It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think it's reasonable to say that most abduction cases are sleep paralysis cases, and that's probably why you don't see reliable statistics on the phenomena.
You are correct since there is no evidence for alien abductions. There is also no evidence that distinguishes abductions from ANYTHING psychological.
originally posted by: Scdfa
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
You are correct since there is no evidence for alien abductions. There is also no evidence that distinguishes abductions from ANYTHING psychological.
Apart from implants, radiation burns, surgical scars, phosphorescent markings, landing traces, punch biopsies, multiple witnesses, polygraph test results, radar recordings, video, photographs, FOIA intelligence documents, government and military whistleblowers.........
Thanks for proving my point, though.
originally posted by: Scdfa
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
You are correct since there is no evidence for alien abductions. There is also no evidence that distinguishes abductions from ANYTHING psychological.
Apart from implants, radiation burns, surgical scars, phosphorescent markings, landing traces, punch biopsies, multiple witnesses, polygraph test results, radar recordings, video, photographs, FOIA intelligence documents, government and military whistleblowers.........
Thanks for proving my point, though.
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
originally posted by: Scdfa
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
You are correct since there is no evidence for alien abductions. There is also no evidence that distinguishes abductions from ANYTHING psychological.
Apart from implants, radiation burns, surgical scars, phosphorescent markings, landing traces, punch biopsies, multiple witnesses, polygraph test results, radar recordings, video, photographs, FOIA intelligence documents, government and military whistleblowers.........
Thanks for proving my point, though.
No UFO/alien filter? Just a broad sweep of belief with pretty much every subset? Hmmmmm... the picture is becoming clearer.
Just curious- Where do you draw the line of too ridiculous?
I even believed the alien story for a while until I realized there was nothing actually there except psychology. That's my experience that you are trying to deny me from having which is just as valid as yours.
all you have is a bunch of loosely associated things that are ambiguous at best.
I think we are done here.
originally posted by: Scdfa
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
originally posted by: Scdfa
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
You are correct since there is no evidence for alien abductions. There is also no evidence that distinguishes abductions from ANYTHING psychological.
Apart from implants, radiation burns, surgical scars, phosphorescent markings, landing traces, punch biopsies, multiple witnesses, polygraph test results, radar recordings, video, photographs, FOIA intelligence documents, government and military whistleblowers.........
Thanks for proving my point, though.
No UFO/alien filter? Just a broad sweep of belief with pretty much every subset? Hmmmmm... the picture is becoming clearer.
Just curious- Where do you draw the line of too ridiculous?
That's easy. You, zeta, harte, cuckoold,
Just curious- why call evidence "belief"? Isn't that ridiculous?...Just a broad sweep of denial? Hmmmmm... the picture is becoming clearer,
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
originally posted by: Scdfa
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
originally posted by: Scdfa
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
You are correct since there is no evidence for alien abductions. There is also no evidence that distinguishes abductions from ANYTHING psychological.
Apart from implants, radiation burns, surgical scars, phosphorescent markings, landing traces, punch biopsies, multiple witnesses, polygraph test results, radar recordings, video, photographs, FOIA intelligence documents, government and military whistleblowers.........
Thanks for proving my point, though.
No UFO/alien filter? Just a broad sweep of belief with pretty much every subset? Hmmmmm... the picture is becoming clearer.
Just curious- Where do you draw the line of too ridiculous?
That's easy. You, zeta, harte, cuckoold,
Just curious- why call evidence "belief"? Isn't that ridiculous?...Just a broad sweep of denial? Hmmmmm... the picture is becoming clearer,
Relax there cowboy, that was quite a burn. But seriously "folks", what UFO/alien category do you call ridiculous?
originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: tanka418
I certainly would love to see your code, the data you have used, the probability calculation, to see if I can replicate your claims.
Relax there cowboy, that was quite a burn. But seriously "folks", what UFO/alien category do you call ridiculous?
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Ectoplasm8
Relax there cowboy, that was quite a burn. But seriously "folks", what UFO/alien category do you call ridiculous?
It's obvious that there is a parroting of Stanton Friedman going on along with the Hopkins-Jacobs BS to boot. Nothing original.
now go away.
Now be gone!
originally posted by: Scdfa
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Ectoplasm8
Relax there cowboy, that was quite a burn. But seriously "folks", what UFO/alien category do you call ridiculous?
It's obvious that there is a parroting of Stanton Friedman going on along with the Hopkins-Jacobs BS to boot. Nothing original.
Perhaps it would be best if zeta stopped talking about me altogether. I mean, zeta told me just yesterday:
now go away.
And then he ordered me to:
Now be gone!
But zeta is still insulting every post I write, even posts like the one above, that he insults as "parroted BS", that had nothing to do with him.
Now, folks, Let me set the record straight here:
I tried asking zeta to leave me alone. I asked a couple of times, in fact, but zeta refused.
I tried ignoring zeta, but that only increased the frequency of his attacks.
I even reached out in friendship, to find common ground. But zeta's response was venomous insults of things I enjoy on a personal level.
Folks, zeta is obsessed with me.
How many hours has zeta spent on me? He's sent me well over 170 posts, I stopped counting at 150.It would be almost funny, if it weren't so sad and creepy.
But I don't back down to bullies, they're mean, and obsessed, but they aren't very bright. The only way bullies can win is if we give up and let them win. And they're not going to bully me off of ATS.
Now. To keep this post on topic, I take issue with zeta's insult that I am "parroting" Stanton Friedman. Stanton does not promote discussion of alien abductions, whereas that is often my focus. So his aim is way off the mark as usual.
originally posted by: Scdfa
Perhaps it would be best if zeta stopped talking about me altogether. I mean, zeta told me just yesterday:
And then he ordered me to:
But zeta is still insulting every post I write, even posts like the one above, that he insults as "parroted BS", that had nothing to do with him.
Now, folks, Let me set the record straight here:
I tried asking zeta to leave me alone. I asked a couple of times, in fact, but zeta refused.
I tried ignoring zeta, but that only increased the frequency of his attacks.
I even reached out in friendship, to find common ground. But zeta's response was venomous insults of things I enjoy on a personal level.
Folks, zeta is obsessed with me.
How many hours has zeta spent on me? He's sent me well over 170 posts, I stopped counting at 150.It would be almost funny, if it weren't so sad and creepy.
But I don't back down to bullies, they're mean, and obsessed, but they aren't very bright. The only way bullies can win is if we give up and let them win. And they're not going to bully me off of ATS.
Now. To keep this post on topic, I take issue with zeta's insult that I am "parroting" Stanton Friedman. Stanton does not promote discussion of alien abductions, whereas that is often my focus. So his aim is way off the mark as usual.
originally posted by: ScdfaFolks, zeta is obsessed with me.