It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: Kukri
Well if it keeps that Demon out of the Whitehouse great!
She's evil I telz ya! EVIL!!
Has anyone read "Trance Formation of America" (The True Life Story of a CIA Slave) by Cathy O'Brien with Mark Phillips? I haven't checked any information on ATS but even as a casual reader is an eye opener regarding the Bush/Cheney/CIA Whitehouse and the Clintons regarding the nature of both as being EVIL elects.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
This is all based on the premise that Hillary Clinton is an idiot. She's not.
She's been First Lady, Senator, and Sec. of State. She KNOWS politics and has been in the game most of her life. She's got people that have people to watch her back.
Get it out now, by 2016 no one will even really care about this.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Hillary's biggest enemy is not the Republican party...It's Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett.
1.) Author and purported Clinton insider Ed Klein states that his sources reported that after Hillary Clinton left the State Department, Valerie Jarrett's people were seen removing official [ "tons of"] documents from her old offices.
Klein said his sources at the State Department say they are seeing “tons of documents being wheeled through the corridors from Clinton’s old offices, and they’re going through these looking for problems on her expense account, on her dealings with foreign leaders — all of this, I’m told, is prompted by Valerie Jarrett and the president, who do not want to see Hillary Clinton president of the United States.”
2.) Official Form of-109 has to be signed by every State Department employee leaving their position. It is a separation statement which mandates all former employees have “surrendered to responsible officials all unclassified documents and papers relating to the official business of the Government acquired by [the employee] while in the employ of the Department or USIA.”
COPY of OF-109:
Additionally, the State Department’s records management handbook reads that parting officials “must ensure that all record material that they possess is incorporated in the Department’s official files and that all file searches for which they have been tasked have been completed, such as those required to respond to FOIA, Congressional, or litigation-related documents requests.”
The handbook also warns, “Fines, imprisonment or both may be imposed for the willful and unlawful removal or destruction of records as stated in the U.S. Criminal Code.”
Former Department of Justice lawyer Shannen Coffin was on “The Kelly File” tonight to discuss these documents. He said it’s “demonstrably not true” that Clinton followed all the rules, explaining that she didn’t comply with the Federal Records Act or the State Department’s records management handbook.
3.) At her speech from the U.N. the other day, Hillary Clinton insisted that she did everything by the book, broke no laws, heeded all regulations while leaving State.
"I fully complied with every rule I was governed by," Clinton said in a 20-minute news conference that marked her first comments on the controversy.
4.) Hillary Clinton waited until two years AFTER leaving State before submitting her 55k State Dept. emails.
5.) Today, at a State Department press conference:
State Dept's Psaki Won't Say If Hillary Signed OF-109 Separation Agreement: "I Don't Have An Update On That"
QUESTION: Right, but did Secretary Clinton – a former DOJ attorney has asked if – under department policy, asked if Secretary Clinton, like all officials here in this building when they depart or separate from office, has to sign something called a form OF-109. It’s a separation statement declaring that when you leave office, you’re turning in – turn over not just classified materials, but any documents for official purposes. Did she sign --
JEN PSAKI, STATE DEPARTMENT: Sure. I think this was asked – it was more than two years ago. I don’t have an update on that specific question at this point.
NOTICE how Psaki wouldn't admit to having the document, while at the same time reminding the press (subtext: attention Hillary Clinton) that it's been "two years ago"?
So, let's play 'connect the dots".
-We know there is no love lost between the Obamas and the Clintons.
-It is also common knowledge that President Obama would much rather have Elizabeth Warren as the next/first woman President, as
Obama/Jarrett know a President Hillary Clinton will not carry forward the Obama agenda as well as a President Warren.
-If the State Department produces Hillary's SIGNED State Department Separation Form (OF-109) BEFORE Hillary declares, Hillary could be convicted of a felony.
-A whisper in Hillary's ear from Valerie Jarrett that they hold the signed OF-109 Doc. would be all Obama needs to have Hillary bow out of the race.
-After Hillary leaves the race, Warren takes her place...and Hillary's OF-109 will be conveniently 'lost'(as so many OTHER State Department official documents get lost).
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: BlueMule
Would you vote for Warren?
The Obamas would.
originally posted by: MKMoniker
a reply to: IAMTAT
Lady MacClinton has TONS of enemies. She's even got horns on the new cover of TIME:
"TIME" SWEARS THEY DIDN'T GIVE KILLARY "HORNS"
VHB: Obama claims he never had email contacts with her. HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN? She was appointed (by him) as his Secretary of State 2009 to 2013.
beezzer: He read about her becoming Sec. of State in the paper.
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: vethumanbeing
Thank you for bringing this book up as it should be read by everyone to gain true insight into the depths of how far the rabbit hole goes!
One can simply read it and discern for yourself whether or not it has weight, I shall post the pdf below!
Tranceformation of America
DEAR STATE DEPARTMENT: WHERE IS HILLARY CLINTON’S OF-109 FORM?
According to people who would know, like National Review’s Shannen Coffin, on or near her last day as Secretary of State, per government policy, Ms. Clinton was required to sign what is known as the OF-109 form. Coffin, a former senior lawyer at the State Department, says that the OF-109 is an acknowledgement that the departing State Department employee has returned and/or turned over all official documents and records to the State Department.
Three crucially important points here:
Those records are not limited to classified material. All records must be left in the hands of the State Department.
Those records would include emails.
The OF-109 is signed under penalty of perjury.
For two days now (today will undoubtedly be the third), Fox News has requested the status of Ms. Clinton’s OF-109 form from the State Department. For two days now, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki has dodged, weaved, parsed and ducked in ways that would impress Sugar Ray Robinson.
The reasons for the dodge are obvious. There is no upside to answering the question. If Ms. Clinton did sign the OF-109, she’s almost certainly guilty of perjury; she swore under oath that the State Department had everything when she knew that a lot of that everything was sitting in a server at a black-site known as her Chappaqua home.
If Ms. Clinton did not sign the OF-109, why not? Why was she given an exemption? Was the exemption legal? Where did the breakdown occur? Who is responsible for the breakdown?