It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gh0stwalker
“a detailed analysis that the human genome displays a thorough precision-type orderliness in the mapping between DNA’s nucleotides and amino acids. ‘Simple arrangements of the code reveal an ensemble of arithmetical and ideographical patterns of symbolic language … Accurate and systematic, these underlying patterns appear as a product of precision logic and nontrivial computing. an intelligent signal embedded in our genetic code would be a mathematical and semantic message that cannot be accounted for by Darwinian evolution.”
Vladimir I. Shcherbak
“Those Who From Heaven To Earth Came". They landed on Earth, colonized it, mining the Earth for gold and other minerals, establishing a spaceport in what today is the Iraq-Iran area, and lived in a kind of idealistic society as a small colony.
They returned when Earth was more populated and genetically interfered in our indigenous DNA to create a slave-race to work their mines, farms, and other enterprises in Sumeria, which was the so-called Cradle of Civilization in out-dated pre-1980s school history texts. They created Man, Homo Sapiens, through genetic manipulation with themselves and ape man Homo Erectus.”
― Zecharia Sitchin
originally posted by: Gh0stwalker
Yes, because I can't think of anything better to do than to throw a bunch of articles and studies ostracized as pseudoscience at someone who's clearly certain of his place in this world and who's perceptions are firmly planted.
If there was a remote possibility of this in your mind, you would have done the research yourself. I'm not going to waste my time. However, I will humor you to a degree and recommend that if you do consider the possibility of the oversight of our existence, Jim Marrs' book Our Occulted History is a great place to start.
Many highly respected members of the scientific community believe it's not so far fetched.
originally posted by: Gh0stwalker
Yes, I'm well aware of his many critics. As is expected when drawing conclusions that do not fit within the mainstream paradigm. However, wikipedia is hardly a reliable scientific source. I certainly hope your research didn't end there.
I could sit here all day and bash my head against the brickwall brigade, but you and I both know your mind is already made up. I could compile a vast list of convincing evidence and create my own thread. Though it would no doubt be met withe the same narrow minded criticism, and we'd all be wasting our time, much like we are now. What are you looking for? Admission of defeat? Congratulations, you win. Another underdog has lost to the quagmire of Internet phd's. Woo hoo.
originally posted by: Gh0stwalker
As if fishing others for the answers is a more intellectually proactive endeavor.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: Gh0stwalker
So it's gone from being a positive claim, to sarcasm, to being rhetorical?
And the point of all of this was...?
originally posted by: Gh0stwalker
a reply to: Wolfenz
Not to mention the fact that we've supposedly gone from swinging in trees to building nuclear bombs in less than 100,000 years... There's that little evolutionary discrepancy...
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Wolfenz
Lush jungles turned into hot savannahs, this is the point where our ancestors changed.
Their/our bodies aren't weak, they're designed to outrun prey, not by speed, but by endurance.
They not only survived in this harsh, hot climate, they thrived in it.
And of course early man man are more like apes, they share a common ancestor with us.
They not only survived in this harsh, hot climate, they thrived in it.
After narrowing down the search to a short section on chromosome 17, the team looked for mutations called copy number variations, in which large chunks of DNA are repeated or removed. All of the CGHT sufferers had a copy number variation in which DNA was deleted across the same four genes, the authors report today in the American Journal of Human Genetics. None of the unaffected family members had the mutations.
And of course early man man are more like apes, they share a common ancestor with us.