It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes it does. And there are a lot more emissions at ground level than we'll ever see at altitude.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: MALBOSIA
The RHI was almost to the point that a cloud would form. After the plane flew over, the RHI was pushed over the point that a cloud would form. If the RHI wasn't already close to that level the contrail wouldn't form.
originally posted by: SyxPak
a reply to: payt69
You must have missed even clicking thisLINK PLUS NOT READING what was written on top of that page. THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT HUMIDITY IN THE AIR TO EVEN SUPPORT A CONTRAIL< OR TO LET ONE BE CREATED!!!!!! I am going to agree that we disagree. Live and let live. Someday when this crap smacks you right in the face, remember this Thread. Have a good one, Syx.
"And Remember, It's Just a Ride..."
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
But there IS a difference. What caused them.
It feels like a bit of a trick of vocabulary. There is no term or word in the English vocabulary to define the difference between an cirrus clouds and by-products of commercial airlines.
Admitting it exists but not giving it a name seems like the ultimate exercise ignorance.
originally posted by: payt69
So I have to wonder.. how many times did the creator of the chemtrail page check the weather conditions vs. the trails, how many times did they correspond, and did he only post pictures of the times when there seemed to be a discrepancy? That would be falsification of data.. It'd be great if we could see ALL the data to get a more complete picture of what's actually happening.