It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
Well it seems he is a very popular host...
The petition of almost one million signatures was delivered by a man dressed as "The Stig" who arrived at the BBC's London HQ in an armoured vehicle bearing the words "Bring Back Clarkson".
www.bbc.com...
And I signed the petition for the main reason that I enjoy the show and he makes it interesting.
If you don't like him, or the show why treat those who do as though they aren't as good as others?
originally posted by: DAZ21
originally posted by: TechUnique
originally posted by: DAZ21
It's not ridiculous, it's about more that Clarkson now, it's about standing up against BBC's ridiculous political correctness and how they only employ people who fit into their agenda.
Clarkson is very popular because he isn't very PC, he says a lot of things that normal people can relate with and the BBC don't like that, and if you can't see that they're trying to find any reason to get rid of Clarkson then you're blind.
Crying over a guy who cried because he couldn't have a steak isn't the best jumping off point for a rallying for free speech. Why not start a petition about the BBC and its political correctness campaign?
OHH. Because people don't care about that as much as they care about Jeremy Clarkson throwing a paddy, and punching someone cos he couldn't have his din dins.
That's why.
Your comment does nothing but show even more how ridiculous this whole thing is.
No, people signed the petition because it grew to become something greater than saving Clarkson, it had the momentum and had the publicity for people to get involved and sign it.
The BBC is just a media arm of the Labour party and they don't like people like Clarkson, many people realise this and saw that they could stage their protest via this petition.
To call people's views on such a matter ridiculous is very disrespectful. Maybe if you want people to sign cancer drug petitions and anti fracking petitions you should try and get mass media to get these issues in to the public view so they are aware of these issues also.
That's the problem, BBC don't care about publicising these issues, so many people don't know any better.
So get off your high horse and understand that people can only sign a petition that they know is in existence.
If I can get even just 1 person to not sign this petition and instead sign a petition to save the NHS or stop fracking then I see it as worth it.
Just 1 person signing a petition to stop Fracking in this country or save the NHS is more important than Top Gear.
originally posted by: DAZ21
a reply to: TechUnique
Ok well I'm glad we've come to some sort of agreement, but the point I'm making is that you are calling the general public ridiculous because they signed this petition, when it's not their fault, that's what I found unfair.
But at least you are trying to make others aware of more important petitions, so kudos to you.
originally posted by: Watchfull
a reply to: TechUnique
Save the NHS, really?
And your post won't sway anybody, Clarkson is like Marmite, you love him or you hate him.
And although I like him, I still won't be signing any futile online petition on his behalf.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: TechUnique
If I can get even just 1 person to not sign this petition and instead sign a petition to save the NHS or stop fracking then I see it as worth it.
So this thread is a way for you to try and get someone to sign a petition to stop fracking?
Just 1 person signing a petition to stop Fracking in this country or save the NHS is more important than Top Gear.
You may consider it more important, but that is your opinion that many may not agree with.
Gross misconduct Gross conduct can include things like theft, physical violence, gross negligence or serious insubordination. With gross misconduct, you can dismiss the employee immediately as long as you follow a fair procedure. You should investigate the incident and give the employee a chance to respond before deciding to dismiss them
originally posted by: DAZ21
It's not ridiculous, it's about more that Clarkson now, it's about standing up against BBC's ridiculous political correctness and how they only employ people who fit into their agenda.
Clarkson is very popular because he isn't very PC, he says a lot of things that normal people can relate with and the BBC don't like that, and if you can't see that they're trying to find any reason to get rid of Clarkson then you're blind.
originally posted by: nonspecific
I have decided to break a personal rule and have read the OP and then decided to ignore all other posts and wade in with big boots.
Jeremy Clarkson is a ficticious TV persona, After selling his shares in the global distribution company for several million within days of the expiray of his contract with the BBC this is not suprising.
Personally I love Top gear, I love the main man, I love James May and Richard Hammond. I even like the Stig.
I will miss the TV show, I love the false drama of it all. If anyone fails to see that tis is not more of the same then fair enough.
To the OP, I understand your stance on this but other times I strongly disagree.
It is television, and good television at that, trashy made up tv that is a good way to end the occasional good Sunday evening.
The stig driving a tank with a million man petition through London is TOP GEAR.
If you fail to see this the yu are missing the point.
That is all.
originally posted by: neformore
The petition to get Clarkson backon Top Gear has been signed by so many people because he is relevant to popular culture, and people are actually interested in his brand of entertainment and find it funny, despite all its shortcomings and pitfalls. He is a caricature of himself on screen.