It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Evidence that MH17 was downed with a BUK.

page: 4
11
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2015 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: bjarneorn

Nazi propaganda huh?
WELL it's a great thing you are so wiser than 300MILLION +people who you insult about HOW we like GUNS and how much better you are for NOT having any.
For our worries over Russia being artificial ...www.newsweek.com...

SAY ,you aren't PART of nato so the US doesn't HAVE a defense pact with you... GOOD LUCK.




posted on Mar, 20 2015 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

you are fully correct. my bad


My money is still on a proxy by the US.



posted on Mar, 20 2015 @ 03:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Zcustosmorum




So you know all of this before the official investigation has been completed? From someone with an OBJECTIVE mind, anyone could've brought that plane down, accidently or not.


Well let's look at the facts shall we...

MH 17 was shot down over separatists control...

Most damage was behind the cockpit...

MH 17 was flying east over Ukraine...

The separatists bragged about having a BUK system...

Ukrainian military planes have been shot down in the same area only days before...

The facts are pretty clear, and nowhere did I say they shot it down intentionally.

So I have to ask if the separatists don't have planes to fight Ukraine why would they have their BUK systems operating in that part of the conflict?

But now Ukraine does have planes which is a good incentive for the separatists to use a BUK.



And if it was a deliberate act then, and once again from someone with an OBJECTIVE mind, I fail to see exactly what Russia would have to gain from it.



I don't think many people think it was done intentionally, and that includes Russia. I also don't think Russia is guilty of the shooting, but is guilty of being an accessory after the fact by helping to remove it from the war zone.



posted on Mar, 20 2015 @ 04:02 PM
link   
a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex




If it was Ukrainian far right lunatics it would make sense in that little private black sun universe of theirs...


How does this BUK system just move freely in separatists territory in which the Ukrainian army would have to have been to shoot the plane down?



posted on Mar, 20 2015 @ 04:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: bjarneorn
What is the motive for the Russians to intentionally shoot down an aeroplane ... do you think they need one to start a war? No, the Russians don't a rats damn about your idiotic opinion, any more than they care about mine.


I think it would be wise to wait for the reports and all available evidence to be compiled and released.

Within a week of the event the Ukrainian government suggested that it had evidence that the Russian government planned to shoot down one of it's own passenger jets in order to blame Ukraine and immediately start the invasion. The rebels apparently hit the wrong plane.

This is not the kind of accusation you make lightly, so it can be expected that any evidence they have to support this would be considered in the final conclusions.

Regardless, the evidence currently available is mounting up against Russia and their rebels. All Russia has is the accusation that it was a Ukrainian fighter, when the damage to the plane does not support that in any way. So, it's going to be a matter of the available evidence, and unless Russia can offer something more than "they did it!" as a response, I think it's pretty clear where the blame is going to land.



posted on Mar, 20 2015 @ 06:02 PM
link   
Hey all. Check out this headline by RT.
It's a perfect example of the propaganda, deflection, and spin that we've come accustomed too.
The thing that has always bugged me the most is how dumb they think we are. This is a perfect example:
Headline:

Dutch dismiss reports alleging MH17 downed by Buk missile

Presented as though they (the Dutch) think the theory is B.S.
-But if you read the article, it merely states that the Dutch are not ready yet to release their report.

We’re investigating many things. And it’s not a secret that we’re also investigating the possibility that MH17 was downed by a Buk missile. But it’s much too early to draw any conclusions – that’s why we have to wait,” he added.

What the Sam Hell is wrong with these people?
No doubt, when the Dutch prove that is was a buk by testing the holes made by the BUK shrapnel, in effect looking for traces of the warhead embedded in the craters and puncture holes on a microscopic level
When the Dutch PROVE it was a buk then the people who support Putin and the people that support MURDER will still deny deny deny//
pathetic!

edit on 20-3-2015 by canucks555 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 10:24 AM
link   
The Office of the National Prosecutor of the Netherlands has concluded it was a Russian Buk, operated by a Russian crew apparently.

Janes



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 01:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

So what's the excuse going to be? Propaganda? Accident? Or will they just start using the excuse Russia threw out there when it first happened: it's still Ukraine's fault because it happened on Ukrainian soil?



