It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: Mister_Bit
I thought you might've got tactical nukes and Intercontinental ballistic missiles Mixed up no big deal. The problem is there's not much of a difference if the Russians launch a tactical nuke hypothetically and take out Kiev or any other city. NATO 's response is written in stone.
There will be retaliation. That's why the US doesn't have many tactical nuke's as soon as Any nuke goes off there will be an exchange.
originally posted by: noeltrotsky
NATO would watch Finland get steam rolled and use the time they bought with their lives to organize themselves for battle.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
I'm going to disagree with you on this.
Although several countries are not in NATO, they still have strong ties with all NATO member states, and there would be a coalition of nations wanting to take action to defend it, even without being a member of the organization.