It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

'Start Killing Russians': Outrageous Outburst by Fox News Military Analyst

page: 3
15
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: tsurfer2000h



Which is why my comments are true...the US is not sending offensive weapons to Ukraine.

Not really, it just shows you guys aren't sending them anything advance that could give them an advantage over the rebels, but just the "basic" stuff.



And yet you don't see through Russia's BS. It's the same story the US has been spouting for decades "We have to invade Iraq because WMDs", "We have to invade Afghanistan because there's terrorists who hate American and want to destroy it".

"We have to Invade Ukraine because they want to join NATO and destroy us."

But see, this actually makes a lot of sense to me. Because, how else could you explain the reason behind the NATO expansion towards Russia after the dissolution of the warsaw pact? For what purpose?
If you think what could be done by a anti-missile system set up in Ukraine, you would see it makes sense why Russia can't allow it.



Probably the part where you said the U.S. needs to stay out of Ukraine, while in the same breath talking about how Russian can't/won't allow Ukraine to do something. How you can't see telling one country to butt out and not another country the same as being a double standard is, frankly, shocking.

But look, you are right. But the thing is, we dont live in that kind of world. We live in a world where international laws dont apply to superpowers and they can do whatever they want. But i explained it too many times in this thread alone why's it not shocking, but "justified".

Anyways, i think i've said everything that i needed to say. Anything else that i might say would just be repeating myself which i dislike.



Mmmk well you stuck a quote of me in with a reply to surfer. Unfortunately I have neither the time nor level of give a crap needed to sift through all the threads you've commented in to see how exactly you've explained this double standard as being justified "because Russia." Your apathy begets my apathy, so I'm gonna stick with "it's different because it's Russia" as being the answer here. Thanks




posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Nikola014




Not really, it just shows you guys aren't sending them anything advance that could give them an advantage over the rebels, but just the "basic" stuff.


If the US sends anything it would be something that would surely give them an advantage over the separatists. You can believe that.

Not sure who your quoting here, but it isn't me.



And yet you don't see through Russia's BS. It's the same story the US has been spouting for decades "We have to invade Iraq because WMDs", "We have to invade Afghanistan because there's terrorists who hate American and want to destroy it".





Probably the part where you said the U.S. needs to stay out of Ukraine, while in the same breath talking about how Russian can't/won't allow Ukraine to do something. How you can't see telling one country to butt out and not another country the same as being a double standard is, frankly, shocking.


So how about you reply to the person your quoting.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: SecretKnowledge
How about America keeping its nose out and not making a bad situation worse?


Vietnam should be a lesson to the USA at what happens when you get involved in foreign civil wars.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:08 AM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs




This is an across the board sentiment...

& should be drilled into the minds of the War Machine.


So Russia is free to do as they please...gotcha.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:09 AM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok




Vietnam should be a lesson to the USA at what happens when you get involved in foreign civil wars.


This is much more than just a civil war, because had it just been the separatists against Ukraine without Russia backing them how long would they have lasted.


edit on 11-3-2015 by tsurfer2000h because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: SecretKnowledge
How about America keeping its nose out and not making a bad situation worse?


Vietnam should be a lesson to the USA at what happens when you get involved in foreign civil wars.
If the U.S. hadn't intervened in Korea everyone on that small peninsula would be worshiping Dear Leader Kimmy.

Of course, we've never have "Gangnam Style" either. ...Tough call.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: crazyewok




Vietnam should be a lesson to the USA at what happens when you get involved in foreign civil wars.


This is much more than just a civil war, because had it just been the separatists against Ukraine without Russia backing them how long would they have lasted.



And the republic of Vietnam had North Vietnam interfering.


Anyway Im all for economic sanctions.
edit on 11-3-2015 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs




This is an across the board sentiment...

& should be drilled into the minds of the War Machine.


So Russia is free to do as they please...gotcha.


Didn't even mention Russia...

Please don't mention me with bulls# reversals...

If you have a point, make one...


But don't drag me into a ludicrous debate with a ludicrous accusation.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScientificRailgun

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: SecretKnowledge
How about America keeping its nose out and not making a bad situation worse?


Vietnam should be a lesson to the USA at what happens when you get involved in foreign civil wars.
If the U.S. hadn't intervened in Korea everyone on that small peninsula would be worshiping Dear Leader Kimmy.

