It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Develo
a reply to: mOjOm
What is usually accepted is that the Sumerian mythology and beliefs inspired the Jews during their stay in Bablylonia. Maybe it's what Undo meant.
originally posted by: Develo
originally posted by: undo
as the egyptians referred to atum as the creator.
Only in Heliopolis.
Each city (Hermopolis, Memphis, Thebes) had different priesthood, gods, creation myths. Didn't you know this?
originally posted by: undo
originally posted by: Develo
originally posted by: undo
as the egyptians referred to atum as the creator.
Only in Heliopolis.
Each city (Hermopolis, Memphis, Thebes) had different priesthood, gods, creation myths. Didn't you know this?
aye but depends what the word was at the time of moses
originally posted by: GetHyped
But by all means, give me one, clear, unambiguous example of a rational, scientific insight into modern astronomy. Not vague verses, just get to the point.
When did the conversation swing around to modern astronomy? I thought the discussion was on an ancient book - why would you expect to find modern anything in it?
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: nenothtu
Talk about back peddling. Face it, there is nothing of scientific merit in the bible. In fact, a good chunk of the claims about the universe are incorrect.
When did the conversation swing around to modern astronomy? I thought the discussion was on an ancient book - why would you expect to find modern anything in it?
Because that was the topic of my post that you responded to? But now when pushed to back up your claims you try and change the topic or use a simple typo as an excuse not to engage.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
The problem with the creationist theory is that it has remained relatively unchallenged for far too long. I believe it remains because of several factors.
originally posted by: undo
a reply to: GetHyped
Rev 12:3
And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
Rev 12:4
And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
=
the dragon is draco, the constellation. it's a northern, circumpolar constellation. it acts like a hand on a gigantic watch. when its tail eventually tips over (from precession) so that it appears to be dumping stars onto the earth, this marks a timeframe that is measured in precessional increments (meaning large spans of time, instead of just a single year /day /month). the purpose of these types of verses is to point to a general time frame on earth, but not necessarily a specific day/month or year.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
a reply to: eisegesis
Excellent post, very well researched and presented.
The problem with the creationist theory is that it has remained relatively unchallenged for far too long. I believe it remains because of several factors.