It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Search for MH370 could take Centuries"

page: 1
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:10 AM
link   
Just how unrealistic is the fake search of the Southern Indian Ocean?

www.news.com.au... 61698394

According to one Oceanographer connected to the search, it could literally take HUNDREDS of years!

Which leads one to ask, " what's the point"?

The search has gone on for over a year now and officials are starting to let it be known that it can't last much longer.

Many millions of dollars has changed hands for the single purpose of showing the world SOMETHING is being done.

Abbott's artificial odyssey to nowhere has been a 'doubling down' on a bad bluff to cover-up the hijacking of a commercial airliner and it's subsequent shoot down.

This coming together of the signatories of the Proliferation Security Initiative to restore business as usual has failed miserably.

Those that know the truth have come forth to point out the string of lies the 'Official Story' is based on.

What were left with is a massive bill for an Aqua Drama that Oceanographers are now admitting didn't have any chance of success in the first place.

MH370 was last seen headed north and to convince the public that it did a U-Turn towards the middle of nowhere an impressive operation was staged.

The idea that the plane must be in the southern ocean, because that's where they're searching is the fraud being perpetrated against society.










posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:19 AM
link   
Well that ocean is a very very big place and it's by far the most likely explanation.

What evidence do you have to support the idea that anything else may have happened?

edit on 13-3-2015 by Prezbo369 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:22 AM
link   
Maybe it COULD take centuries, if the Philadelphia Experiment was re-imagined on a Passenger Jet. Perhaps it simply slipped into a space-time vortex and will emerge unharmed a hundred years into our future?



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:22 AM
link   
Oh please don't ask...youll be sorry.a reply to: Prezbo369



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Prezbo369

"By far the most likely"???

Based on what???

Fake Inmarsat data is the only thing pointing to the southern ocean.



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Psynic
a reply to: Prezbo369

"By far the most likely"???

Based on what???


Reality...



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Prezbo369

originally posted by: Psynic
a reply to: Prezbo369

"By far the most likely"???

Based on what???


Reality...


The MSM cover story is not "reality".

Do you have ANYTHING other than one MIC corporation's tailor made alibi to hide the interdiction of a hijacked airliner.

The reality is, Sir Timothy Clark called BS on the southern Indian ocean search and he knows a lot more about it than you.

www.spiegel.de...




posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:56 AM
link   
get some psychic detectives on the case



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Psynic

The MSM cover story is not "reality".


History and psychics say otherwise, hence 'reality'...


Do you have ANYTHING other than one MIC corporation's tailor made alibi to hide the interdiction of a hijacked airliner.


It's the explanation with the least amount of assumptions, how many assumptions does you explanation have?....


The reality is, Sir Timothy Clark called BS on the southern Indian ocean search and he knows a lot more about it than you.

www.spiegel.de...


Good grief did you even read that interview? he hasn't got a clue and is guessing just like the rest of us.



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 10:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Prezbo369
Well that ocean is a very very big place and it's by far the most likely explanation.

What evidence do you have to support the idea that anything else may have happened?


Um the fact that we have satellites that track everything along with radar. The technology we have in this day in age, at least the kind we are allowed to know about, is more than capable of knowing what happened. This whole MH370 is just a bunch of lies and misleads.

ID



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: ItalianDressing

originally posted by: Prezbo369
Well that ocean is a very very big place and it's by far the most likely explanation.

What evidence do you have to support the idea that anything else may have happened?


Um the fact that we have satellites that track everything along with radar. The technology we have in this day in age, at least the kind we are allowed to know about, is more than capable of knowing what happened. This whole MH370 is just a bunch of lies and misleads.

ID
Concur!

The satellite tech knows where the plane is/went!!

USA so so quiet on this because they already know what happened and where the plane is.



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 11:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: ItalianDressing
Um the fact that we have satellites that track everything along with radar. The technology we have in this day in age, at least the kind we are allowed to know about, is more than capable of knowing what happened.


Satellites via GPS yes, but as you must know such tech can go wrong and break down. It is not unheard of...


This whole MH370 is just a bunch of lies and misleads.


So you have no evidence? just claims of conspiracy....and more baseless assumptions.