Of course, we've never have "Gangnam Style" either. ...Tough call.


That was a out right invasion.

Anyway the whole operation had support across the board. It was not just the USA, UK and all the common wealth put in a huge amount of troops and equipment.


UK does not have those resources anymore. Our Army is down to 80,000.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: ScientificRailgun




If the U.S. hadn't intervened in Korea everyone on that small peninsula would be worshiping Dear Leader Kimmy.


How depressing would that be?



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: ScientificRailgun




If the U.S. hadn't intervened in Korea everyone on that small peninsula would be worshiping Dear Leader Kimmy.


How depressing would that be?

Pretty depressing. I enjoy some K-Pop, so not having that would be sad. Even if I can't understand what they're saying.
edit on 11-3-2015 by ScientificRailgun because: Spelling!!!



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:23 AM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs




Didn't even mention Russia...


And yet your on a thread discussing Russia...what was I thinking.



Please don't mention me with bulls# reversals...


Then don't post bulls# and I won't.



If you have a point, make one...


Pretty sure I made my point.



But don't drag me into a ludicrous debate with a ludicrous accusation.


You didn't have to reply back, and I wasn't trying to drag you into anything as I was pointing out I see where you stand. So please show me where I accused you of anything, because asking a question is far from accusing.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: tsurfer2000h


And yet your on a thread discussing Russia...what was I thinking.


I'm in a thread discussing a United States Military adviser saying people should kill Russians...

I don't know what you're thinking.


Then don't post bulls# and I won't.


Spurious lies.

& another reversal.

Do not project your bulls# onto me.


Pretty sure I made my point.


No, you tried to reverse my point and dictate what I was implying.


You didn't have to reply back, and I wasn't trying to drag you into anything as I was pointing out I see where you stand. So please show me where I accused you of anything, because asking a question is far from accusing.


I did have to reply back to advise you not to mention me with bulls# so it doesn't occur in the future...

& You didn't ask a question...

You made a statement of rhetoric and answered it yourself!



Move along.
Don't talk for me.
edit on 11-3-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok
I remember when Saturday night live spoofed GB senior..he was "we have learned the lessons of Vietnam..that is stay out of Vietnam"..lol, no lessons were learned.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 11:42 AM
link   

As much as this idiot is beating the wardrums, I don't think he's implying killing Russians that aren't involved in the Ukraine conflict.



Generals have no other solutions than war. They aren't even supposed to be in the room.

Unless the state wants war.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: ScientificRailgun

Do we have to go trough this every time?

Russia interfered because their safety would be put at risk if NATO set up bases that close to their country. As i've said so many times before, Russia cannot allow for Ukraine to join NATO and have their bases that close. Is that really so hard to understand?


Do we have to reply to this garbage every time?

Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia have been in NATO for many years now and Russia hasn't had it's safety compromised at all. Paranoia isn't a valid security concern.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Move along.
Don't talk for me.


Charlie can't stand anyone disagreeing. Brings out the Punk...



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: noeltrotsky

I can't stand people putting words in my mouth.


Maybe read the exchange carefully.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 12:23 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs




I'm in a thread discussing a United States Military adviser saying people should kill Russians...


And that is where you are wrong just as the source is because it was taken out of context by Russias propaganda arm Sputnik news.

Also you should know he is a Fox news adviser not a US military adviser...at least get that right.



Spurious lies.

& another reversal.



What reversal if you don't post BS then I won't reply to that BS. No lies about it, it is the truth. I know your stance toward America so when you blame the US for all things bad in the world then you are indulging in BS easy as that.



No, you tried to reverse my point and dictate what I was implying.


So you were implying just what I said...at least you admit it.



I did have to reply back to advise you not to mention me with bulls# so it doesn't occur in the future..


What BS is that, because this is what I said exactly...

So Russia is free to do as they please...gotcha.

I am asking if they are and if so then I gotcha. I guess I should have used the question mark so that you would understand it was a question...I see in the future I need to add it for you.



Move along.
Don't talk for me.


I didn't, because if I did it would have started out like this...

CharlieSpeirs said...which I didn't so how was I speaking for you?

You don't like being challenged on your anti US views do you?



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs




I can't stand people putting words in my mouth.


I didn't say you said it did I?



Maybe read the exchange carefully.


Maybe you should read it more carefully.




top topics



 
15
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join