Exclusive: From 'Red October' village, new evidence on downing of Malaysian plane over Ukraine

originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

And this puts it back on the table...

Was MH17 shot down by a Su-25? Former pilots are responding

No it doesn't might want to reread it it has been proven to be impossible. And you got to love the generals assessment of no body saw the missile as proof it wasn't. Sadly we do have eye witnesses to the BUK launch but that's what happens when you use old news.

a reply to: dragonridr

No it doesn't might want to reread it it has been proven to be impossible. And you got to love the generals assessment of no body saw the missile as proof it wasn't. Sadly we do have eye witnesses to the BUK launch but that's what happens when you use old news.

Old news...?

It`s a three day later article from the pilots who flew the SU-25...German MSM being at it again.

a reply to: BornAgainAlien

hitting the engine on the port side of the plane.[9] This resulted in the aircraft going out of control and spiraling groundward, crashing

en.m.wikipedia.org...

Didn't hit near the cockpit or cause it to explode in midair. So how is it similar again?

a reply to: Zaphod58

In the sense that big plane was brought down by it and also that the plane not totally exploded as you would see with BUK.

a reply to: BornAgainAlien

First off the Atlantique isn't a big aircraft compared to the 777.

Second, there's a huge difference between "the R-60 can't shoot down a big airplane" and "the R-60 won't hit near the cockpit and cause it to explode like MH17 did".

MH17 shows all the evidence of a sudden and instant explosion, including the data recorders. There isn't an air to air missile in the world that will do that without it being the luckiest shot ever made. A SAM like the Buk on the other hand will do that.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: BornAgainAlien

First off the Atlantique isn't a big aircraft compared to the 777.

Second, there's a huge difference between "the R-60 can't shoot down a big airplane" and "the R-60 won't hit near the cockpit and cause it to explode like MH17 did".

MH17 shows all the evidence of a sudden and instant explosion, including the data recorders. There isn't an air to air missile in the world that will do that without it being the luckiest shot ever made. A SAM like the Buk on the other hand will do that.

Thought you might want to read this alot of information even explains why the BUK fired.
mh17.correctiv.org...

a reply to: dragonridr

Reading the same propaganda once is good enough for me.

originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: dragonridr

Reading the same propaganda once is good enough for me.

It wasn't for you I already know you can't read anything unless it's sponsored by the state And approved for consumption by Putin. I was showing it to Zaphod58 it goes into detail what he was trying to tell you.