It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Thank you.

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

Help ATS via PayPal:

# Is the Sun four days off center in the solar system?

page: 8
14
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:43 PM

alright then an elogated ellips

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:43 PM

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
An elliptic has 360 but to travel a circle takes less time to travel than the elliptic. this time is approximately equal to four days if we are discussing the earths orbit. there by placing the sun off center by four days. the center here is based time traveled not location.

And we are telling you that is a flawed way of looking at it. Day is too relative of a term to describe it. Keplar's laws also say that if the circumference of the the circle and ellipse were equivalent then it would take the same amount of time to travel.

BTW you should put a perfect vacuum as we now know the universe is not a perfect vacuum.

When I say vacuum, that is what I mean. I know that the universe isn't a perfect vacuum, and I didn't suggest it was.

Actually your last post helped me understand the statement I read by a scientist who said the sun was off center by four days. It was in old article I found in my Late father belongings. he had it clipped and placed in a Bible with Gen1 written next to it.

A scientist said this? Or a religious speaker posing as a scientist said this? You are going to have to produce this article so we can see his reasoning and what he means. In any case, that 4 days has nothing to do with genesis since the Earth wasn't formed 4 days before the Sun.

edit on 16-3-2015 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:43 PM

originally posted by: ChesterJohn

so bent light waves still travel the distance as straight on light waves?
What's that got to do with a circular/elliptical orbit?

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:46 PM

LOL!

An ellipse is elongated.

And still 360 degrees.

Science and math really isn't your strong suite.

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:46 PM

are you saying you can traverse a circular track in the same time it takes you to traverse an oval track?

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:47 PM

originally posted by: GetHyped

LOL!

An ellipse is elongated.

And still 360 degrees.

Science and math really isn't your strong suite.

so you believe that a circle and an oval are the same thing?

and each one mathematical measurements are also the same.

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:49 PM

They are both 360 degrees.

Getting it yet?

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:51 PM
it takes you longer to travels an oval than a circle. they may both have 360 degree but you would have to travel farther to make the round of an oval than a circle.

That could be why the sun is off center in the earths orbit because it is not a perfect circle

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:53 PM

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: ChesterJohn

Whether you are of the mind of a universal big bang or a solar big bang they are basically of the same thought.

No they aren't. There is no such thing as "solar big bang". The formation of the solar system is a COMPLETELY different scientific theory than the big bang.

Formation and evolution of the Solar System

Big Bang

After reading thousands of theories and never reaching anything of value, what really does so-called SCIENCE have to offer on the subject of where anything actually comes from ??

Science conveniently tries to NOT answer the hardest questions.

And that means it is a Hi-JACKED religious study, full of THEORIES, which by the way means SEARCH FOR GOD.

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:54 PM

originally posted by: ChesterJohn

are you saying you can traverse a circular track in the same time it takes you to traverse an oval track?
In space? Where the average distance to the center of the ellipse is equal to the radius of the circle? Yes.

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:56 PM

I'll take "crazy scientifically illiterate fundamentalist" for \$500, Alex.

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:57 PM

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: ChesterJohn

still a hypothesis no facts to prove the roller-derby affect.

Except the fact we can watch it happen in other (still forming) solar systems today!

BS you can watch it happen LOL!!

Are you saying somehow that you can observe billions of years worth of formation BILLIONS of light years from here ??

The amazing leaps of faith one takes to actually believe theories as FACT WOW.

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:57 PM

Hooray! We finally agree that there are 360 degrees in an ellipse! Convenient the way you drop that line of argument and move onto something else as if nothing happened when you've been shown how daft your argument is.

What next? Are there 4 sides in a rhombus? Or 5???

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 03:59 PM

We know, someone who does NOT follow the Bible OR the way science proclaims is the best way to get to the bottom of things, but for you , is the only way for the Intellectually OWNED, and therefore illiterate.

What an odd feeling watching people who in 50 years from now will seem more stupid than the apes in the jungle claim they actually KNOW how things were created.

NOONE KNOWS, get over yourselves that your BOUGHT SCIENCE, is even trying to figure it out.

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 04:14 PM

Yay, another anti-intellectual has joined the discussion. I'm sure you have much to bring to the conversation with your scientific illiteracy and denialism /s

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 04:25 PM
Mind you both have 360 degree but which will take you longer to travel? The black circle or the red oval?

edit on 16-3-2015 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 04:35 PM

originally posted by: ChesterJohn

how far can light travel in four days?

how far do solar winds travel in four days?

how far do cosmic rays travel in four days?

how far can you walk in four days?

how far does the earth travel in four days as it travels around the sun?

This is now starting to sound like "homework"

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 04:38 PM

Yeah, but homework implies a learning process.

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 04:41 PM
edit: too bored for this.
edit on 16 3 2015 by ManFromEurope because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 16 2015 @ 05:06 PM

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
sounds more like the elliptic orbit is based on something more than the suns gravitational pull.

I know...it's almost like we have one small mass orbiting another large mass, that happens to also be in motion.

It's crazy.

new topics

top topics

14