a reply to: ChesterJohn
Once one reconciles these two distinctions it becomes quite clear, Caucasian and White are two different things, when it comes to numbers there are
people of color that are Caucasians and many ignorant people that do polls and demographics in some instances have lumped them all together as white,
but this is very problematic, there is a large segment that many that are white would not recognize, only because of their sheer ignorance what groups
are Caucasian and which are white.
excerpted from the link below.
White or Caucasian or really black or other?
It should also be noted that though people in North Africa and South Asia can be technically called as Caucasian, they are not considered so as they
have darker features.
"The main difference between White and Caucasian is related to the skin colour. When compared to the Caucasian, the white people have a lighter skin.
Unlike the white people, the Caucasian people have thin noses and thin lips.
The concept of white race or white people originated in the 17th century. The term was coined mainly to differentiate the white from the dark skinned
people. But the reference of white race or white people can be traced to Greco-Roman ethnography"
Even some who are proven to be Caucasian the ignorant would arrive at the conclusion they are possibly black, African, Arab or some other minority,
but some belonging to those groups would consider themselves black or other, but not white, but again some statistics are bundling together these two
groups, the white race is much smaller than is being depicted, and it is projected that around 2043 or so they will be in the minority and I believe
this will happen even sooner.
The problem which makes this even scarier is that the consolidation of power, which was only bestowed as a result of much plunder, pillaging and
extinguishing of indigenous people, is that the power and control of the majority of resources and military power will remain with the minority
population at that time, which means the control of even a majority will rest in the hands of the minority at that point, then one must ask, will
there be a tipping point for this to also change, sort of returning to the days that the moors ruled Europe, parts of Asia and Africa.
The days that most history books will make not great mention or give historical fact that prior to the 30 years war in Europe there was completely
different hierarchy of leaders and kings, including Rome and the original Popes, Euro centrism has unfortunately chosen to omit many instances in
history where the whites were not in any sort of position of major power or rule, in other words, if what the OP has posted were to be a first of
sorts then I could understand the possible fear factor for some, but use an honest eye and review of world history, the fantasy depictions of the
ancient world and middle ages are nothing but Hollywood and pure fiction in many instances, for those that do not choose to read, study and adventure
outside of the common curriculum of world history and events with a Euro centric twist on everything, they will be amazed at the actual truth.
I am not against this curriculum but that is all that is emphasized and taught, which in many instance is full of errors and important facts that were