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Prezbo369

originally posted by: ItalianDressing
Um the fact that we have satellites that track everything along with radar. The technology we have in this day in age, at least the kind we are allowed to know about, is more than capable of knowing what happened.


Satellites via GPS yes, but as you must know such tech can go wrong and break down. It is not unheard of...


This whole MH370 is just a bunch of lies and misleads.


So you have no evidence? just claims of conspiracy....and more baseless assumptions.



Yes just like 9/11, no direct evidence, but my tiny brain can easily see the hogwash. You do not need evidence when it is blatantly obvious. Especially the important people on board the plane. Very much motive.

ID
edit on 13-3-2015 by ItalianDressing because: (no reason given)

edit on 13-3-2015 by ItalianDressing because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Prezbo369

originally posted by: Psynic

The MSM cover story is not "reality".


History and psychics say otherwise, hence 'reality'...


Do you have ANYTHING other than one MIC corporation's tailor made alibi to hide the interdiction of a hijacked airliner.


It's the explanation with the least amount of assumptions, how many assumptions does you explanation have?....


The reality is, Sir Timothy Clark called BS on the southern Indian ocean search and he knows a lot more about it than you.

www.spiegel.de...


Good grief did you even read that interview? he hasn't got a clue and is guessing just like the rest of us.





You obviously don't know what an "assumption" is.

An assumption, in this case, is a theory based on one single piece of information.

That information has been provided by Inmarsat.

It required that someone invent, that is to say, create for the first time ever, in the history of the world, a brand new way to determine the position of an airplane that defies the laws of mathematics.

I call it "The Miracle Formula".

Once you swallow the formula everything makes sense.




posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 11:53 AM
link   
What are the pieces of this puzzle?

(1) MH370 turns off transponders.

(2) Ceases (coherent) radio communication.

(3) Reverses course.

(4) Alters course.

(5) Alters course.

(6) Alters course.

(7) Is tracked on Malaysian radar.

(8) Confusion and questioning between ATC and other aircraft in the area.

(9) Malaysian Military Radar has MH370 on a northerly track exiting the Straits of Malacca near the Andaman Islands on a course towards Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan.

(10) (from Najib and Obama's address a month later: "When asked to interdict" on a possible shipment of WMD Malayasia has "never failed")

(11) Malaysia see MH370 on radar, off course, un-responsive and soon to be departing their sector.

(12) Jet fighter interceptors ARE scrambled.

____________________________________

These are the essential facts as I see them.

One can extrapolate from this point ad infinitum, but there's no need.

The policy since 9/11 is clear and the 103 nations that have signed on to PSI ('Proliferation Security Initiative') since then, all agree to do everything in their power to INTERDICT in air piracy.

Malaysia signing on "after the fact" would be an entertaining sub-plot for those so inclined.

This "logic" is what gets me from "A to B" as Einstein said.

To get to the Southern Indian Ocean from there took more than mere "imagination" on the part of Inmarsat.





edit on -05:0002153132015-03-13T12:13:02-05:00 by Psynic because: PSI

edit on -05:0031153162015-03-13T12:16:31-05:00 by Psynic because: clarity



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 12:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Psynic

It's only fake to you.



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Psynic

Oh please you have way less supporting your cockamamy story.



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 12:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
a reply to: Psynic

It's only fake to you.


You flatter me.

Sir Timothy Clark should get the lions share of the credit.

As the biggest operator of B777s and with his experience running other airlines in SE Asia, his coming out in the press to say we are being lied to was a real motivator.

I figure, he's looked into it rather thoroughly, since he wouldn't want any of the millions of passengers flying on his B777s to come to the same end.






posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 12:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
a reply to: Psynic

Oh please you have way less supporting your cockamamy story.


Specifically 'witch'
of the twelve facts I enumerated are you referring to?





posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 01:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: ItalianDressing
Yes just like 9/11, no direct evidence, but my tiny brain can easily see the hogwash. You do not need evidence when it is blatantly obvious. Especially the important people on board the plane. Very much motive.


If it were 'blatantly obvious' we wouldn't be having this exchange.

You have no evidence, nor a single good reason to reach the conclusion you've arrived at.




top topics



 
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join