bottom
pathetic, as well as being an absolute lie. There is no other
ancient manuscript that comes close to having as much material
available to those who question it's accuracy. I've never heard
of any archeaologist using fairytales to locate lost cities or
kingdoms or palaces, sites and events like they do the Bible.
And no prophecy has ever been fulfilled by a fairytale. Nor has
any fairytale flat out changed someones life. So at least you
now know how really ignorant people are who say
such things. Continue as you will.


Have you never read about the Egyptian, Roman or Greek gods? They all reference real cities and places, so with your justification above, you must believe in those gods as well, right?

I would wager that there were plenty of people from ancient Greece whose lives were changed by their stories of the gods. You like to put Christianity on a pedestal above all other religions, but it is based on the same exact blind faith that all mythology is.

Also there is substantial evidence against the story of exodus as well as most of genesis but hey, let's pretend that these myths are 100% true.




posted on Apr, 16 2015 @ 10:50 AM
link   
Why would anyone want to argue with a creationist? Even if they were right, it's still not an argument worth having.
edit on 16/4/2015 by cvsouth because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 16 2015 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Shane


The Sun was revolving around this planet long before the balance of Genesis, (ie Gen 1:2) is narrated.

No, Shane, it wasn't. Earth revolves round the Sun, not the other way about.

It isn't flat either, and it doesn't have corners.



posted on Apr, 16 2015 @ 08:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: Shane


The Sun was revolving around this planet long before the balance of Genesis, (ie Gen 1:2) is narrated.

No, Shane, it wasn't. Earth revolves round the Sun, not the other way about.

It isn't flat either, and it doesn't have corners.


It could be worth a rethink re religious affiliated institutions giving out Ph.D , or does it stand for Doctor of Philately? They must have a great stamp collection.





Galileo Was Wrong is a detailed and comprehensive treatise that demonstrates from the scientific evidence that heliocentrism (the concept that the Earth rotates on its axis and revolves around the sun) is an unproven scientific theory; and that geocentrism (the view that the Earth is in the center of the universe and does not move by either rotation or revolution) is not only supported by the scientific evidence but is admitted to be a logical and viable cosmology by many of the world's top scientists, including Albert Einstein, Ernst Mach, Edwin Hubble, Fred Hoyle and many more.


www.amazon.com...




edit on 16-4-2015 by Cogito, Ergo Sum because: for the heck of it



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 06:43 AM
link   
In a similar vein, some more "science".



Welcome to the Flat Earth Society!

Thank you for taking the time to go through this FAQ. It was created in light of the realization that for someone with a "round-Earth" (RE) background, the FE theory would appear at first glance to have some glaring holes.


www.theflatearthsociety.org...



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 06:45 AM
link   
Magis!



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 09:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Cogito, Ergo Sum
In a similar vein, some more "science".



Welcome to the Flat Earth Society!

Thank you for taking the time to go through this FAQ. It was created in light of the realization that for someone with a "round-Earth" (RE) background, the FE theory would appear at first glance to have some glaring holes.


www.theflatearthsociety.org...


Haha. I used to visit that site every now and then. I swear it is completely over run by trolls. I don't think anybody on that site even believes what they themselves say.
edit on 17-4-2015 by Barcs because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Barcs




Have you never read about the Egyptian, Roman or Greek gods? They all reference real cities and places, so with your justification above, you must believe in those gods as well, right?


In a way yes, I do.




I would wager that there were plenty of people from ancient Greece whose lives were changed by their stories of the gods. You like to put Christianity on a pedestal above all other religions, but it is based on the same exact blind faith that all mythology is.


This is a lie that effects only you, as it dims your
light of intelligence.




Also there is substantial evidence against the story of exodus as well as most of genesis but hey, let's pretend that these myths are 100% true.



No one has to pretend because you fail to mention the large amounts
of evidence for exodus as well. So squawsh the tripe my man. It does
you no justice.



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 09:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
No one has to pretend because you fail to mention the large amounts
of evidence for exodus as well. So squawsh the tripe my man. It does
you no justice.


Tripe? You mean like suggesting that an eclipse looking cool means god exists?

Last I checked, nothing outside of the bible has corroborated the Egyptian's slavery of the Jews in Exodus, even historical records from the time period. Last I checked, there is ZERO evidence of a great flood, and ZERO evidence that man and woman were created from dirt separately from all other creatures, along with the entire silly creation story with talking snakes and fallacies that go against science. In fact all current geological and biological evidence shows the exact opposite.



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Barcs

This is just a simple demonstration of our differences Barcs.
It's from the pulpit but I offer it only to define my views more
clearly. You should watch only in the interest of understanding. As
true science infers you to do. It's not that long either.




edit on Ram41715v502015u24 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 10:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Barcs

This is just a simple demonstration of our differences Barcs.
It's from the pulpit but I offer it only to define my views more
clearly. You should watch only in the interest of understanding. As
true science infers you to do. It's not that long either.





were you unable to find a video comparing scripture with a MODERN understanding of evolutionary theory?



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm


What part of this do you not understand?




This is just a simple demonstration of our differences Barcs.



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 01:39 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

as though a demonstration were needed. i was simply pointing out that if you wanted to make a comparison, as that video is doing, you ought to compare creationism to the most up to date scientific theory. you can make a prius look like americas top model by comparing it to a ford model t.



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 02:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: TzarChasm


What part of this do you not understand?


Whole thing does not make any sense...

What part do you understand?

That Bible is authority??

That you look at world through 'Bible glasses' that makes everything look right... even you know it's wrong?!.
edit on 17-4-2015 by SuperFrog because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 03:15 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

I will watch it when I get the chance, but something tells me that there is going to be a gross misrepresentation of evolution and science. I already see the word "kinds" on the very front when that isn't a real designation in science. I have a feeling I know where this is going. Do you have a reference to this info that isn't a youtube video?
edit on 17-4-2015 by Barcs because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 03:51 PM
link   
a reply to: SuperFrog

You no longer rate a reply.



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Barcs

I apologize I don't and likely would not have posted if I knew
there was a handicapp involved. Apologies.



posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 07:11 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

Ohhh, you hurt my feelings...


Very sad that during all discussion you had nothing constructive to say. But you were not shy to attack or insult...



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: SuperFrog




Very sad


With your arrogance I'm sure you'll survive bro.



posted on Apr, 18 2015 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

says the guy who posted a public challenge before stonewalling the stuffing out of any and all contenders.

bait moar pl0x



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join