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254




So what's the excuse going to be? Propaganda? Accident?


The US did it, as they sent operatives to Ukraine dressed as Russian soldiers using a Russian BUK.

That should just about cover it.


I mean why not we are blamed for everything else bad in the world.



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 01:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
The Office of the National Prosecutor of the Netherlands has concluded it was a Russian Buk, operated by a Russian crew apparently.

Janes


Good find!

I would be happy the investigation found what I thought, but the many innocent people lost are a long way from any justice.



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 02:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: BornAgainAlien




False evidence being planted is not uncommon, so we have absolutely no idea if the particles actually come from MH17...after what they have pulled with the so called BUK picture in December, they are not that trustworthy anymore.


What would you know about trustworthy when you parrot anything that comes down from the Kremlin by way of their media?



When has that ever happened ??

All anyone has to do is look at the stories presented by American media and then compare by reports in the region.

LoL they call this Kremlin parroting.

How about you stop parroting Christian Apocalypse Israel fAuX news channels and see reports from a different side ??

I know, it is very hard to do after decades of programming,



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: ParasuvO




When has that ever happened ??


Whenever your using Russian media as a source.



How about you stop parroting Christian Apocalypse Israel fAuX news channels and see reports from a different side ??


You found a new word and thought to use it, good for you...Now care to provide some examples of this so called Christian Apocolypse Israel faux news you say I use for sources?



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 02:43 PM
link   
Won thing is for sure........WHEN A BUK missle is FIRED by ONE per set THEY KNOW they FIERED the BUK.........so let's let EM sweat AND learn how they continue lying.......AM I Absolutely RIGHT.......if they sweat and sweat and sweat they will become miserable and compatriots WILL learn CIA has there OWN RUSSIAN TEAM........SO defectors are EXCITED to JOIN actors that DONT lie let alone shooting down civility.Dollars rolling for DEFECTORS.
edit on 21-3-2015 by indiancasinomafiadidit because: letter switch



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

I'm still leaning towards accident. If it was just a TEL it wouldn't necessity have target identification methods to tell them it was a commercial aircraft.



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

I'm still leaning towards the accident angle myself. I was more just referencing those people who over the past few days have been saying that it being an accident absolves the perpetrators of responsibility.

Funny how quickly people's tunes change. It wasn't long ago that people on here were ready to string up Ukraine for this tragedy. Even those who argued it was an accident. Now that we have officials saying the evidence shows a Russian BUK was the weapon used those same people are trying their darndest to excuse the actions of the perpetrators.
edit on 3/21/2015 by Xcalibur254 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 04:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254



Now that we have officials saying the evidence shows a Russian BUK was the weapon used those same people are trying their darndest to excuse the actions of the perpetrators.


Russian made BUK doesn`t say anything about the perpetrators...

- Ukraine had the most of them and had very poorly trained troops, and being lead by the US had one of the best motives (EU countries weren`t going along with more sanctions)

- There are rogue elements in the Ukraine who could have done it (to try and force something, because the War went already very bad back then, or same reason as above (orders from the US))

- The Separatists had only one BUK (no motive at all, and probably just a mistake)

- Russian (also no motive and much likely too well trained)

Besides, we don`t even know if the reporter actually found those particles at the crash site, they have been coming up in regular intervals with very one sides reporting in the whole matter, and SBU (Ukrainian Secret Service) has been handing out false evidence from the beginning.



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: BornAgainAlien

And the Netherlands Prosecutor found enough evidence for the to say a Russian military unit.



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 04:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

All involving parties have Russian military equipment, no one thinks it was probably a F-15 or a Patriot System.
edit on 21 3 2015 by BornAgainAlien because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: BornAgainAlien

And using evidence they had on hand the prosecutor made a point to say it was a Russian Air Defense unit that moved into the Ukraine. Not just Russian equipment, Russian operated.



posted on Mar, 21 2015 @ 05:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: BornAgainAlien

And using evidence they had on hand the prosecutor made a point to say it was a Russian Air Defense unit that moved into the Ukraine. Not just Russian equipment, Russian operated.


I`m from The Netherlands and know exactly what they have said, and it isn`t that ^^^^ !



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join